User talk:DeFacto/Quality Image Promotions 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stonehenge Heel Stone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lengthsman's Cottage, Lowsonford.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Sharp photo, good perspective --Michielverbeek 22:41, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Giles Church, Chesterton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Halavar 18:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chesterton Windmill, Chesterton - 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:10, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baddesley Clinton house west 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kenilworth Castle keep 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kenilworth Castle, Leicester's Building 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land by Antony Gormley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Subjekt well presented. --Milseburg 18:07, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Wardour Castle 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kenilworth Castle Aviary 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Michael's Church, Baddesley Clinton - stained glass 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Austin 18 Six Cylinder Ambulance 1938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baddesley Clinton house north 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok now for me. --Hubertl 22:22, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blessed Cyprian Michael Iwene Tansi by Leicester Thomas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Saint Bernard Abbey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 07:03, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baddesley Clinton house south west 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 07:05, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baddesley Clinton house east 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Saint Bernard Abbey small chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old handcart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment It would be much appreciated, if you keep the EXIF data alive. --Cccefalon 04:10, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So would I! --Hubertl 17:37, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Giles Church, Chesterton - west 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wish more crispness, but ok for qi --A.Savin 11:09, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Shepherd and the Ram by Peter Leadbeater, Beacon Hill, Leicestershire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 22:11, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Saint Bernard Abbey, High Calvary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Per Uwe Aranas. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Saint Bernard Abbey, High Calvary detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality - However, it is suffering from the fact, that you use ISO 200 and f/13. For the given light, a ISO 100 is advised. Aperture 10 would be more than sufficient and giving you more flexibility for a shorter shuttertime which is essential for handhold shots. --Cccefalon 07:26, 8 April 2016 (UTC) *  Comment The camera does have 100 ISO only in manual mode. But you can use up to 400 ISO without almost any noise problems, f/8 to f/11 will always be a good choice with this lens! It seems, that the sensor is optimized for ISO 200 (as some Nikon cameras also!). --Hubertl 11:29, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charlecote Park - main gates.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charlecote Park - pier and finial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ashby-de-la-Zouch Castle, William Lord Hastings's Tower from the north-west.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good guality. --SAplants 17:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charlecote Park - dead tree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:24, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charlecote Park - gatehouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:09, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirby Hall - north front from inner courtyard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirby Hall - state apartments.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirby Hall from the south-west.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charlecote Park - bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:59, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charlecote Park - door to spiral staircase.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:59, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charlecote Park - kitchen and servant's hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:40, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charlecote Park - the lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:59, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charlecote Park - St. Leonard's Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:04, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirby Hall - north front from forecourt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Magenta CA. Fixable. --Cccefalon 04:15, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done @Cccefalon: thanks, I think I've fixed it now. DeFacto 06:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @Cccefalon: please review it again following my fix. DeFacto 17:40, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Support much better! --Cccefalon 19:09, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sundial on the porch of St. Giles Church, Chesterton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grounds of St. Giles Church, Chesterton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peyto Gateway - St. Giles Church, Chesterton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 07:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Peter's Church across the lake at Coughton Court.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 22:46, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower of St. Giles Church, Chesterton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:16, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Giles Church, Chesterton - stained glass 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tsungam 06:26, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ashby-de-la-Zouch Castle, William Lord Hastings's Tower from the south.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coughton Court front entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:29, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coughton Court east view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could have been a little sharper, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 06:33, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charlecote Park - house front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good motive, but the shadow spoiled it. Be..anyone 09:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment, @Be..anyone: I've lightened the shadows a bit and re-uploaded - please review again. DeFacto 17:37, 15 April 2016 (UTC) *  Support it´s ok now! --Hubertl 18:33, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Bear Hotel, Alcester.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 22:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warwick Castle April 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and sharpness. --Peulle 22:37, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coughton Court lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Edward Peyto - St. Giles Church, Chesterton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment CA all over the picture. Fixable. --Code 10:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, @Code: thanks I've removed CA. DeFacto 17:30, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Ok now. --Code 05:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bust of Elizabeth Peyto - St. Giles Church, Chesterton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Green and magenta CA everywhere. Fixable. --Code 10:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, @Code: thanks I've removed CA. DeFacto 17:30, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Ok now. --Code 05:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hanbury Hall Gardens - wrought iron gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Not perfectly sharp, but acceptable. --Hubertl 21:00, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hanbury Hall Park - shepherd's hut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 20:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hanbury Hall Park - shepherd's hut wheel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough for me. QI. --Peulle 22:15, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coughton Court west front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 20:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hanbury Hall Park - dead tree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Well I think this has good enough quality for QI. --Peulle 11:16, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coughton Court bog garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice --Moroder 21:52, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brockhampton Estate - gatehouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brockhampton Estate - manor house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brockhampton Estate - gatehouse and manor