Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

[edit]
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
55,257 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 49,678 (89.9%) 
Undecided
  
 3,088 (5.6%) 
Declined
  
 2,491 (4.5%) 


New valued image nominations

[edit]
   

View
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-05-29 21:59 (UTC)
Scope:
George Eliot by François D’Albert Durade
Used in:
en:George Eliot

 Comment Following the example of other works to art in this forum, the museum or location where the art work was photographed is usually listed in round brackets at the end of the scope. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the practice can make nominating more complicated. It could be useful if there are several different artworks with the same name. It is easier to see the value and use of less famous artworks as part of public collections, but some artworks can be in private collections or archives. --Thi (talk) 09:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
— Rhododendrites talk |  on 2024-05-31 01:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Frank Pepe Pizzeria, exterior
So you took the time to leave this comment on three nominations but didn't bother to actually check whether they're notable? (They are.) — Rhododendrites talk |  16:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
— Rhododendrites talk |  on 2024-05-31 01:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Scarr's Pizza, exterior

Wikipedia article created by Rhododendrites Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So here's what happened. Charles left the same bankrupt message on three nominations insinuating these are three nominations of non-notable random businesses. In fact, all three are notable and have Wikipedia articles. Now, instead of saying "oh, my bad" and either striking or, I don't know, supporting?, he has dug into these articles and found that another way to try to undercut it. I do not know what motivates you with this stuff. Yes, I did create it. I'm a Wikipedian. I create articles about notable topics. Been doing it for a while. Sometimes I even take a photo for those subjects, and sometimes that photo is the only photo we have, so it winds up being a VIC. That's what this process is for. If you don't think it's notable, nominate the article for deletion, but it will be kept because it's clearly notable. — Rhododendrites talk |  13:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment A very intemperate and sad response from. I am entitled to say that a scope is not justified due to lack of notability. I do it regularly with people and buildings and bits of buildings. Why do I do this? Because I have read the VI guidelines

A VI scope demands that 'Buildings, like other places, should be of more than local interest to justify a scope.
The guidelines state that 'Not any church is worth a Valued Image scope. Cathedral scopes are OK, but for other churches there should be a good reason.
 The guidelines do not cover pizza restaurants.
The guidelines are routinely ignored by many nominators and voters.
A Wikipedian creating an article does not suddenly made a restaurant notable. Articles can remain because no one is that concerned to them nominate for deletion. So my messages were not bankrupt. They were likes they always are. And I didn't even oppose your nominations. I checked the Rizzo's Fine Pizza image and it wasn't used anywhere I could find, so I posted my comment. If you think an image is the most valuable for a scope, why not put it in an article on enwiki or some other wiki? I do not know what motivates you with this personal attack on me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Challenging a comment that is false on its face and expressing dismay that you are not only standing by it but doubling down is not a personal attack. You left three messages on three nominations implying none of them are notable. I responded to one pointing out that yes, they are notable. At that point, you could have just said "oh my mistake", but instead you did some digging. You found that I created one of them, and used that to make another notability claim (without, of course, modifying your comments on the nominations related to two articles I did not create). What is clear is you (a) do not understand what notability means on Wikipedia, (b) using your own definition that is not connected to the way we typically use that word, or (c) making things up to justify your initial meritless claims.
Notability is defined on various Wikipedias according to notability criteria. On enwiki, it's en:WP:N. Notability is about what's needed to have an article. We on Commons defer to the Wikipedias to decide what is notable and, when images here are used to illustrate such notable subjects, if it's best in scope they're sometimes nominated for VIC. That's what's happening here. The fact that I created one of the articles doesn't change that -- sometimes I take photos for the notable subjects I write articles about. If you don't think it's notable, this isn't the place to litigate it; nominate the article for deletion on Wikipedia. The fact is, when you left this messages, you dismissed these subjects as non-notable even though all of them are notable. And instead of just correcting yourself and moving on after my initial message, you've tried to double down with an insinuation that I wrote an article and therefore it couldn't be notable (because I am not competent? because you just don't like the subject?).
But you are correct that one of the photos wasn't in use because the article is very short. That doesn't typically stop a VIC with such a straightforward scope as "interior", but it's swapped in now regardless. — Rhododendrites talk |  23:02, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
— Rhododendrites talk |  on 2024-05-31 01:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Rizzo's Fine Pizza, interior
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-31 05:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Eriophyes tiliae - Lime nail gall or bugle gall of European lime - close up
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-01 18:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-AMG C 63 (S205) - right front view
Used in:
de:Mercedes-Benz Baureihe 205
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-01 18:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-Benz H243 (2023) - left rear view
Used in:
de:Mercedes-Benz H 243
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-01 18:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Volkswagen Jetta VI GLI - right rear view
Used in:
de:VW Jetta VI
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-01 19:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Mass grave of 230 Soviet soldiers in Stryzhakiv
Used in:
Global usage
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-01 22:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Genealogy of the 14 Sapa Inca (Inca emperors), Machupicchu pueblo (Peru)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Günther Frager (talk) on 2024-06-01 23:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Nora Morales de Cortiñas
Used in:
en:W:Nora Cortiñas, es:W:Nora Cortiñas, eu:W:Nora Cortiñas, ast:w:Nora Morales de Cortiñas, ca:W:Nora Morales de Cortiñas, etc.

