Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 19 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:ILA_2018,_Schönefeld_(1X7A5314).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Fouga Magister at ILA 2018 --MB-one 09:26, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:55, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose Very unfortunate crop: wings and nose wheel cut off, instead one third of the picture grey sky. Besides, distracting background. Too many issues for the QI label. --Palauenc05 12:29, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Palauenc05. --Peulle 14:29, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support - Sometimes, I think Commons is too conventional. The form works for me and is well within artistic license. I don't think there's any reason why every photo of a plane has to show the entire plane. For VI and to illustrate a Wikipedia article about that model of plane, yes, but not IMO for art photography when the composition works. -- Ikan Kekek 20:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I didn't realize that this is "art photography". --Palauenc05 09:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment - To me it is. -- Ikan Kekek 03:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

 Comment But still it has composition elements that IMO does not add value or beauty to the picture. the background looks random to me, perhaps if we can have a version with the backgroud darker and more out of focus regards --Cvmontuy 13:20, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Interesting subject but oppose per Palauenc05. --GRDN711 20:49, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Palauenc05 and others. --Smial 21:44, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 02:47, 19 February 2020 (UTC)