User talk:Dharmadhyaksha/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Administrator

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ +/−

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Dharmadhyaksha, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and Commons:Deletion requests), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons on irc.freenode.net. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

+1. Congratulations! Jee 14:55, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Congratulations. Alan (talk) 16:25, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Congrats! If you need help with anything, let me know. The best advice I can give you is if you think a deletion, block, or protection is the right thing to do, than do it, and don't worry too much about it. You'll be wrong once in a while, but that's why there's undelete, unblock, and unprotect. Also, you'll want to go to Preferences/Gadgets/Tools for authorized users and enable all the deletion-related gadgets. Take care. INeverCry 23:50, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Please restore

Please restore my files, it was licensed and sourced correctly thank you --Eng. M.Bandara-Talk 14:22, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Centro Olimpico.jpg

For the love of God please will you put this file back? It had a proper fair use rationale for a logo but some automated piece of shit put a speedy tag on it. Then you came along and obviously didn't look at it properly. Why can't nerds stop making these automated pieces of crap? They never work properly! Nerds, you are NOT as smart as you think you are. These nerds are bit-by-bit rolling back the core principle of Wikipedia which is that anyone can edit. Folk should not have to negiotiate a million-and-one half-baked automated nerd-bots any time they want to add content. This rant is not directed at you, Dharmadhyaksha, you've just been a bit lazy and inept on this occasion. Please correct your sloppy error and undelete the file. And save me the trouble of uploading it again another way in five minutes' time. Thank you. Målfarlig! (talk) 14:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Snivelling apology time Dharmadhyaksha :- it appears I was lazy, inept and sloppy on this occasion, not you. Of course the logo should go on wikipedia but not commons. Huge apologies for any offence caused by my intemperate rant. Also apologies to any bot building nerds who do a splendid job most of the time, and always have the best intentions. Målfarlig! (talk) 14:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Apology accepted.
From the Tips for Novice Internet Users, Chapter 1, Page 2: "Make sure the url you are at is actually the url you want to be. There are plenty similar looking web pages which might confuse you. A quick url check can save you from embarrassment and awkward situations. You don't want to end up sending lovey-dovey smoochy messages openly to your ex instead of your current love interest."
Clin §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 14:50, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Atlas.of.War.and.Tourism.jpeg

Hello. Very soon after I uploaded File:Atlas.of.War.and.Tourism.jpeg, you deleted it as "Copyright violation". This came as a surprise to me. Please see, and perhaps comment on, my undeletion request for this file. Thank you. -- Hoary (talk) 08:43, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Birds

I came across File:Names of birds in Marathi language compiled by Dr Raju Kasambe.pdf. Is this info available on mr.wiki in a list or article? Seems like a valuable resource. Perhaps mr.wikibooks or mr.wikisource should host this? INeverCry 04:43, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

@INeverCry: Thanks for the info. I will shift it somewhere. Will check with one user who has interests in birds. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:40, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mainpuri district.svg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mainpuri district.svg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Mainpuri district.svg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, 1989 20:05, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Aryavart Gramin Bank Barabanki Regional Office.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aryavart Gramin Bank Barabanki Regional Office.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely, 1989 16:53, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Vithun Ravindran

File:RJ Balaji Hiphop Tamizha Adhi.jpg, File:RJ Balaji Music Academy 2013.jpg, and File:Adhi & Jeeva Beatz.jpg are the works of photographer Vithun Ravindran, who has just sent a mail to OTRS confirming legal permission. As a member of OTRS, can you please check if it is well written, or tell me what more to do? (the mail contains "I, Vithun Ravindran, am the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of all the images in my Facebook page"). And one of the three images was uploaded by me, not counting the cropped one. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:41, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

License Review

Hellow Sir, I would like to request you to pass the License Review of this file.

Hoping the best. Thank You--Roshan014 (talk) 13:45, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Hellow Sir, I have another request for you,I would like to request you to pass the License Review of this file to p[ut this file int the Bio Article of this person Tanya Sharma who is in this pic.

