Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sun rays at Hopi Point Grand Canyon 2013.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2013 at 15:44:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 15:44, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 15:44, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:40, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:59, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 18:31, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support very good! -- Arcalino (talk) 21:05, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 12:03, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:30, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Neutral I preferred the previous nominations for two reasons: This one is fully backlit with the negative effects of that (clipping, high sky-ground-contrast with low inter-ground-contrast) and the composition, in my opinion, leads to an area on the right of which not enough is visible. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 19:27, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Julian, I've worked on the sky (selective NR) and applied some masked sharpening. Do you think it is better now? For sure it is a backlit situation but I do not see real clipping. Backlit is the only way to bring out the nice sun rays inside the Canyon. Just to avoid confusion: The other noms of the Grand Canyon show a very different motive thus they are not really comparable to the one here.
I hope Alex Florstein, Christian Ferrer, Ivar, Arcalino, Böhringer and Martin Falbisoner are still fine with this image. --Tuxyso (talk) 23:27, 6 November 2013 (UTC)- Comment Did you also work on the wb? Anway, I like the current version even better --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:15, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Not on the global WB. I made slight corrections on the sky - a very light local gradient organge filter to let the sky look more than it was on location. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:24, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- It's definitely clipped, just not at 100% but at 94.73%, but that doesn't look too different. I'll stick with neutral - I guess this will easily be FP without my support anyway. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 15:30, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Not on the global WB. I made slight corrections on the sky - a very light local gradient organge filter to let the sky look more than it was on location. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:24, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Did you also work on the wb? Anway, I like the current version even better --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:15, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Julian, I've worked on the sky (selective NR) and applied some masked sharpening. Do you think it is better now? For sure it is a backlit situation but I do not see real clipping. Backlit is the only way to bring out the nice sun rays inside the Canyon. Just to avoid confusion: The other noms of the Grand Canyon show a very different motive thus they are not really comparable to the one here.
- Support The light. Oh, the light. Pleclown (talk) 12:09, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support The battered Sky is a pity but the mood is absolutely great. • Richard • [®] • 18:11, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support I like it! It's good!--XRay talk 19:01, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Great image-Godot13 (talk) 02:03, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Request A very nice view, but I'm missing the main informations: is it a HDR-image (from how much images 3,5,7, ..., properties: exposure, aperture, ...) or not ... ??? It will be good to add the relevant informations to the image. I do it as an important info for all other photographers! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:14, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the hint - the information is useful, for sure. I will add this information later on today. IMHO the name of the template
Panorama
is a bit unfortunate, but this template is still up to date also for HDR? I've used it e.g. here? --Tuxyso (talk) 12:27, 8 November 2013 (UTC)- A
{{Retouched}}
template can be used too. I did it here: here: Lake Bondhus or better and similar here: Crepuscular rays in Namibia. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:52, 8 November 2013 (UTC)- Done Information added. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:11, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- . Perfect, thanks, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:22, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Done Information added. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:11, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- A
- Thanks for the hint - the information is useful, for sure. I will add this information later on today. IMHO the name of the template
- now Support. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:22, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Nice atmosphere. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:43, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Joydeep Talk 17:56, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support for a change in the FP theme, and per Pleclown. JKadavoor Jee 02:46, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Poco2 13:44, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Citron (talk) 15:09, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support M49314 (talk) 17:00, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:04, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural