User talk:Spurzem/Archive 8

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kloster Maria Engelport – inside.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kloster Maria Engelport – view to organ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kloster Maria Engelport – chapel with the miraculous image.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Please remain calm and collegial

---

It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

Relative to that unfortunate comment Ruthven (msg) 20:40, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Ich weiß nicht, wovon Sie sprechen. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:49, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kloster Maria Engelport – miraculous image.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Verkündigungsgruppe - Erzengel Gabriel (2014-08-30 Spu).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a bit of noise, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 18:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculptures of Alte Kapelle (Mülheim-Kärlich).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Very nice picture very good subject. Can you add a caption in English and geocoding?--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

 Question What geocoding do you want? The sculptures come from the Old Chapel in Mulheim-Kärlich but since many years they are in the Mittelrhein-Museum of Koblenz. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 05:52, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

 Done Geocoding from Mittelrhein-Museum

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:03, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculptures of Alte Kapelle (Mülheim-Kärlich).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Very nice picture very good subject. Can you add a caption in English and geocoding?--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

 Done Geocoding from Mittelrhein-Museum

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Port of Ferryboat Schängel in Koblenz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Helmut Dähne at Nürburgring, Südkehre.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:43, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stirling Moss in 1977 at Nürburgring, Südkehre.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:12, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:31, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Juan Manuel Fangio in 1986 at Nürburgring, home stretch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:02, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. 0

Ezarateesteban 22:37, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hermann Lang at Nürburgring, home stretch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Fine! --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:14, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --Mile (talk) 18:09, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Walter Villa at Nürburgring, beginning sector Hatzenbach.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Niki Lauda in 1976 at Nürburgring Südkehre.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:33, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Joakim Bonnier with Cooper Maserati at Nürburgring.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DKW F102 at museum mobile, Ingolstadt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:34, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DKW F5 from 1936 in Andernach.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:35, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ford Model T built in 1912.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Big scope but obviously the best! --Palauenc05 (talk) 19:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:35, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Collections of the Mittelrhein-Museum in Koblenz – Madonna with Child from Bergkapelle Kärlich.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fiat 500 B "Topolino".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opel Admiral Cabriolet from 1937–39.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:43, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:08, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eddie Cheever at Nürburgring, start-finish line.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Certainly valuable and in wide use. Would even suggest to shorten the scope to Eddie Cheever at Nürburgring. --MB-one (talk) 13:25, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:01, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Automobile races at the Nürburgring – first race on new Grand Prix track in 1984.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gothic statues of Madonna and Child with Saint Anne in Rhineland-Palatinate – „Anna selbdritt“ in Wehr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:32, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Loreley (ship, 1963) on Rhine.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I think that it still needs a geo-location. If you can't remember exactly where it was, give an approximate location and add a note of the uncertainty such as "within 50 km of the stated location"). I also suggest that you mention that the ship was sunk in 2002 which is why no more photos of it can be taken. Martinvl (talk) 21:13, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

 Done Thank you. I thought the location must be exactly to a few meters only. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:37, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support I am happy to support this image as in my view it is the best in Commons for the specified scope and that it mets the six specified criteria for a valued image. (For the record, I added the English language text to the description). Martinvl (talk) 20:40, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

@Martinvl: Thank you! -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:43, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Markgräfliches Opernhaus Bayreuth – prince box.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:18, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gothic statue of Madonna and Child with Saint Anne in Kloster Maria Engelport.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It would take a caption in English. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
  English caption added, good picture, used and  Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abbaye de Saint-Maurice d'Agaune – church-tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:21, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
BMW 328 in competition driven by Adolf Brudes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:15, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wallfahrtskirche Klausen – miraculous image, 15. century.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wallfahrtskirche Klausen – miraculous image, 17. century.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:10, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mallet lokomotive 11sm – front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope and Used -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mallet lokomotive 11sm – rear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope and Useful -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope.--Peulle (talk) 22:14, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mallet lokomotive 11sm with railway carriages.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:07, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Powerboat drivers: Portrait of Kurt Mischke.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sima-Violet racing car, front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:02, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Powerboat drivers: Portrait of Kurt Mischke.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Motorboat racing people: Racing boat driver Kurt Mischke before starting on Mosel at Brodenbach.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - The English word is "before" (spelling corrected), but I think that for this to be a VI, you need to clearly indicate in the file description which of the 5 men is Kurt Mischke. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: In the file description I wrote in parentheses that the man at the left is Kurt Mischke. Further you can know him because of wearing a life-jacket. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:52, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