File:Tanya-Sharma-Stills.jpg Hoping the best. Thank You--Roshan014 (talk) 19:51, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 19:16, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Review Request

Hopefully --Roshan014 (talk) 15:24, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 14:46, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Baeyer-Emmerling indole synthesis.jpg

File:Baeyer-Emmerling indole synthesis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

DMacks (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Baeyer-Emmerling indole reaction mechanism.jpg

File:Baeyer-Emmerling indole reaction mechanism.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

DMacks (talk) 14:37, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

please review this upload for me

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Karan_Singh_Grover_Alone_Trailer_Launch.png

regards

Bots


You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Those picture are of my own work. Why are you asking for deletion ?

(moved over from userpage) Why did you change the title of my picture ? And why do you ask for deleting ? This is my own work. Stop arguing my copyright on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pascal KESHMIRI (talk • contribs)

File:Michelle Photo In PNG Format.png

I uploaded the file following commons rule to the best of my knowledge, why would it be deleted, may I ask ? I already left the same message in "User:Túrelio"'s talk page. I would greatly appreciate it if either one of you give me a response. JW19335762743 (talk) 09:21, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Michelle Chen In PNG Format 3.png

I uploaded the file following commons rule to the best of my knowledge, why would it be deleted, may I ask ? I already left the same message in "User:Túrelio"'s talk page. I would greatly appreciate it if either one of you give me a response. JW19335762743 (talk) 09:23, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

I responded already 8 minutes ago. --Túrelio (talk) 09:25, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

File:20150116082947 save.jpg and File:MAU IG.jpg

I notice you deleted File:20150116082947 save.jpg as a copyright violation, but your deletion summary didn't say why. File:MAU IG.jpg is pretty much the same photo. Can you see if it's a copyright violation as well, and if so, delete it too? Thanks, Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:11, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi User:Jackmcbarn! Sorry for late response. I was tring to hunt down the image. The previous image was taken from twitter. https://twitter.com/mau08us I tried to find it again, but couldn't. (Man! She uploads so many selfies!!!) I have hence added a "no permission" tag for now. Thanks for pointing out this file. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

File:1971 Instrument of Surrender.jpg

Can you check the status of this OTRS ticket, cover all Indian Navy images? I ask since their website says copyright 2009, and there's no review process unlike BH for these OTRS tickets which are added along with upload. cheers —SpacemanSpiff 13:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Sorry @SpacemanSpiff: ! Am no longer OTRS member. I don't get much time to work on those queues. But about your doubt on review process; that's a valid one and its been taken up here at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Indian_navy_images. Btw, aren't you OTRS member too? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 13:32, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Ah, I also am no longer on OTRS owing to my long absence from all projects, including OTRS. I'll probably reapply if/when I become reasonably active again. I'll follow the noticeboard discussion. —SpacemanSpiff 14:21, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

TNT_Economia_-_Wile_E._Coyote.jpg being deleted

This is a drawing I made with a friend in 1992. While it is based on a roadrunner character, it was used for a student movement, TNT, and necessary for the article related.

Please review the decision and thanks for you work. Mgoldfeld (talk) 11:31, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

VANESSA ALFARO

Could you please restore my files:

File:Vanessa Alfaro.jpg File:VANESSA ALFARO logo.jpg File:Vanessa Alfaro - FIFA World Cup (3).jpg File:Vanessa Alfaro FIFA World cup.jpg File:Vanessa Alfaro (3).jpg

I own 100% of the rights of the images and logos I uploaded. Thank you so much.

