File:Unusual Case in The Morning Call of Allentown, Pennsylvania on 25 August 1953.png
Original file (546 × 729 pixels, file size: 195 KB, MIME type: image/png)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionUnusual Case in The Morning Call of Allentown, Pennsylvania on 25 August 1953.png |
English: Unusual Case in The Morning Call of Allentown, Pennsylvania on 25 August 1953 |
Date | |
Source | The Morning Call of Allentown, Pennsylvania on 25 August 1953 |
Author | AnonymousUnknown author |
Text
[edit]Unusual Case: Decision Deferred In Suit Where Child Was Willed to Uncle. Judge Carleton T. Woodring deferred decision yesterday after hearing testimony in an action in Northampton County court in which a Conyingham man seeks custody of his six-year-old niece under the terms of the will of his brother. In deferring his decision. Judge Woodring suggested that the parties reach an amicable decision if possible. Oscar Mertz, 46, a telephone company supervising construction foreman, testified that his brother had told him that he wanted him to care for the child if the brother should die. Against Second Wife. The custody action was brought against Myrtle Beers Mertz, Beersville, second wife of the father of the child, Harold E. Mertz. The girl, Lucinda Mae Mertz, is the daughter of the late Harold Mertz's first wife, the former Helen Hilliard, who died in 1949. Harold and Myrtle Mertz were married April 12, 1952. He died April 13, 1953. The will was made in 1949 when Harold Mertz was a resident of Martins Creek. Oscar Mertz and his wife testified they have a modern apartment in Conyingham, convenient to schools and churches. They can tend they can care for the child better than Myrtle Mertz. but say they have no objection to her associating with the child or her character. Myrtle Mertz testified she has an interest in an estate and some money in a bank, but is not employed. She lives in a six-room house with all improvements, she said, and would do her utmost to give Lucinda mother-like care
Licensing
[edit]Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
This work is in the public domain because it was published in the United States between 1929 and 1963, and although there may or may not have been a copyright notice, the copyright was not renewed. For further explanation, see Commons:Hirtle chart and the copyright renewal logs. Note that it may still be copyrighted in jurisdictions that do not apply the rule of the shorter term for US works (depending on the date of the author's death), such as Canada (70 years p.m.a.), Mainland China (50 years p.m.a., not Hong Kong or Macao), Germany (70 years p.m.a.), Mexico (100 years p.m.a.), Switzerland (70 years p.m.a.), and other countries with individual treaties.
العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ українська ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/− |
Works copyrighted before 1964 had to have the copyright renewed sometime in the 28th year. If the copyright was not renewed, the work is in the public domain. No renewal notice was found for this periodical for issues published in this year. For instance, the first New York Times issue renewed was from April 1, 1928. Some publications may have renewed an individual article from an earlier time, for instance the New York Times renewed at least one article published on January 9, 1927. If you find any contrary evidence, or the renewal database has been updated, please notify me.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 16:14, 7 June 2019 | 546 × 729 (195 KB) | Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk | contribs) | User created page with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Horizontal resolution | 28.35 dpc |
---|---|
Vertical resolution | 28.35 dpc |
File change date and time | 16:11, 7 June 2019 |