house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elgar's grave, Little Malvern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not the optimal light conditions, but still good quality. --Uoaei1 08:07, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hayslad Spout, West Malvern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:06, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morgan Motor Company flag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:25, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brockhampton Estate - manor house across moat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support A bit loss of detail, but a QI for me. --C messier 11:15, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christmas Truce 1914 Memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 22:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Women's Land Army and Women's Timber Corps Memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 22:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Convertible - side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 13:51, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! South Atlantic Medal Association Memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:19, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kenilworth Castle 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:19, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:44, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alvis Speed 20 SC 1935 - front three-quarter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:39, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Convertible 2016 - front 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:39, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Convertible 2016 - rear.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. so I find it pretty --Ralf Roletschek 17:48, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alvis Speed 20 SC - 1935.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:48, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MG TD 1953 - front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MG TD 1953 - rear.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baddesley Clinton house west May 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Good composition, but there are some green CA on the roof and chimney. Fixable, I think. --Peulle 10:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment, @Peulle: I've made an adjustment, please reassess. DeFacto 19:59, 25 May 2016 (UTC)  Support OK now. --Peulle 21:54, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baddesley Clinton Scarecrow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:43, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaguar XE 2016 front three-quarter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 19:39, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warwick Castle May 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaguar XE 2016 rear three-quarter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:35, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stacked stones on beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. sharpness could be better. Third opinion appreciated! --Hubertl 04:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rusty dumper.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel Tower at Mount Stuart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Little bit tilted CW. --Halavar 17:47, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, @Halavar: thanks - I think I've fixed it now. DeFacto 18:20, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Yes, good now, thanks. QI for me --Halavar 18:59, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flora MacDonald monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:41, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Two-wheeled horse-drawn farm cart in the Skye Museum of Island Life.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rusty tractor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:37, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stoer Head Lighthouse light tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:27, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salen - rotting hulks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:39, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isle of Mull milestone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 16:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victorian pillar box, Rothesay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Commando Memorial at Spean Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Very nice. --Peulle 22:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Kelpies - June 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 02:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glas Bheinn (Assynt).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Hunstanton Lighthouse 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:31, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beach huts at Wells-next-the-Sea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:25, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baying Wolf by Jean Mulligan, Old Hunstanton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Edmund's Memorial Chapel, Hunstanton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle Rising Castle 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Citroën HY food van.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:15, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baddesley Clinton house north-west 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Good quality, but sharpness could be better. f/5.6 is not a good choice, f/8 could be better. And please use 100% JPEG - it looks like minor compression artifacts.. --XRay 05:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kenilworth Castle Elizabethan Garden fountain east side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:00, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kenilworth Castle Elizabethan Garden fountain south side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:56, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kenilworth Castle keep from the south 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Minor CAs and sharpness could be improved. --XRay 04:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kenilworth Castle Great Hall from the east 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beach huts at Wells-next-the-Sea 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Composition--Lmbuga 03:16, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collegiate Church of St Mary, Warwick.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MG MGC GT 1968.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:58, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Napier Type 75 TT 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaguar E-Type series 2 coupé 1968.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:39, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaguar E-Type series 1 coupé 1964.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and good background -- Spurzem 07:51, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auto Union streamliner concept 1923 - replica - front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:00, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auto Union streamliner concept 1923 - replica - rear.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 19:32, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolseley 1500 - 1959 - under-bonnet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:38, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guy's Cliffe House 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:07, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land Rover Discovery 4 HSE 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land Rover Defender 110 Station Wagon 2016 - front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaguar E-Type series 1 roadster dash - 1967.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some details are a bit overexposed like the wheel, windshield, wipers and hood. Think you can do something about that? W.carter 22:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, @W.carter: I've made a few adjustments, see what you think now. DeFacto 18:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That looks much better. :) Good quality. --W.carter 19:06, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have the merit to recognize because in 80-90 years I had a car with a Mola-Lita steering wheel. We can not put this type of steering wheel on our current cars. I kept a very good memory of the steering wheel, but not the car that broke down very often. Sure she was not English... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:22, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not only English cars of that era that break down then - surely it wasn't a French car? . DeFacto (talk). 13:31, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Maserati :I have never buy another. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land Rover Discovery 4 HSE 2016 - rear.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Ok for me now. --Hubertl 16:58, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! All Saints church, Preston Bagot 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 21:45, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! All Saints church, Preston Bagot - Mary and Martha stained glass windows 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:46, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land Rover Defender 110 XS TD DC 2015 - rear.