Vanessa Alfaro 06/30/15 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kval83 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 30 June 2015‎ (UTC)

File:Methagu Velupillai Prabhakaran.jpg

Can you take care of this and other copyvios by the same user. He's repeatedly adding on en.wiki. cheers —SpacemanSpiff 09:08, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Voronezh-airport-december-2012.jpg

I came across this file when I was looking for the contribution of a sock of a globally blocked user, User:व्लादिस्लाव. This sock nominated this file for speedy deletion, first removing the license and then claiming it has no license. The file was originally uploaded from Flickr, got Flickrreiewed, and I checked again that the Flickr license is good. Therefore I restored the file. However, if you know more, please feel free to FFD the file. (Speedy would probably not be appropriate given the bad faith of the user who already speedied many files uploaded as {{Own}} work).--Ymblanter (talk) 15:24, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Band_A5.jpg

Hi, Just now I saw a deletion request of the image file Band_A5.jpg. There is no intention of promoting and advertising the Bengali band A5. I am providing the facts about this distinguished and popular contemporary and folk fusion band A5. I took the picture on the day of the release of A5's folk fusion album "Folkus" at Citi Center, Kolkata. This picture is nothing but a group photo of all the members of A5. I own this image file and also have necessary permission to use it form the members of A5. So there is no copyright issue and therefore I used it in Wikipedia. All the true music lovers in and beyond Bengal (Kolkata, West Bengal, India) should know more about this band A5. I request you to reconsider and please do not delete this image file.

I appreciate your kind cooperation. Thanks in advance. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwiki100 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 23 July 2015‎ (UTC)

Hi! I have moved your comment on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Band A5.jpg. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:08, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Long Drive (Album by A5).jpg

Hi, Just now I found the image file "Long Drive (Album by A5).jpg" had been deleted by you. I have started creating an article on Bengali band A5. There is no intention of promoting and advertising the band A5. I am providing the facts about this distinguished and popular contemporary and folk fusion band A5. In order to complete the article and provide enough evidence to support my article I need this picture. This is the picture of the front cover of their debut album "Long Drive". The image file has been handed over to me by A5. I have received necessary permission form all the members of A5, to use this image file in the article I am preparing now. So there is no copyright issue. I own the rights of this image. As a matter of fact some of the contents like artwork and texts were designed and provided to A5 by me. All the true music lovers in and beyond Bengal (Kolkata, West Bengal, India) should know more about this band A5. I request you to reconsider and please do not delete this image file.

I truly appreciate your kind cooperation. I need your support so that I can complete the article and contribute in Wikipedia. Thanks in advance. --Jwiki100 (talk) 16:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Folkus (Album by A5).jpg

Hi, Just now I found the image file "Folkus (Album by A5).jpg" had been deleted by you. I have started creating an article on Bengali band A5. There is no intention of promoting and advertising the band A5. I am providing the facts about this distinguished and popular contemporary and folk fusion band A5. In order to complete the article and provide enough evidence to support my article I need this picture. This is the picture of the front cover of their 2015 folk fusion album "Folkus". The image file has been handed over to me by A5. I have received necessary permission form all the members of A5, to use this image file in the article I am preparing now. So there is no copyright issue. I own the rights of this image. As a matter of fact some of the contents like artwork and texts were designed and provided to A5 by me. All the true music lovers in and beyond Bengal (Kolkata, West Bengal, India) should know more about this band A5. I request you to reconsider and please do not delete this image file.

I truly appreciate your kind cooperation. I need your support so that I can complete the article and contribute in Wikipedia. Thanks in advance.--Jwiki100 (talk) 16:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

re: Tip of the day: Category

Hi!
Thanks for the tips. Excuse me, do you know if there is any tool to mass upload images, which all can share the same description and category? petrohs (gracias) 04:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

@PetrohsW: Hi! I use Special:UploadWizard. In the first tab you can select multiple images for uploading and when you reach the 3rd tab of "Describe" while uploading, you will be asked to fill all description. There, you can also add categories in the form where categories are actually meant to be. After that there is an option of copying all the information to other images too. So all description, categories, geocode, etc. is automatically copied on all images. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:57, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Tamil Eelam stuff

I came across some insertions in the Tamils article on en.wiki and coming here I found some derivative stuff of Eelam/LTTE that's been resting in Commons for 3-4 years now. I've tagged for copyvio, but I think there's more to this problem that I'm not seeing. As neither Sodabottle or I have been active on en.wiki for a while, a lot of this sort of copyvio has been added to en.wiki and given that the images aren't there, no one has been checking. Just alerting you, perhaps to see if you can also "search" for this. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 05:44, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

