User talk:Vasyatka1/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Подкарпатская Русь (1939).svg

  • Не «граница Карпатской Украины с Польшей и Словакией», а «Современная граница Украины с Польшей и Словакией». После «Территория» запятая. — Klimenok (talk) 06:32, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
✓ Done --Vasyatka1 (talk) 08:10, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

You're welcome Túrelio. It's easy like take a candy from a baby... --Vasyatka1 (talk) 08:26, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 17:55, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Memorial to the 6th Company in Cherekha (1).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Clarissy. 22:25, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Clarissy. 22:35, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Хорошая идея, но непонятно, как включать туда собственно ист. центр Спб. Он сейчас никак не выделен на уровне категорий, а включать весь город в категорию "исторический центр этого города" - неправильно, т.к. город шире, чем его ист. центр. Так что я пока сделал по-другому. --Kaganer (talk) 16:29, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Здравствуйте! А как быть с объектами в Петергофе, Пушкине, Павловске, Ломоносове, Гатчине? --Vasyatka1 (talk) 16:38, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
О! Вижу Вы уже нашли решение. Спасибо! Так даже лучше. --Vasyatka1 (talk) 16:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Ну да. неидеально, но примерно то, что там и должно быть. Я добавил в каком-то виде пп. 1-20 (до Ломоносова включительно), 23, 24. Остальное нужно смотреть более тщательно. --Kaganer (talk) 16:57, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Taras Shevchenko monument in Dneprodzerzhinsk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Evil Russian (talk) 05:08, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Ул.Свердлова.jpg

Hi, you've requested renaming for this file in English. We normally do not rename non-English to English. Muzammil (talk) 16:11, 29 May 2014 (UTC).

Renamed as I disagree with User:Hindustanilanguage in this case. Using latin transcription of cyrillic alphabet in street name would make the name readable to wider community. Ankry (talk) 19:40, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
By doing this, you have grossly violated Which files should not be renamed? # 2: "Files should NOT be renamed only because the filename is not English and/or is not correctly capitalized (Remember, Commons is a multilingual project, so there's no reason to favor English over other languages)." By doing this you are killing geographically limited languages. Will you also rename File:ఎన్నికల_ప్రచార_సామగ్రి_దుకాణము.jpg by the same yardstick? --Muzammil (talk) 06:43, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for disturbing. Maybe I choosed wrong reason but I still think that files like this are need to be renamed. First of all - original name was not unique, in former USSR-countries we have hundreds streets named after Yakov Sverdlov (ул. Свердлова = Sverdlova street). Thats why I proposed more specific name of the file. --Vasyatka1 (talk) 10:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

hello!

please be careful and do not remove the categories. thank you! --アンタナナ 11:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

  • Здравствуйте. Спасибо. Если честно, то я не вижу надобности в безликих служебных категориях типа "Uploaded with UploadWizard" или "Uploaded via Campaign:..." - в чём их смысл? --Vasyatka1 (talk) 11:26, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
File:20-й батальон территориальной обороны Днепропетровской области.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kwasura (talk) 10:26, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:05, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi, you have requested for renaming. But such a request is not consistent with renaming rules, look at Commons:File renaming. Files should NOT be renamed only because the filename is not English. Remember, Commons is a multilingual project, so there's no reason to favor English over other languages. For changing the language of the name can ask the uploader of this file. But maybe he would like them to be in his native language? The uploader's will is most important. If the name is meaningless or ambiguous, change it, but do not change the language. The uploader wanted to keep his native language, respect it, please.
I saw some files with your request were renamed by not experienced filemovers... But it wasn't correct. They shouldn't do this. Filemover may lose entitlements, if acts against the rules.
It would be better if you change your filename request.
Thanks in advance! Wieralee (talk) 18:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

@Vasyatka1: I declined your requests. Please, stop creating rename requests until reaching a consensus in this topic. --sasha (krassotkin) 18:49, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

@Wieralee: Hello! The point is that there is a contradiction in renaming guidelines. On the one hand, criterion #2 clearly states that meaningless filenames should be changed, and all files that I proposed for renaming fully met criterion. Moreover there is no obligation in this criterion to use the same language in renaming procedure of ambiguous or meaningless filenames. On the another hand, in these guidelines is mentioned that files should NOT be renamed only because the filename is not English and/or is not correctly capitalized. The point is that the my reason for files renaming was to give a correct description of object shown on the picture and not a cosmetic change of file name. What's more important the amendment of filename with a ambiguous or meaningless name or saving of it for sake of uploader's will? --Vasyatka1 (talk) 20:53, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

  • @Vasyatka1: each name can be more descriptive... when you are acting against the particular language on Commons you can always find anything to improve... and remove this language from Commons :( We are just trying to protect other languages.

You can always add an English description inside the file: {{en| }}. Our browser is searching in descriptions, too.
Vasyatka1: I don't want to figth. It would be great for all of us to act in a spirit of understanding, tolerance and respect for the dignity of other nations. That is why we are all Commons volunteers :-) Thanks for understanding. Wieralee (talk) 22:05, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Call of Heroes (2016)

Приглашаю к созданию фоторепортажа в Викиновостях, на основе этой категории: Category:Call of Heroes (2016). На мой взгляд, должно получиться интересно. Трудов там немного - несколько абзацев текста и избранные фотографии из галереи. Примеры: n:ru:Молодые журналисты Стерлитамака изучают тонкости профессии, n:ru:В Уфе состоялся праздник башкирского национального костюма (или в категории n:ru:Категория:Фоторепортажи). Если нужна будет какая помощь там подскажем. Можно прям там на мою СО писать или на форум. --sasha (krassotkin) 07:06, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Добрый день! Даже не думал об этом. Сейчас хочу закончить заливку / сортировку фото. Их там ещё несколько десятков. Потом посмотрим. За приглашение - спасибо. Приятно. --Vasyatka1 (talk) 07:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Rename request

Hello.

I am a bit surprised by your recent rename request = you claim to be the original uploader of a file when you are not!!--Muzammil (talk) 19:37, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Good day! As you can see I asked for renaming of recently re-uploaded file. Uncut version was uploaded by me. --Vasyatka1 (talk) 19:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Aleksander Yevgenyevich Fersman (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ivan Vtorov (talk) 10:36, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Churches and cultural heritage monuments

Hello. A church can be a monument and can be not a monument, so such edits do not seem to be correct. Stas (talk) 20:15, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

  • Добрый день! Я понимаю, но церкви кроме собственной категории дублировались также в категории культурного наследия. Я посчитал это излишним. // Good day! I see but in this case the churches in addition to the own category were duplicated in the category of cultural heritage. I considered it excessive. --Vasyatka1 (talk) 20:23, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Все церкви, которые сейчас есть в категории Churches in Bohuslav Raion, действительно являются памятниками культурного наследия, но ведь там могут появиться и фото других. Stas (talk) 21:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
      • Посмотрел как в других областях Украины. Подумал над Вашими словами. Можно откатить мои правки. Ничего не имею против. Мне просто показалось несколько нелепо создавать дублирующие друг друга категории, ведь в категории "Богуславский район" было до моего вмешательства 4 категории, две из которых повторяли друг друга. С другой стороны, развивая Вашу логику, если церковь старая, то она (на 99,9%) будет памятником культурного наследия, если новая - её надо удалять за нарушение свободы панорамы :) --Vasyatka1 (talk) 16:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC)