Template talk:FOP-buildings-category warning
 | This template was nominated for deletion on 11 August 2021 but was kept. If you are thinking about re-nominating it for deletion, please read that discussion first. |
Too harsh language?
[edit]I think the language should be clearer about advising the user to look in the appropriate section of COM:FOP to know whether the warning is relevant for any specific case. E.g. in Iceland there is freedom of panorama when no single building is the central theme. Commons:de minimis is not required. --LPfi (talk) 12:37, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. Maybe smt. like "For exceptions and details about the Freedom of Panorama in country, see here"?--DieBuche (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
NoFoP on artwork
[edit]Hi,
In France, No-FoP applies to buildings and artworks. I should want to expand the present template (+ doc + English and French translation) to the artworks. Replacing buildings and architects by buildings or artworks and architects or authors. What is your opinion ?
Or do you think that it should be better to create a specific set of templates FOP-artworks-category warning ? --Tangopaso (talk) 12:48, 12 November 2015 (UTC)