You can find some more at here, and here. This File:AQMI Flag.svg too? What about other flag such as country flags? Are they uploaded with permission? @SpacemanSpiff: --AntanO 08:22, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
The problem with Eelam flags is that the "logos" for want of a better word have been created by different groups and therefore not in public domain. Country flags have separate flag codes that govern the copyright. —SpacemanSpiff 11:13, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:30, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

please restore Win8 infographic final.png

i know for a fact i did not do copyright infringement on uploading this file i have already request deletion it did not happen and i know the image is under a free license the image is under Attribution 3.0 United States (CC BY 3.0 US)

here is the undeletion request conversation below

I am requesting restoration of the file i can understand why you would delete the image but this specific image is from here http://www.fsf.org/windows8 i have checked the image license on the image it says this work produced by the free software foundation is under CC By 3.0 U.S license. I am very sure this image is under a free license approved by Wikimedia commons here is the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/--Jonnymoon96 (talk) 16:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi! In fact, we have two licenses at http://www.fsf.org/windows8 = (1.) Copyright © 2004-2015 Free Software Foundation + (2.) "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 license (or later version)"my underline = CC BY-ND 3.0. Both are not compatible with COM:L... but... wait: from this site, you mean this image here: http://static.fsf.org/nosvn/windows8/win8_infographic_web.png ?? Well, indeed we have a byline (see bottom of the image) saying that it is

w:en:Creative Commons
attribution
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

. This is a little bit confusional. Let's wait for another [admin] opinion, also to check if the deleted file corresponds to the file I am guessing... Gunnex (talk) 20:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC) The image that you linked to is the image i am talking about and is the image that got deleted.--Jonnymoon96 (talk) 16:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

please restore File:Shoin University2.jpg

We are still discussing the copyright issues of Shoin University2.jpg. Please do not remove this photo before we reach a conclusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Models of My Life (talk • contribs) 04:24, 28 July 2015‎ (UTC)

You may continue your discussion of File talk:Shoin University2.jpg at Commons:Undeletion requests. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:34, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Cynocyno

Saw that you reverted the image on en.wiki, the user has just been uploading webgrabs after minor modification as own work; had to get another of their Kalam pics deleted yesterday. —SpacemanSpiff 12:24, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. Will keep an eye on him. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:31, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

I made both capricornie.svg and capricornffd.png, please remove copyright claim, as I made them. AmericanEnki (talk) 04:13, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Media needing categories

Hello. I was working... usually wait a while 'before performing operations. Ciao. --Discanto (talk) 14:11, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi @Discanto: I didn't know you were working. We have tones of images in Category:Media needing categories and I usually work in this field trying to clean a tiny fraction of it everyday where new users simply upload and don't even know about what categories are. Sorry for inconvenience to you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:59, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Sheshrao Deshmukh.jpg

Hello, why you deleted File:Sheshrao Deshmukh.jpg? That photo was clicked by me, its my own work, what copyright violation you felt there? Thank you. --Human3015 (talk) 06:19, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Because it can be found on other websites from Google giving doubtful claims on your ownership. Also the resolution was quite small and lacked EXIF data. If you really have clicked it, you can email COM:OTRS with proofs and in the due time the image will be restored. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:10, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Don 2 Press Conference at 62nd Berlin International Film Festival.jpg

Hey! Actually I had uploaded a file from Bollywood Hungama and then cropped it. But, instead of the original, I mistakenly uploaded another picture from a site about which i don't know. So, please tell me what can be done. Thanks!Krish! (talk) 18:48, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Clan Crest - Duncan.jpg

Hi there,

You appear to have deleted this file before, and I just wanted to double-check if you know the source of the copyvio and if there were any other reason it was deleted for. I've received an OTRS ticket about this file, and just need to double-check something before it can be restored. Please ping me when you respond, as I don't often check my Common's watchlist. Thanks in advance, --Mdann52talk to me! 21:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