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 07:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
WildMouse76 (talk) on 2024-06-02 01:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Fringilla coelebs syriaca (Syrian chaffinch) male
Reason:
Blends less into the background, external anatomy easier to identify, highest quality and resolution image in scope, used in the English Wikipedia's article on this species. -- WildMouse76 (talk)

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 07:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-02 04:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Corpus Domini frontal in Museo Correr Venice

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-02 04:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Autoritratto (Selfportrait) Luigi Serena - Museo civico Luigi Bailo - Treviso

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-02 04:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Altarpiece of Saint Martin - The Mass of Saint Gregory Musée Goya, Castres France
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-06-02 05:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Vasticardium pectiniforme (Fan-shaped Cockle), left valve
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-02 07:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-Benz H243 (2023) - left front view
Used in:
de:Mercedes-Benz H 243
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:51, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-02 07:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-AMG C 63 (S205) - right rear view
Used in:
de:Mercedes-Benz Baureihe 205
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:51, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-02 07:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Dacia Duster III - right front view
Used in:
de:Dacia Duster, uk:Renault Duster
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:51, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-02 10:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Triumph TR250, right rear view

very dark. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Charlesjsharp: I agree, Thanks for the advice. Photo taken in a garage, IMO difficult to repare.--Pierre André ([[User talk:Pierre André Leclercq|talk]]) 22:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for your advice, I adjusted the exposure and brightened the shadows.--Pierre André (talk) 15:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 11:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-06-02 15:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Testudo graeca nabeulensis (Tunisian tortoise) male
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-06-02 15:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Testudo graeca nabeulensis (Tunisian tortoise) juvenile
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-06-02 15:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Calandrella brachydactyla rubiginosa (Greater short-toed lark)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-02 16:57 (UTC)
Scope:
War memorial of Ault,view from Grande Rue, Somme (Fr)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-02 19:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Skala
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-02 21:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Ault-Onival Maisons dites Alsace et Lorraine (Somme), (Fr)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-03 05:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Greek antiquities in the Museo Archeologico Nazionale (Venice) - Demeter inv.12

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-03 05:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Ceanothus thyrsiflorus 'Skylark' - inflorescence.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-03 05:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Amazzone by Lino Selvatico
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-06-03 05:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Lioconcha fastigiata (Dark pitar venus), right valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-03 08:16 (UTC)
Scope:
World War II memorial in Sabarivka
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-06-02 21:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Oenanthe halophila (Maghreb wheatear)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-06-03 09:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Oenanthe moesta moesta (Red-rumped wheatear) male
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-06-03 09:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Oenanthe moesta moesta (Red-rumped wheatear) female
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-03-31 13:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris)
  •  Comment @Archaeodontosaurus: has much experience with Valued Image nominations. I am going to express my opinion but would encourage him to further comment if he wishes.
Per COM:VIC, there are three Valued Image nomination cases - new nomination, renomination and MVR - Most Valued Review. MVR applies only when there is an existing image that already has a VI rating based on a defined generic scope (you will see a result statement indicating that it was reviewed and supported for VI as shown in the MVR for "Remote view of Florence Duomo by night".
@Sebring12Hrs: - when I search Commons on the results of the first VI nomination found at "Commons:Valued image candidates/Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole, 24 Rue Chanoinesse, 75004 Paris, 1 May 2018.jpg", I find there was no review on this VI nomination - no support, no oppose; therefore undecided. Probably the personality rights statement based on the people present that made reviewers uncomfortable in expressing an opinion on VI.
You have brought forth another image of the same building but without people. That should take care of the personality issue. IMHO, suggest you remove this MVR and enter this different image as a new VI nomination with the same scope and scope-link as previous. Please add a clear reason in the new VI nom describing what you are doing. --GRDN711 (talk) 04:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 11:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-06-03 16:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Centre de secours Bitche (Paris)

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-03 16:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Ault-Onival Maison dite Le Grelot (Somme), view from rue de la Plage (Somme)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-06-03 16:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Gateway to the Reformierte Kirche Zernez
Used in:
Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-04 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Adoration of the Magi in the snow by Pieter Brueghel the Younger (Venezia)