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Looks a bit overexposed. Could you darken it a bit?--Peulle 00:10, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. There is no overexposure visible. See Histo. --Hubertl 06:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land Rover Defender 110 XS TD DC 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Acceptable Quality, some jpg artifacts visible (left/right) the bright parts --Hubertl 06:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land Rover Defender 110 XS TD DC 2015 - front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hanbury Hall Orangery and Mushroom House 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hanbury Hall north summer house 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land Rover Defender 110 XS TD DC 2015 - back.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality, perfect wheel--Lmbuga 14:34, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warwick Castle - Caesar's Tower 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:17, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kenilworth Castle keep from the south-west 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment is the perspective ok? --Ezarate 22:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Ezarate: I've uploaded a version with slightly less adjustment, does that look more natural? DeFacto 10:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC) ok --Ezarate 23:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kenilworth Castle Great Hall from the west 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! All Saints church, Preston Bagot - Saint Cecilia stained glass window 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is some slight green and blue/purple CA in several places in the window. Think you can remove that? W.carter 23:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@W.carter: newly adjusted version uploaded. I think the lens CAs are minimal but the old rough glass does transmit a bluey turquoise light too. Please see what you make of it now. DeFacto 21:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. This one is ok now. --W.carter 08:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land Rover Defender 110 Station Wagon 2016 - rear.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land Rover Defender 110 Station Wagon 2016 - left side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 08:38, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! All Saints church, Preston Bagot - Simplicitas stained glass window 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is significant green and blue/purple CA all over the window. Think you can remove that? W.carter 23:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@W.carter: newly adjusted version uploaded. I think the lens CAs are minimal but the old crude glass does transmit a bluey turquoise light too. Please examine and see what you make of it now. DeFacto 21:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can't understand why this window is so problematic when the others are fine? Still blue/green fringes around all the lead details and also at the top, see note. Whatever can be done about this would be appreciated. W.carter 08:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@W.carter: increased exposure and removed CAs in the target area. What do you think now? DeFacto 20:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Much better, thanks! Now it can join the others. :) QI. W.carter 08:52, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks W., she is delighted! ;-) DeFacto 19:34, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hanbury Hall 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:51, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langley Chapel 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:21, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Attingham Park - stained glass inner skylight by Nash.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful images, high enough quality imo.--ArildV 07:50, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flora MacDonald monument June 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acton Burnell Castle 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:23, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canons Ashby House 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Badentarbat Bay - corroded buoy on the beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Could be sharper, but good.--Jebulon 08:52, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! River Rha waterfall, Isle of Skye.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skye Museum of Island Life - visitor reception.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to object --Michielverbeek 22:44, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blenheim Palace from the Water Terraces October 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:56, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blenheim Palace facade October 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tilted cw --Ajepbah 22:13, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, @Ajepbah: I've uploaded an adjusted version, please review again, thanks. DeFacto 06:19, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's ok for me now, good quality! --Ajepbah 18:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity Church, Coventry - Coventry symbols detail in stained glass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 22:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity Church, Coventry - stained glass window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 22:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coventry - old fire station, Hales Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 02:59, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Michael's Cathedral ruins, Coventry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good to me; good lighting and the perspective seems OK. --Peulle 21:38, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Michael's victory over the Devil by Sir Jacob Epstein, Coventry Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:21, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blenheim Palace south view 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice image, just a few areas of CA that could use some fixing. See notations.
✓ Done, @Godot13: new version uploaded, please review again. DeFacto 06:39, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good to go!--Godot13 23:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coventry Council House facade centre portion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments - Weak support; focus isn't ideal, but I think it's good enough for QI, overall. -- Ikan Kekek 08:10, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wrest Park statue of Harlequin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks like good quality to me. -- Ikan Kekek 03:29, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wrest Park Orangery 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 02:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kylesku Bridge 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 00:21, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stoer Head Lighthouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wooden wheelbarrow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:55, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brockhampton Estate - gatehouse and manor house 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SS Jaguar 100 - 2½ Litre 1938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support A bit cramped, but good DoF and quality.--Godot13 21:58, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaguar E-Type Series 1 3.8 Litre 1961.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --Peulle 21:59, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Southwell Minster 2016 - north-west view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:13, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Southwell Minster 2016 - west view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:13, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rover Mini Cooper 2000 (X411JOP).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Nice and sharp. --Peulle 20:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SS 1 16hp Tourer 1933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:15, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great War Memorial Window by Nicholas Mynheer in Southwell Minster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 05:08, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mini Cooper S 1963.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mini Cooper S 1964 (AJB 44B) - 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 23:12, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mini Cooper S 1966.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, although it could have been a bit sharper. --Peulle 23:12, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land Rover Discovery Sport HSE Luxury TD4 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough. --Peulle 19:38, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lock in the Hatton Locks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 07:41, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stonehenge 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:34, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land Rover Range Rover Autobiography 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:04, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]