@Mdann52: Sorry for late reply. The copyvio reason stated by User:Wdchk for this file was Uploader states here that the image is his own work but has stated on his English Wikipedia talk page that it is not. He is currently blocked on English Wikipedia for uploading similar images multiple times in violation of copyright. This may actually be a derivative work of the original file on the web site listed below; it looks like it has been put through a fax machine or something like that, maybe to "justify" claim of own work??? |source=http://www.clan-duncan.co.uk/images/crests/andrew-duncan-crest.html. Hope this helps. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:17, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
@Dharmadhyaksha: Yes it does, thanks a lot! --Mdann52talk to me! 08:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
@Mdann52: When checking the user talk page referenced above, you'll need to look in the history for removed comments. (You don't need me to tell you that, but just to avoid any doubt!) See also: w:User talk:ADuncan42. Thanks. – Wdchk (discussion) 12:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Two sets of copyvios

I've tagged two sets, one was straightforward from User:Puli.jaipal, but the other there's a lot from User:Saifivns‎, all copied from this blog. Can you handle it or do you want me to waste time finding the individual source images? —SpacemanSpiff 06:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Have deleted files from both sets that you had tagged. The rest I tagged myself. Do you know this tool called Help:VisualFileChange.js? Helps a lot in mass-tagging of files. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I've used it in the past (there's an outstanding deletion discussion from me using that), but only now did I realize I can use it for copyvio tagging also. That'd be very useful as I've always tagged copyvios manually. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 12:19, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
You can use it to append any text also. That way you may categorize files using it, although Cat-a-lot is better in doing that. 12:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Switched to common from monobook and added it, and it seems to work (haven't done the full run through). cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 12:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Please restore picture "Memorial de Verdun logo quadri"

Please restore the picture "Memorial de Verdun logo quadri". It is the official new logo of the Verdun Memorial. Authorization by author is under way. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mémorial de Verdun (talk • contribs) 07:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

If the creator is releasing the logo under free licenses, then please follow the steps in COM:OTRS. The image will be restored then. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
@Dharmadhyaksha: We have already asked for the author's authorization after a French-speaking administrator (Lomita) asked for it and it was sent as requested. The image can now be restored. Thank you.--Mémorial de Verdun (talk) 17:55, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
@Mémorial de Verdun: sorry! I can't help much over here as i do not have the access to OTRS. If you have sent the email to OTRS, you will receive an email from them. Once everything is cleared the image will be restored. Please have patience. OTRS reviewing takes some time. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:57, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Tanya Gyani

Hi, what do you think of File:TanyaGyani.jpg? It doesn't look like "own work" to me but I can't spot a web version before the upload date. Could it have come from a magazine? - Sitush (talk) 09:38, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

@Sitush: I also couldn't find any web version. If you have doubt, given the user's history of editing or such, or even the quality of image, you can raise a DR. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:19, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Please restore

Please restore the Not a Feather but a Dot cover Image file, I am the copyright owner, and am attempting to link the new cover art of the film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avamax (talk • contribs) 01:17, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

@Avamax: Hi! If you are the copyright owner of the album, please follow the steps listed at COM:OTRS. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:28, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Something you might be interested in

I came across the images of en:Smita Sabharwal and en:Akun Sabharwal while looking around today. Thought you might be interested in the en.wiki articles! —SpacemanSpiff 04:48, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Abdul Ghafoor.jpg

File:Abdul Ghafoor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 13:12, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Image descriptions

Are these kind of parochial changes to descriptions right? I've seen that it's been done to a few image files by the same IP. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 14:12, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

@SpacemanSpiff: Actually Commons' scope focuses on the content that excludes file descriptions, galleries, and also categories. These are just for simplicity of searching. You may revert such edits if you see some agenda for promotion or vandal. But if reverted back you don't really have a case. Commons is just a dump and while organization of it necessary and important it really is not the major function. There were discussions about making "Featured Gallery" but those were concluded. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't exactly care about it beyond the fact that these are silly and in this case dumb as it changes from a factually correct description to a link that hides more information than provides. But I didn't revert for exactly this reason: I thought Commons was more accepting of this sort of crap, so no, I don't want to revert :) —SpacemanSpiff 07:34, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Please restore this image