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-04 05:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of Alvar Belásquez de Lara by Francisco de Zurbarán, Goya Museum Castres France
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-04 05:06 (UTC)
Scope:
La Pisana by Arturo Martini - Museo d'arte moderna (Venice)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-06-04 05:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Lioconcha fastigiata (Dark pitar venus), left valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-06-04 11:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Chroicocephalus genei (Slender-billed gull) in flight
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-06-04 10:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Chroicocephalus genei (Slender-billed gull) immature
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-06-04 14:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Sundial in Herrlisheim-près-Colmar
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-06-04 14:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Interior of wash house in Herrlisheim-près-Colmar
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-06-04 14:31 (UTC)
Scope:
World war I and II mémorials in Herrlisheim-près-Colmar

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-06-04 14:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Wooden water wheel in Herrlisheim-près-Colmar
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-06-04 14:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Michel (Herrlisheim-près-Colmar) from south
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-06-04 15:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Station nr. V & VI of the Cross in the Kapelle St. Johannes Baptista (Vulpera) Simon of Cyrene helps Jesus carry the cross & Veronica droogt het aanschijn van Jezus af. (Artwork by an anonymous painter)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-04 16:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Macrolepiota procera in France, habitus
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-04 19:29 (UTC)
Scope:
World War II memorial in Rozhychna
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
JustEMV (talk) on 2024-06-04 22:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of Zoila Aurora Cáceres Moreno
Used in:
en:Aurora Cáceres, es:Aurora Cáceres, qu:Zoila Cáceres, eu:Aurora Cáceres Moreno, bn:অরোরা কাসেরেস, ar:أورورا كاسيريس
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-05 04:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Ancient Roman busts in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Ptolemy III Euergetes
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-05 04:58 (UTC)
Scope:
La place Jean Jaurès vu la Fontaine des Angelots - Castres Tarn France
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-05 05:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Self portrait' by Lino Selvatico
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-06-05 05:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Callista florida (Flower Callista), right valve
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-05 15:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Bourke's Luck Potholes, Klaserie Waterfall Nature Reserves (Eswatini)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-05 19:51 (UTC)
Scope:
World War II memorial in Pidvysoke, Vinnytsia Raion
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2024-06-06 04:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Front view of two Chlorophyllum rhacodes Shaggy parasol.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-06 04:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Mithras slaying the bull - Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice)

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:25, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-06 05:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Francis of Paula, 18th century Spanish school, Musée Goya of Castres
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-06 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Balcony of Hotel Le Isole in Campo san Provolo Venice
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-06-06 05:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Callista florida (Flower Callista), left valve
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 06 June 2024
Scope:
Pseudocoladenia fabia (Dented Pied Flat), ventral
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-06-06 08:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Oryx dammah (Scimitar oryx) reintroduced into the wild
Reason:
Not sure if this is suitable scope. This species was extinct in the wild then they were reintroduced into protected areas. -- Charlesjsharp (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 06 June 2024
Scope:
Sumalia zulema (Scarce White Commodore), dorsal
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-06 09:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Hout Bay marina, Harbour Rd, Cape Town
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-06-06 10:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Ramphocoris clotbey (Thick-billed lark)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-06-06 11:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Oenanthe leucopyga aegra (White-crowned wheatear)
Open for review.


Closed valued image candidates

[edit]


Pending Most valued review candidates

[edit]

Remote view of Florence Duomo by night

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Mile (talk) on 2015-03-11 15:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Remote view of Florence Duomo by nigth
Reason:
So far best nigth/dusk photo from Michelangelo hill, would say best remote view in general (dusk view is far more beneficial - colors). -- Mile (talk)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
dllu (t,c) on 2024-05-22 20:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Remote view of Florence Duomo by night
Reason:
In my opinion technically superior to existing VI File:Florence Duomo from Michelangelo hill.jpg -- dllu (t,c)

 Oppose The left tower is less visible. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 18:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC) on 2024-03-23 18:48 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London
Used in:
en:Bertrand Russell, de, es
I opened the most valued review. 1656321.jpg seems to be taken before the restoration. --Thi (talk) 11:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 11:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC) on 2024-04-12 11:27 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London

 Comment Ok for the base, but wa can't really see the face. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @Thi: - When I search Commons on "Commons:Valued image candidates/Bust Of Bertrand Russell-Red Lion Square-London.jpg/Archive of previous reviews", I see that there was no decision on the original VI nom - just a comment from Ikan expressing concern about Bertrand's head without a stand. In your new image, you appear to have addressed that issue. There probably could be 2 VIs here - one for the head and another for the head + stand.
IMHO, suggest you remove the MVR and enter this head + stand image as a new VI nomination with a suitable scope and scope-link. Please add a clear reason in the new VI nom that describes what you are doing and why you think if merits VI. --GRDN711 (talk) 04:12, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 11:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates/candidate_list&oldid=881742780"