I don't understand. This is the complete "Description" line I'm seeing for the file: Deutsch: Kurt Mischke (links). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:58, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Yes, that's right. You see Kurt Mischke (left). That he is a racing boat driver we can see by the typical boats and his life-jacket. But perhaps I should add some information in the description. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:50, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

 Done O. K. now? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:06, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Yes, fine. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Motorboat racing people: Hans-Georg Krage on Mosel in Brodenbach.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:27, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Borgward automobile dashboards: Borgward Hansa 2400.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 21:33, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Capricorn4049 (talk) 01:24, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Borgward automobile dashboards: Borgward Hansa 2400 II.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:30, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Capricorn4049 (talk) 01:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Borgward automobile dashboards: Borgward Isabella Coupé.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

The Borgward Isabella Coupé was one of the most beautiful German cars for me.

 Support useful --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Capricorn4049 (talk) 01:32, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Borgward automobile dashboards: Borgward Hansa 1500.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:30, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Capricorn4049 (talk) 01:35, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Auxiliary bishop Alfred Kleinermeilert at a model makers' exhibition in 1975.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. Who's the man with the model ship? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:23, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Capricorn4049 (talk) 22:02, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Auxiliary bishop Robert Brahm preaching in 2008 in the cathedral of Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Capricorn4049 (talk) 22:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued image promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mallet lokomotive 11sm – Manufacturer's plate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:05, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

-- -- DeFacto (talk). 18:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hannelore Werner in her Formula Vee car at Nürburging.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Capricorn4049 (talk) 21:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hannelore Werner in 1969.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support why not using the more general scope Hannelore Werner? --Capricorn4049 (talk) 00:56, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support @Capricorn4049: Because we can promote the scoop Hannelore Werner in evening dress 1970 . Lothar must have this picture. A too general scope ruins diversity. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

 Comment I thought it would be helpful to say that Hannelore Werner is not any woman but a racing driver around 50 years ago. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:23, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

 Comment @Archaeodontosaurus and Spurzem: I stronlgy disagree. We don't need a diversity of scopes, we need scopes that define a generic field or category within which an image is the most valuable example. Please read Commons:Valued image scope and particularly How to choose your scope. Scope is not a simple description of an image - think of scope as being akin to a Commons Category. Would you create a Category named German racing driver Hannelore Werner in 1969, Hannelore Werner in evening dress 1970 or Cardinal Julio Terrazas Sandoval (at the left) and bishop Stephan Ackermann in Trier?

The scope should be so, that someone might realistically be looking for an image to illustrate. You would maybe search for an image to illustrate Hannelore Werner or Cardinal Julio Terrazas Sandoval, maybe even Cardinal Julio Terrazas Sandoval in Trier.

Please note also that VI is an award. If you choose your scope narrow enough that it is more a description than a scope, you could nominate and promote every picture on Commons to be a VI and that would reduce the value of the award (and the exclusiveness of promoted pictures till this day) to zero. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 18:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

@Capricorn4049: Mein Englisch genügt, um zu verstehen, was Du schreibst; ich kann aber Deinem Gedankengang beim besten Willen nicht folgen. Wenn jemand ein Bild von Hannelore Werner sucht, braucht er ohnehin keinen Scope von VI. Er gibt bei Google den Namen ein und findet sie. Im Übrigen wurde ich kürzlich erst aufgefordert, die Scopes präziser zu formulieren. Du magst das aber nicht. Allmählich fühle ich mich hier veralbert. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 18:44, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

@Spurzem: Ich erkläre es dir gerne auch auf Deutsch: Es geht nicht darum, dass jemand ein Bild von Hannelore Werner sucht und findet. Den findet er (mit hunderten von anderen) auf jeden Fall, wenn du es auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite gut beschreibst. Bei VI geht es darum jemandem zu helfen, der das beste Bild von Hannelore Werner auf Commons sucht. Also nochmals: Wenn jemand in den VI's nach Hannelore Werner sucht, soll das beste Bild von ihm erscheinen, ohne dass er noch die anderen hundert Bilder durchschauen muss (es ist mir auch klar, dass es in diesem Fall nicht 100 andere Bilder von Hannelore Werner gibt auf Commons, aber nur zum Beispiel). Es wird jedoch nie jemand nach Deutscher Rennfahrer Hannelore Werner im 1969 mit blauem Hut und gelber Jacke nach links schauend suchen.

