Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A Sukhoi SuperJet 100 demonstrator (RA-97005) at Venice Marco Polo Airport.jpg

File:A Sukhoi SuperJet 100 demonstrator (RA-97005) at Venice Marco Polo Airport.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2013 at 20:31:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:A Sukhoi SuperJet 100 demonstrator (RA-97005) at Venice Marco Polo Airport.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A Sukhoi SuperJet 100 demonstrator (RA-97005) at Venice Marco Polo Airport.jpg

•  Info created by SuperJet International - uploaded by russavia - nominated by Steinsplitter -- Steinsplitter (talk) 20:31, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Steinsplitter (talk) 20:31, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support If only all photos were taken with a Hasselblad, they could all be FP quality like this one. russavia (talk) 21:59, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 10:14, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Arcalino (talk) 11:07, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 11:50, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Kruusamägi (talk) 13:33, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Blurred Lines 14:49, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose No wow factor to me, sky is noisy and apparently there are burned out areas at the horizon. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 21:07, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per NorbertNagel.--Jebulon (talk) 23:04, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Looks strangely unreal/over-processed.Fotoriety (talk) 23:10, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Good composition. Very little is actually clipped, though a lot of RGB values are in the 250s. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:05, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment if any of the opposes would like to consider File:A Sukhoi SuperJet 100 demonstrator (RA-97005) at Venice Marco Polo Airport (cropped).jpg perhaps as an alternative, I don't know, but thought it might allay some concerns from the opposers? russavia (talk) 10:31, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm not totally sure about the coulours, however the medium format really gives something impressive in term of DoF, it may explains the unreal effect because we only see those kind of pictures for fashion and ads. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:35, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- -donald- (talk) 11:16, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support very very Good, i seem to touch the asphalt --Pava (talk) 17:53, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- The background looks very strange, a bit like a painting. I miss contrast. I think the image was brighten to much Qflieger (talk) 18:12, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support I like it. Colin (talk) 22:49, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose It shurely works well as an marketing picture, but for the project it should be more real. In short: Overprocessed, sorry.   • Richard • [®] • 18:16, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Like it. Dimа (talk) 13:55, 8 November 2013 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. JKadavoor Jee 16:51, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose The unnatural vignetting ruins it for me, sorry Poco² 13:53, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose It looks very nice, but just too unnatrual.M49314 (talk) 16:57, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:01, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose overprocessed --Karelj (talk) 23:29, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 22:42, 12 November 2013 (UTC)