Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 31 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Darby Creek-Oak in Fall 1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Oak’s still green around peek Fall -- Sixflashphoto 02:23, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Beautiful Lighting. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, to many CA --TypeZero 12:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Strong CAs. --Basotxerri 08:39, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --W.carter 09:33, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Mistendorf_Kirche_1644.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Parish church in Mistendorf in Upper Franconia --Ermell 06:19, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry but the church looks out of focus to me. --Peulle 06:36, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don`t agree. Slightly sharpened. --Ermell 12:34, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support--Jacek Halicki 13:18, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support--Selbymay 08:53, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Focus is totaly ok for QI --Milseburg 13:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharp enough for me. --Cayambe 20:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 09:32, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

File:2017_Pałacyk_Marianny_Orańskiej_w_Stroniu_Śląskim_3.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Marianna Orańska palace in Stronie Śląskie 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm sorry but I find the framing poor, the building is bent. --Akela NDE 07:38, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO good enough for QI. A pity for that big wire, maybe I would crop a bit of the left part and then remove the wire in the sky. --Basotxerri (talk) 06:57, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose poor composition.--Peulle 15:35, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose for now: IMO, the composition is acceptable (the cut-off bench is regrettable but not IMO crucial), but the building looks slanted down to the right, so please fix that. -- Ikan Kekek 20:36, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
    @Ikan Kekek: ✓ Done --Jacek Halicki 23:50, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Thank you, much better. -- Ikan Kekek 07:35, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality for me. --Selbymay 06:55, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough for QI.--Ermell 19:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough for QI.--TypeZero 14:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --W.carter 09:32, 30 October 2017 (UTC)