Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 14 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Borgward P 100 (2014-08-31 6863).JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Borgward P 100 or „The Big Borgward“ built from 1959 to 1961 at a rainy day Spurzem 21:20, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support GQ --Palauenc05 17:51, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Noticable lack of crispness (slight camera shake perhaps). Also some CA. --Mattbuck 15:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
    @ Mattbuck: I missed your negative criticism. Thank you very much! -- Spurzem 21:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose until CAs fixed --Christian Ferrer 17:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)--Christian Ferrer 05:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done -- Spurzem 21:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me, but I´m not sure if the picture is slightly tilted cw. --Hubertl 20:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted Code 05:48, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Elafonisos - Hauptort.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Main village of Elafonisos, harbour, Island of Elafonisos, Greece. --Dnalor 01 10:33, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 13:09, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose noise in the sky, both sides are leaning out, overprocessed (artefacts in all the image) --Christian Ferrer 17:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Noise reduction, correction and shift done. --Dnalor 01 19:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
    I withdraw my nomination. --Dnalor 01 21:33, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Why did you withdraw? For me this photo is very good. -- Spurzem 13:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I think so. It's good quality--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC) Thank you for your comments, I give it to discuss again. @ Spurzem and PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ: please write your pro-review again if you would be so kind! We will see! Regards --Dnalor 01 18:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI! -- Spurzem 21:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI!--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment chromatic aberration on many of the white parts, should be easy to remove. --Kreuzschnabel 13:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thanks for your comment! Diverse corrections (CA ...) done like in your review told. --Dnalor 01 16:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Edge of quai is still green. Not sure if this is fixable. --Kreuzschnabel 17:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Green CAs corrected, new version uploaded. Okay now? --Dnalor 01 07:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Not the greatest level of detail regarding the small size but barely OK for me --Kreuzschnabel 10:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thank you very much for your positive review and help, but consider the picture was taken 2005 with a 5 MP-camera! --Dnalor 01 11:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted Code 05:29, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Elafonisos - Blick auf das Festland.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination View from the main village of Elafonisos to the orthodox parish church and the Peloponnese mainland. --Dnalor 01 10:33, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 13:09, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose noise in the sky, overprocessed (artefacts in all the image) --Christian Ferrer 17:14, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Noise reduction and correction done. --Dnalor 01 19:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
    I withdraw my nomination. --Dnalor 01 21:33, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Why did you withdraw? For me this photo is very good too. -- Spurzem 13:29, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think so. It's good quality--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:32, 7 February 2015 (UTC) Thank you for your comments, I give it to discuss again. @ Spurzem and PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ: please write your pro-review again if you would be so kind! We will see! Regards --Dnalor 01 18:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI! -- Spurzem 21:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI!--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Quite a lot areas blown on the main subject. CA correction wouldn’t be a bad idea here too, or is the edge on the bottom left really green painted? --Kreuzschnabel 13:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Thanks for your comment! Diverse corrections (CA ...) done like in your review told. --Dnalor 01 16:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Edge of quai is still green. Not sure if this is fixable. --Kreuzschnabel 17:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Green CAs corrected, new version uploaded. Okay now? --Dnalor 01 07:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support OK but I’d love to see higher resolution here, it’s a static object so theres no reason for the small size --Kreuzschnabel 10:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thank you very much for your positive review and help, but consider the picture was taken 2005 with a 5 MP-camera! --Dnalor 01 11:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted Code 05:30, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Poertschach Bahnhofsbereich Drautalbahn II POLIZEI-Railjet 02022015 222.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Railjet with Taurus locomotive OEBB 1116 leaving the station, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:57, 03 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support good quality --Tsui 05:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose CA needs fixing, also could use sharpening. On a side note, what on earth is a police TRAIN? --Mattbuck 22:59, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, i can't see any CA, are you talking about the original red paint on the locomotive? --Ailura 13:17, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
There's purple/green CA on the foreground fence, red/cyan CA on the 139 board and the pile of stuff on the right. Mattbuck 17:17, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes, there are some CAs, not many, exept on the "pile of stuff", also there are some on the shadows in the snow. Fixable. You won´t see it easily with 1:1, I checked it at 4:1 magnification --Hubertl 23:47, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
I can’t help thinking I’ve got over-CA-sensitive eyes. I didn’t even have to zoom to 100 percent to see that the background on the right as well as the "POLIZEI" inscript on the engine has got blue and purple fringes. Took me exactly 3 minutes to remove them with GIMP (no Photoshop required). I had to set the red lateral value up to 1.6 which is really not minor, most images don’t need more than 0.6. Then I took the liberty to upload my result so feel free to revert if you don’t like it. Anyway, you have to expect aberrations like this with an 11× zoom lens. That’s why most photographers (including me) still prefer primes :-) --Kreuzschnabel 10:31, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
@Mattbuck: IMHO it’s QI now but I won’t vote as editor. Would you have another look please? --Kreuzschnabel 18:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
I won't oppose, but not quite sold on it. Mattbuck 22:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
The "Police Train" is one of many locomotives of ÖBB that is painted for some theme, it's marketing (here's a list). --Tsui 08:15, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support. What a Police Train is you should ask the railway company. -- Spurzem 10:46, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 23:09, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me. --Dnalor 01 16:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support--Isiwal 18:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice! --Billy69150 20:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support For this photo, there is only one word: excellent! --Steindy 01:57, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 8 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 06:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Lisboa January 2015-46a.jpg