Hello, you have removed this image => File:Nyle DiMarco - head shot.jpg citing a copyright violation. However, I contacted Mr DiMarco via his verified twitter and he specifically told me that he had this photo taken for his own portfolio and that he owns the copyright. This photo and four others were submitted to WikiCommons with his authorization attached. Why did you remove it / them? Thanks, SchoolMarm101 (talk) 16:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Sorry @SchoolMarm101: but the file description did not show any indication that permission was taken from the subject and the photographer. Please follow COM:OTRS procedures for this. We can restore the image after that. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:01, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Picture file Tehilla Blad.jpg

Hi

You deleted the picture File:Tehilla Blad.jpg claiming Copyright Violation. Why?

I uploaded this picture and stated that it's free to use since it's my own picture taken of my daughter Tehilla Blad by me. I as the photographer has no claims on the picture and Tehilla Blad as the person on the picture has no objections or claim for use.

Otherwise I can not understand what other rules are making this as a Copyright violation. I have also used it on Tehills's IMDB page but that doesn't make it as IMDB's property. So who has the copyright claim other than me?

Kind regards

Tobbe Blad --Eight-ch-dad (talk) 14:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Here's one for you to handle

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tha D.f4c3r indicates that Priya.wom (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  who has uploaded copyvios here is a sock. There's obviously some other stuff on en.wiki that now needs checking, but I nominated two images for deletion before I realized this, if I'd checked in advance I'd have just gone for a copyvio look at the other uploads. But you may want to look at all the other socks too. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 16:35, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Done! Blocked and tagged and copyvios deleted. Bed time now. Will hunt for more tomorrow. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 18:43, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

why did you remove an image File:Brij Bhoomi1.jpg . plz tell me answer Jschauhanyear2015

Rohitash Kumar Vicky (talk) 05:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Because it's a film poster and explicit permissions would be required from film producers/director/others involved to use this, which were missing. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Review request

Hi,

File:Aanand sagar Shegaon.JPG this file transfer has been tagged with a review request. The uploading user has updated licencing for Original uploaded file at mr-wp w:mr:File:Aanand sagar Shegaon.JPG . Since you are likely to be better aquianted with commons procedures, requesting to have a look and help update wherever possible.

Rgds Mahitgar (talk) 14:23, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

email

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. Check your email—you've got mail!
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

--The Avengers (talk) 11:33, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Image license

Author claims to have taken this picture himself but it seems to be from a website, which is obvious.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ActressSuru.jpg

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thank You for your help sir. I forgot to add categories, But you helped me in it. Thanks again! Th3snehasish (talk) 08:17, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

About Indian people collage

Hi, could you replace few images of people at 1) Replace Hrithik Roshan image by adding A. P. J. Abdul Kalam at row 5 2) Replace Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis image by adding Satyajit Ray or Ravi Shankar (which ever is possible) at row 4 3) Replace Sania Mirza image by adding Asha Bhosle / Lata Mangeshkar at row 5

Please replace as early as early as possible. Thanks--Kkm010 (talk) 12:18, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Exact same Paulina Vega photo returns

Hi. I just nominated Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paulina Vega Dieppa.jpg that, among other things, is exactly the same low resolution file as you recently deleted as File:Paulina-vega-interna.jpg, then realized I could probably just tell you about it to speedy the process. --GRuban (talk) 14:30, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Sri Divya image

Hi, do you think File:Sri_Divya.jpeg is own work as claimed? I don't understand the metadata but it isn't EXIF. - Sitush (talk) 19:32, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

could you please kindly explain ??

