File:A small number of right wing anti-immigration protesters, escorted by police, take an afternoon stroll along Dover's seafront. (27039383230).jpg
Original file (2,694 × 1,707 pixels, file size: 2.08 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary[edit]
DescriptionA small number of right wing anti-immigration protesters, escorted by police, take an afternoon stroll along Dover's seafront. (27039383230).jpg |
Sorry - there's only one reasonable photo of the right wing rally as, a few moments after taking it, a gentleman from the police force said it would be better I didn't continue photographing because my photography was provoking the protesters and added that some of them had complained that "I looked left wing" and, possibly concerned for my own safety, he encouraged me to consider calling it a day. "Looking left wing" ?! Probably it was down to either my scruffy jacket or to my relatively modest sized camera equipment which set me apart from the mainstream photojournalists with their bulging telephoto lenses. I certainly wasn't wearing any badges and I was not affiliated to or acting as any sort of agent for any political group or party, but yet someone had somehow guessed correctly that some of my political views ( none of which I expressed while photographing ) might be labelled "left wing". However my perceived political views should not prevent me taking photographs and in later writing captions to those photos with a political bias based on my own personal beliefs and values. We do, I hope, still live in a democracy after all. I should stress however that the police officer did not order me to stop photographing, nor did he threaten to arrest me and he was also polite and courteous and presumably was prioritizing immediate public safety ( including presumably my own ) above anything else and I am in that sense grateful to him Anyway I am not complaining about the police who by and large, including the officer concerned, seemed to be focused on doing their best to conduct a professional operation. However, what should be worrying all of us is that a growing number of British people feel that immigration and the refugee crisis are to blame for the increasingly precarious position of many workers in Britain. This despite figures from the UNHCR and other sources which show that the number of refugees in the United Kingdom is much smaller than in other European countries and far lower than the number in Turkey and other much poorer developing nations. <a href="http://www.unhcr.org.uk/about-us/the-uk-and-asylum.html" rel="nofollow">www.unhcr.org.uk/about-us/the-uk-and-asylum.html</a> However while It's fairly complicated to explain job insecurity in terms of the growing power and greed of large corporations and the neo-liberal control of the economy, it seems much easier to blame it on Britain's economy being overwhelmed by what some of the papers have termed a "floods" of immigrants and refugees. This does ignore some facts - such as that tax contributions from EU immigrants exceed the total amount of benefits they receive and if we are talking about refugees - then we've only received something like 1 per cent of the number that Turkey has over the last three years and we are a much much richer country. I think also some of us don't fully appreciate the total desperation of millions of people in Syria, Yemen, Iraq, Bahrain, Libya and elsewhere in Africa and the Middle East having to leave everything behind them to flee corrupt and barbaric regimes, some of which Britain still maintains diplomatic relations with and some to which the U.K still sells arms (such as Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Egypt.) But even while our multinationals strike deals and profit from these corrupt regimes to the tune of billions, some of us become angry instead about accepting just a tiny fraction of the refugees fleeing the persecution and injustice of those same regimes which we prop up and profit from.
|
Date | |
Source | A small number of right wing anti-immigration protesters, escorted by police, take an afternoon stroll along Dover's seafront. |
Author | Alisdare Hickson from Woolwich, United Kingdom |
Camera location | 51° 07′ 30.85″ N, 1° 19′ 16.91″ E | View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap | 51.125236; 1.321363 |
---|
Licensing[edit]
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by alisdare1 at https://flickr.com/photos/59952459@N08/27039383230. It was reviewed on 20 May 2021 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-sa-2.0. |
20 May 2021
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 04:41, 20 May 2021 | 2,694 × 1,707 (2.08 MB) | MdsShakil (talk | contribs) | Transferred from Flickr via #flickr2commons |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | FUJIFILM |
---|---|
Camera model | X-T1 |
Exposure time | 1/350 sec (0.0028571428571429) |
F-number | f/13 |
ISO speed rating | 400 |
Date and time of data generation | 16:18, 28 May 2016 |
Lens focal length | 46.6 mm |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 72 dpi |
Software used | Embettered by PicMonkey. http://www.picmonkey.com |
File change date and time | 16:18, 28 May 2016 |
Y and C positioning | Co-sited |
Exposure Program | Normal program |
Exif version | 2.3 |
Date and time of digitizing | 16:18, 28 May 2016 |
Meaning of each component |
|
Image compression mode | 3.2 |
APEX shutter speed | 8.51 |
APEX aperture | 7.4 |
APEX brightness | 9.3 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 3.6 APEX (f/3.48) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Light source | Unknown |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Focal plane X resolution | 2,092 |
Focal plane Y resolution | 2,092 |
Focal plane resolution unit | 3 |
Sensing method | One-chip color area sensor |
File source | Digital still camera |
Scene type | A directly photographed image |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Auto bracket |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Focal length in 35 mm film | 70 mm |
Scene capture type | Standard |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject distance range | Unknown |