[edit]

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 06:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC) (Changed to QICtotal --Code 06:04, 13 February 2015 (UTC))[reply]

File:Steinitzsteg_B201405_002.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Steinitzsteg in Vienna --Linie29 14:50, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support nice --Christian Ferrer 17:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose there are over- and underexposed areas. Also it seems to be oversaturated. Please check. --Hubertl 02:52, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think Hubertl is right, contrast is too overdone here, plus I added a crop suggestion since the left part does not add value but distracts from the subject, and is very unsharp (I know it’s background but in the center the background at same distance is sharper). --Kreuzschnabel 06:50, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Linie29 09:28, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 08:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted Code (talk) 06:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

File:3_Feb_15_FREO_FSH_gnangarra-125.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination three politicians talking to protesters --Gnangarra 13:31, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose overexposed --Christian Ferrer 17:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
    *the subjects are correctly exposed, its commonly used technique to overexpose the background when shooting people. Gnangarra 01:43, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  • I think this needs an answer, @Christian Ferrer: Gnangarra 00:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - The overexposure is too distracting, and the talking person is not properly in focus I think. Mattbuck 00:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Background too overexposed --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  OpposeDistracting person on the right (the one in the background) - Averater 07:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --C messier 11:14, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Castillo_de_Rozafa,_Shkodra,_Albania,_2014-04-18,_DD_05.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Rozafa Castle, Shkodra, Albania --Poco a poco 08:37, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support A little bit unsharp, but IMO still QI. --XRay 17:56, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  OpposeToo blurry IMO. --Mattbuck 23:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Mattbuck, for info dustspot top right --Christian Ferrer 18:18, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ New version: the dust spot is gone and the picture is sharpened Poco a poco 20:36, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Indeed an improvment, but blur at right and bottom is always here --Christian Ferrer 06:26, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me. --Dnalor 01 16:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Camera shake due to the mirror (use mirror lockup and a tripod). Noticable at to top of the castle next to the sky. - Averater 07:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined XRay 11:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

File:14-09-02-oslo-RalfR-018.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Flytoget train in Oslo, Norway --Ralf Roletschek 08:06, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Steindy 01:14, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
     +1:Be..anyone 09:54, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
     Oppose Areas of overexposure, harsh contrast, tilted. --Mattbuck 23:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Areas of overexposure --Christian Ferrer 18:31, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality for me. --Dnalor 01 16:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too dark --Billy69150 12:13, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Tilted. - Averater 07:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined XRay 11:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)