Dear mr , Dharmadhyaksha (talk) ,
you said "possible copyright violation" about my upload.

my statement : i am completely denying the antecedent .
1 st : according to wikimedia , i can upload content that has public domain or creative commons share alike 3.0 status/license . [1] [2]

2 ND: according to creativecommons.org & archive.org , THIS content HAS "Public Domain Dedication" ,& No Copyright .

3RD: IN 2 February 2012 Wikimedia Commons administrator , FunkMonk UPLOADED THIS FILE ,FROM THE SAME archive.org SOURCE
NOW, could you please kindly explain ??

your sincerely masum (talk)

Looks like this concerns me also, because I tagged the file as copyright violation. Anyway, answering to your question, BBC is the copyright holder of the said video. Archive.org is an online archive. Anyone can upload any file there and that does not mean that the uploader is the copyright holder, who has released the file into public domain. Unless BBC releases the file under public domain, it is always necessary to get a permission from them to upload in Commons and without that permission, it is definitely a copyright violationa and Dharmadhyaksha deleted the file for that reason. Besides, the file which FunkMonk uploaded is definitely in PD, because it was uploaded by National Archives and falls under {{PD-USGov}}, so he has done the right thing. I agree with FunkMonk that whether the second file is in PD or not, should be checked before uploading in Commons. Thanks, -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 14:52, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Dharmadhyaksha,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Cinespot

Template:Cc-by-3.0-Cinespot - Is this legitimate? As far as I know, the copyright holder (Cinespot) needs to confirm this via email. - Managerarc talk 20:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks @Managerarc: for the note. It's up for deletion now at Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Cc-by-3.0-Cinespot. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
I undid all that contributions. If you think it is not legitimate please delete the template and images. --Auto-Cross-Bow (talk) 05:52, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Jhony jhony ha ji

Please handle Jhony jhony ha ji (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) . I noted the problems at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections#User:Jhony jhony ha ji. Getting to be too troublesome with copyvios on existing high use files. —SpacemanSpiff 12:55, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Please restore book poster of the Geometric Modeling by Dr. Golovanov

Dear Dharmadhyaksha,

You have removed the image File:The Geometric Modeling Book.png citing a copyright violation.

I uploaded this picture and stated that it's free to use since all the Geometric Book rights is property of the C3D Labs company, which I represent. So, C3D Labs has no claims on the picture and Dr. Nikolay Golovanov as the author of the book has no objections or claim for use.

I have used this pic on different other internet pages but that doesn't make its property.

Please restore this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArkadiyKamnev (talk • contribs) 08:50, 02 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Pacific Swift 12.JPG

File:Pacific Swift 12.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Courtesy notification...

...since you did the license review: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nayantara at South Indian International Movie Awards 2013.jpg. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 14:09, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Request for a license review

Can you review the copyright license of this pic? Is it suitable for its upload here? - NitinMlk (talk) 23:57, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

@NitinMlk: The above BH images seems fine. Go ahead and upload it. Someone, if not me, will review it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:39, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
@Dharmadhyaksha: Uploaded the file - File:Saina Nehwal in 2011.jpg. It was my first upload on any wiki. And I messed it up a bit. So, please do check it whenever you get some time, as it might need some cleanup. - NitinMlk (talk) 18:58, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. - NitinMlk (talk) 08:56, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Baal Veer, Naagin, Ichhapyaari Naagin

Hi! I want to ask that why these pictures were deleted? These were uploaded by me to show the logo for the TV series. First one was "only" the official logo of Baal Veer. Second one was the logo-screenshot from Naagin (TV series)'s S2E2. And the third one was the picture, used in video preview for E1 of Ichhapyaari Naagin. I think these should not be deleted, because these might not have "Copyright Violation". Thanks! M.Billoo2000 (talk) 08:55, 13 October 2016 (UTC) M.Billoo2000 (talk) 08:55, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

The rationales are already given on your page. Please read all the blue links in them. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:59, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

So then what should be added as "logo" if everything is copyright? And if official logos are not accepted here by the users, why they are not uploaded "officially"? M.Billoo2000 (talk) 09:10, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

