Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5, Halle -- 2024 -- 4164 (kreativ 4).jpg

File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5, Halle -- 2024 -- 4164 (kreativ 4).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 07:15:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5, Halle -- 2024 -- 4164 (kreativ 4).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5, Halle -- 2024 -- 4164 (kreativ 4).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Intentional camera movement (ICM)
•  Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 07:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Info It's probably (once again) a somewhat daring nomination, but I really like the picture. That was ultimately the deciding factor for the nomination. The motif is a simple gate in the Duisburg-Nord Landscape Park. The basis for this photo was taken using the ICM technique. This photo was enhanced in color and an additional layer was added with the mirrored photo. The two resulting layers were blended together. I lack the courage to nominate an even more intense version. ;-) --XRay 💬 07:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay 💬 07:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose If it was an original photograph, it would have been interesting, but it seems to be 100% symmetrical at a pixel level through the vertical axis, which means it is more digitally composed (like two parts copy-pasted on a software) than natural. Something abstract, but too far from a real photograph or a real subject. Moreover, the appearance looks weird around the yellow lines, there are kind of artifacts, and this rupture is very visible, as if there were different layers. Overall the result is not very aesthetic, in my opinion. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Support nah, I think it's quite cool that you [Xray] were able to create this effect. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Support ★ 18:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment Could you please change the name and the description of this image? It's just not a photo of the “rolling gate at blast furnace 5 in the Duisburg-Nord Landscape Park”, it's photo art based on a picture of that rolling gate. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC) P.S. I like your photo art projects!

• Thank you and good hint. I'll fix the description of this and all my other photo art pictures within the next days. --XRay 💬 06:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

• Danke!  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

•  Support but I like the other photo (which takes courage) better.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive collage that reminds me a bit of the effect of a kaleidoscope telescope from my childhood. Thanks for the formal changes to properly identify the image. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 13:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Meiræ 17:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  12:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Intentional camera movement (ICM)