Ausserdem ist die Auszeichnung und der Wert deines Bildes viel höher, wenn es das Beste in einem generelleren scope ist als wenn es nur das beste in einem Spezialfall vom Spezialfall vom Spezialfall ist. Und der Wert der Auszechung an sicht geht auch völlig verloren, wenn man jeden Schei.. nominieren kann. Verstehst du das? --Capricorn4049 (talk) 19:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Es hat nichts mit meinem Englisch zu tun. Ich kann Deiner Argumentation auch nicht folgen, wenn Du sie auf Deutsch schreibst. Ich wollte in dem Scope lediglich den Betrachtern hier sagen, dass Hannelore Werner nicht irgendein Mädel ist, sondern eine ehemalige Rennfahrerin. Denn nicht jeder weiß das, Du vielleicht, ich ebenfalls, viele andere nicht. Von blauer Mütze und gelber Jacke steht da übrigens nichts. Des Weiteren weiß ich nicht, wie unsere Scopes jemandem helfen sollen, der bestimmte Bilder sucht. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:32, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

• @Capricorn4049: Your reflection on this subject goes through a phase of clarification of the scope. I stopped there too a moment in the past. But we must consider that we must manage more than 42 million images and help people find their way. We must create categories and sometimes very narrow (the name of a painting in a museum because there are several versions in the world, or a subspecies of animal). The scope is not just the description of an image, it is not the expression of the category that contains the image (Some images have more than 12 categories); the scope is all here at once and we must also anticipate the evolution. A well-done scope answers these problems. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

"German racing driver Hannelore Werner in 1969" is not a scope, it's a description. The scope for this image could be "Hannelore Werner in 1969" or even "Portrait of Hannelore Werner". Until this is resolved, I have to say  Oppose --MB-one (talk) 19:02, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Per MB-one --Capricorn4049 (talk) 19:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Done. Nevertheless incredible! -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from German racing driver Hannelore Werner in 1969 to Hannelore Werner in 1969 --Capricorn4049 (talk) 20:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Far better --Capricorn4049 (talk) 20:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --MB-one (talk) 20:30, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Capricorn4049 (talk) 21:11, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John Surtees in 1965 with Ferrari 320 P2 at Nürburgring.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former locomotive engine VI of Brohltalbahn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 21:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Achilles-Sport, front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Goliath Goli pickup truck.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:43, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cardinal Julio Terrazas Sandoval (at the left) and bishop Stephan Ackermann in Trier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - I think this is a more useful picture of the cardinal. Is the scope including both the cardinal and the bishop an important one? I would need an explanation of why. Also, I think in your file description, you should tell viewers who don't know that the cardinal is on the left side with the bishop on the right. -- Ikan Kekek ( talk) 06:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

The cardinal is the man with red robe. I think that is general known. Further cardinal and bishop are named in the order from left to right. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

I don't think you addressed my point that the other photo is a more useful one of just the cardinal. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

I don't understand what you mean. Can you show me a better image of cardinal Terrazas Sandoval together with bishop Stephan Ackermann in the streets of Trier? I can not imagine. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:33, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Why is a photo of both of them together an important scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:13, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

I mean, it very well might be, but it would be good for you to explain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:02, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose per Ikan Kekek. The scope is far to specific. A VI of the cardinal would be useful, but we don't need a VI for every cardinal with every bishop in every street of the world. And no, not everyone knows that cardinals wear red robe. If you name them from left to right, you have to state that you did so. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 23:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Laughable! -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 07:56, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support No problem for me. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:29, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support That scope is absolutely OK. --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:56, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

 Comment @Palauenc05: I strongly disagree. Please see Special:Diff/263812721 --Capricorn4049 (talk) 18:38, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose The scope should be for either the cardinal or the bishop, but not both. Martinvl (talk) 15:38, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

@Martinvl: Can you please explain why only an image with one named person can be valuable? And can you tell me where I can read such a laughable rule? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 17:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

@Spurzem: If you visit Commons:Valued image scope#Links in the scope you will see the advice "Try to limit yourself to one link per scope, if possible. Only the most specific part of the scope should be linked;". In this case there are two people, both of whom warrant a scope - the cardinal and the bishop (assuming that this is the best image of each of them). In such cases, the image could be submitted as a VI twice, once for each person.

The meeting between Cardinal Sandoval and Bishop Ackermann had little significance at the global level, so is not worthy of a scope in its own right. If however the image depicted a historic occasion such as this meeting, then the scope would refer to the meeting rather than to the three individuals concerned.

