Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ljungris July 2013.jpg

File:Ljungris July 2013.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2013 at 09:08:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ljungris July 2013.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ljungris July 2013.jpg

13

1620

481

602

6016

4016

CAs

•  Info Building in Ljungris just below the tree line, Ljungdalen, Berg Municipality, Jämtland County. Ljungris is owned by the Sámi community and used especially for Reindeer calf marking in the summer. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 09:08, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Arild Vågen (talk) 09:08, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition and clouds. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:16, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support OK Pleclown (talk) 13:01, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice but CAs at left (see notes) -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:26, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for note. Im sorry, I've been staring at the picture for five minutes, but I can´t see any CA. I removed CA with LR before uploading it, but sometimes there are leftovers but I can´t see it here.--ArildV (talk) 17:11, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Under what conditions would this level of CA affect any usage? At 100% I was unable to see what it was the reviewer was commenting on. Frankly, this type of pixel peeping may be more detrimental to this project than its worth in correcting very minor technical issues. 131.137.245.209 17:34, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

•  Support 131.137.245.209 I don't know who you are but I see minor CA so I say it to help the photographer to improve his photo, for me it's also the purpose of the nominations in this page, and I think ArildV will be agree with me, I've not oppose and it was in my intention to support anyway this picture. On the other hand I do not see purpose useful for your intervention. -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:22, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

•  Support --Kikos (talk) 09:17, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Neutral Quality is good, but lighting and especially composition is not IMHO. The crop is too tight and the subject itself is not a real eyecatcher. This shot depicts the subject good but does not draws the attention. Poco² 11:52, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Very good, and unusual subject. Yann (talk) 12:37, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Wow factor to me. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 14:50, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:52, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support St1995 15:28, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support JKadavoor Jee 16:02, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 16:55, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:04, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 19:35, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support I really like it, looks like a next generation game, but i really like it --Pava (talk) 20:13, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:09, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --M49314 (talk) 21:47, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /JKadavoor Jee 10:57, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture