User talk:DeFacto/Quality Image Promotions 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stirling Castle Great Hall 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Decline because the castle has dust spots on it. ;-) But seriously, good quality. Have a Happy New Year! -- Ikan Kekek 13:14, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exeter Cathedral Lady Chapel, east window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:44, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Western Belle on Ullswater.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks OK. --Peulle 00:12, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paragliding over Hunstanton sea cliffs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 18:49, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Robert the Bruce, Stirling Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 21:25, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arms of the Earl of Douglas in the King's Old Building, Stirling Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 18:52, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stirling Castle Royal Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Looks like some perspective correction is needed.--Peulle 18:58, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Peulle: I have uploaded an adjusted version, thanks. DeFacto 20:31, 15 January 2017 (UTC) Comment OK.--Peulle 20:47, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter's Church, Binton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:12, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter's Church, Binton - The Scott Window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:52, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thomas Carlyle's birthplace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity Church, Stratford-upon-Avon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Info, this is the church where William Shakespeare was baptised in 1564 and buried in 1616. Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 10:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Russell Spring, Blockley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks perfect, except that the bright foreground reduces the colour space for the object. I would like to be able to take such pictures but do not want to carry the weight of the camera ☺. -- Renardo la vulpo 00:06, 5 February 2017 (UTC)~~[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter and St Paul, Blockley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 05:57, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Michael and All Angels, Broad Campden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 21:48, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quaker Meeting House, Broad Campden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rothesay Victorian Toilets - men's urinals.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brasenose College Chapel, University of Oxford, ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good --Pudelek 22:40, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ceiling fresco centrepiece, Sheldonian Theatre, University of Oxford, by Robert Streater, 1670.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and really cool fresco. -- Ikan Kekek 20:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Magical Lantern Festival London - Palace of Westminster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could be a bit sharper I wish, but OK --Daniel Case 03:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! River Orchy erosion potholes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bletchley Park Mansion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:58, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunbeam Talbot 2 litre Sports Tourer 1947.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. A nice car. --Peulle 23:14, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Michael & All Angels, Hughenden - April 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 22:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brill windmill April 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 20:53, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MG Midget 1930.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 09:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star Scorpio 1926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wells clock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warwick Castle Gatehouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warwick Castle Conservatory.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:59, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warwick Castle - The Mound.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough for QI. --W.carter 21:47, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osborne House Pavilion Wing, East Cowes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:06, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carisbrooke Castle gatehouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:05, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land Rover Series III Lightweight 1979 - front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warwick Castle south-east facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land Rover Series III Lightweight 1979 - rear.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Could be improved if you crop out the part of the other car at the right. --XRay 05:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, thanks XRay. DeFacto 06:04, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wells clock exterior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:27, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Triumph Dolomite roadster coupé 1940 - front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:15, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Triumph Dolomite roadster coupé 1940 - rear.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:29, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glenfinnan railway station ticket office and waiting room.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Sky a little bit overexposed. --XRay 19:50, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stirling Castle 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warwick Castle - Guy's Tower 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:47, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of Perpetual Succour & St Cumin, Morar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:42, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exeter Cathedral nave vaulted ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shieldaig north.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:39, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glenfinnan Monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muchelney Abbey - Abbot's House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:15, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portnaluchaig beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful lighting and good quality -- Spurzem 06:36, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunblane Cathedral 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality. Suggest you put this up at FPC. PumpkinSky 00:12, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lactuca sativa 'Lollo Bionda'.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 18:37, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lactuca sativa 'Ashbrook'.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 18:38, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion (manual due to bot problem)

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tacumshane Windmill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johnstown Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! River Suir Bridge, Waterford.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Granagh Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barrel-top caravan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferguson-Brown Type A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaspeck Manor gate lodge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

-- DeFacto (talk). 06:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaguar E-Type Series 1 4.2 Litre 1967.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:01, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! King's College Chapel, Cambridge - The Great East Window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 15:47, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annie Moore Statue by by Jeanne Rynhart, Cobh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruthwell Church - from the north-west.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 22:53, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Castle Bridge ruins, Warwick.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The bricks on the left are overexposed, could you try to get them better? Not sure if it's fixable, though. --Basotxerri 13:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Basotxerri I've reduced the exposure on the left stonework as you suggested. Thanks - DeFacto 21:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK for me, thank you! --Basotxerri 18:01, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stokesay Castle gatehouse from outside the courtyard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sorry, but perspective seems overcorrected.--Aeou 16:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, thanks Aeou. It's difficult to choose references with such a wonky and top-heavy building, but I've now eased it back a little. Please re-review. DeFacto 17:51, 5 November 2017 (UTC) Yes, the house has a complicated geometry. There were deviations not only of walls, but also the chimney. Therefore, I decided that perspective was not ok. Now seems better, but left chimney is tilted to the left:( The house is old, but the chimney, usually - a newer thing. And its verticals are usually more accurate. Sorry for carping.--Aeou 18:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Aeou I've tweaked it again. I've got the L/H chimney vertical as you suggested. DeFacto 18:57, 5 November 2017 (UTC) Ok. --Aeou 18:59, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stokesay Castle from the west.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 18:28, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stokesay Castle gatehouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:19, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beacon Hill, Leicestershire - toposcope plate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:08, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beacon Hill, Leicestershire - toposcope.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:08, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! All Saints church, Sudbury - evacuees' gratitude stained glass window by Michael Stokes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:54, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hanbury toposcope plate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolseley Hornet Swallow 1932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 20:52, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dumfries Suspension Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A gloomy photo, but good image quality for me.--Famberhorst 06:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leyland Trojan tourer 1924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:38, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land Rover Series I 1948 (HUE 166).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:49, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]