Does this explain things? Martinvl (talk) 19:52, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

No! For only the most specific part is linked as wished in the rule. Further: I am surprised that you feel able to rate the meeting between cardinal Tarrazas Sandoval and bishop Ackermann. It was the jubilee of 50 years partnership between bishopric of Trier and Bolivia for helping many thousands of poor people. But referring to particularity: A few days ago an image of any endive in any garden was promoted. And what about the houses in any streets which could be photographed at any time once more and perhaps better? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:28, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Why didn't you give this background before? I see now that it's in the German-language file description, but when I asked you days ago to explain why this was an important scope, you refused to do so. It would really help if you had less of a chip on your shoulder and were quicker to respond to questions. Now that you've finally given an excellent argument for this scope, I  Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:20, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: Thank you for your answer and your vote. Some days ago I was told that scopes must be short. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

I wasn't asking you to make the scope longer, just to explain in this thread why it was an important scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:45, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical images of Heligoland, Oberland around 1929/30.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful scope and picture is best in scope --Capricorn4049 (talk) 12:14, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porsche Typ 64 – side-view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:44, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculptures in Bad Wörishofen: „Innere Harmonie“ by Heinrich Faltermeier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Peulle (talk) 18:36, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:23, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bassenheimer Reiter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and widely used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:58, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbarossa (ship, 1903) in 1958.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Why is this picture better than the other two in the category? This picture is cropped, the other two show the whole ship. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 22:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Schikanöse Frage und trotzdem eine Antwort: … weil es ein Bild aus den 1950er-Jahren ist, nachdem das Schiff wieder aufgebaut worden war, und kein Scan von Vorkriegszeitungsbildern. Ich wüsste nicht, dass es von diesem Dampfer in den Commons ein weiteres Bild aus der Nachkriegszeit gäbe. Es heute noch einmal besser zu fotografieren ist nicht möglich, weil es 1972 verschrottet wurde. Aber wenn Du meinst, das Foto für unbrauchbar erklären zu müssen: Nur zu! So macht Zusammenarbeit (sollte es hier doch geben?) richtig Spaß! -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 06:59, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

 Comment That's exactly what I mean. When you realize, that your picture will not be promoted in the (by the way very useful) scope Barbarossa (ship, 1903) because there are other pictures of other authors that show the ship better, you change the scope to the more descriptive scope Barbarossa (ship, 1903) in 1958 and if that is not enough to Barbarossa (ship, 1903) in 1958 from left. With that method, one could nominate and promote every picture on commons and that reduces the value of VI. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 10:58, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Du drehst und wendest es, wie Du es brauchst, um ein Bild madig zu machen. Anders ist es nicht zu erklären, warum nicht sowohl ein gescanntes Zeitungsbild des Schiffs vor der Zerstörung als auch ein Foto aus der Zeit nach der Restaurierung wertvoll sein kann. Und was den Scope betrifft: Kürzlich wurde bei einem Auto noch darauf hingewiesen, dass angegeben werden müsse, ob es von vorn oder von hinten zu sehen sei. Bei einem Schiff sind entsprechende Angaben offenbar unzulässig. Schließlich noch einmal zum Begriff „valuable“ oder „wertvoll“: Eine Endivie, in irgendeinem Garten fotografiert, zum Beispiel ist VI; das einzige Nachkriegsbild in den Commons von einem Rheindampfer nicht. So ist es wohl zu erklären, dass 88 % der hier vorgestellten Fotos als wertvoll eingestuft werden. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:30, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Sorry, but I can't support this scope. I couldn't find any information about the ship in google and your link in "Used in" is broken, therefore I can't verify that the ship was destroyed during the first or second world war and restored afterwards. If so, and if you want by hook or crook enforce a VI for this picture, the scope Barbarossa (ship, 1903) after restoration or similar would maybe be useful. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 21:01, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

@Capricorn4049: Ist ja in Ordnung. Trotzdem: Um etwas über das Schiff zu erfahren, müsstest Du in de:Liste der Schiffe der Köln-Düsseldorfer Deutsche Rheinschiffahrt schauen. Ist aber egal. Zeichnet Salatköpfe und irgendwelche kaum bekannten Häuser aus, die man zum Teil vor lauter Bäumen nur schwer erkennen kann, und der Sinn und Zweck von Valued Images ist erfüllt. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:10, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

 Support Scope OK for me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:40, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Best picture quality in this scope. However, if the ship was destroyed during the war and rebuilt, this should be mentioned in the description. --HeinrichStuerzl (talk) 18:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued image promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculptures in Bad Wörishofen: "Warwick Rex" by Heinrich Faltermeier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:58, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

-- -- DeFacto (talk). 07:15, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DKW F1, Limousine, front, im museum mobile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:07, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 17:44, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Horch 853 Cabriolet (four seater), front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 17:44, 31 October 2017 (UTC)