I think you do not understand what copyright means. Please come back when you know the gravity of the topic you want to talk about. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:12, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Please renew Mary Louise Rhodes.jpg, the copyright for the image expired in 2011. It is now 2016.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanNotacker (talk • contribs) 15:54, 03 November 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Keri the Suicide Girl in a see-through nightie.jpg

I'm a bit concerned about your decision to delete this image. The image was flickr reviewed back in 2009, and CC licences are irrevocable. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:35, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

@Mattbuck: Sorry for delayed response. I was gonna look into it, check the source and it's authenticity but never got into doing it. Sorry that you had to go to UNDEL for it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:32, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

SIIMA images

This sucks, but many uploaders of SIIMA images from Bollywood Hungama did not seem to realise that photographs of non-Indian events at the website are not free. As a result, I think there is going to have to be a genocide of such images here. It's hard for me to nominate each SIIMA image individually for deletion, given there is no SIIMA category here, but as an admin, could you please do something? Kailash29792 (talk) 07:29, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing it out. I have started a FFD at Commons:Deletion requests/SIIMA images from bollywoodhungama. You may add more images as and when you find in this FFD itself. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:19, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Why was File:SIG-Logo.jpg deleted? According to the Wikipedia Logos page a low-res image of a company logo should fall under fair use. How am I to upload company logos?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by WorldPizzaDay (talk • contribs) 13:32, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Jilukv2--suspicious uploads

Hey. Take a look at Special:Contributions/Jilukv2. Three image uploads are of well-known people and are just too good to be true IMHO. Usual redflags are present: too less information (no EXIF etc) and less resolution (more likely not the original owner). For Pramod Mahajan's pic, I did a quick search by image. Quite a few links already using it before its upload in Jan--like this. What is to be done? Ugog Nizdast (talk) 08:02, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Another: Special:Contributions/Sumant1993, Nagpal image, do a search test and news reports use it. Other image has a watermark of some website. Two random instances, both I found suspicious works...is this so prevalent here? Ugog Nizdast (talk) 09:11, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Ugog Nizdast, you are right. Leaving behind the two school pics of the user Jilukv2, all the pics are taken from the net. So, I filed their deletion request. - NitinMlk (talk) 19:39, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks NitinMlk for doing my dirty work. In retrospect, pretty obvious cases and I should have done it myself. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 07:46, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Hey, couldn't we just Commons:CSD it per criteria 1? Ugog Nizdast (talk) 07:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
As rightly suggested by you, I should've filed the deletion request through the appropriate channel. Then again, I haven't gone through Commons' policies yet, as the regular deletion request always gets these types of files deleted for me. Having said that, Dharmadhyaksha or any other admin can still speed-up their deletion if they feel that these are clear cases of copyvios. In fact, that's what happened in my first DR – Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burhan Wani.png. - NitinMlk (talk) 18:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Sock uploads

I just blocked Cinemasouthindia on en as a sock of Georgemohan88. You had deleted the latter's uploads earlier. This account was created shortly after the en wiki blocks of the master but it's too stale to run a check there. The same nonsense copyvios have propped up on the new one now. Do what you can :) —SpacemanSpiff 10:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Master was blocked here in June by INeverCry who is apparently not available for admin actions now. —SpacemanSpiff 10:46, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Yep, no more admin actions, but I can still wish you both Happy Holidays and good health. Hey, I'll even wish this goofy sockmaster Happy Holidays, along with Jhony jhony ha ji, wherever he is...sitting in his parent's basement... lNeverCry 21:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Owaisi / MIM socks

I just blocked a couple of them on en, after he used a copyvio that he uploaded here, with a charming edit summary. You may want to delete the uploads here, I've tagged this one, the others are likely suspect too. —SpacemanSpiff 11:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:46, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Dharmadhyaksha!

Happy New Year!

Dharmadhyaksha, a new year is like a blank book, the pen is in your hands. It is your chance to write a beautiful story for yourself! Happy New Year 2017. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:13, 31 December 2016 (UTC)


Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dharmadhyaksha/Archive_4&oldid=229886150"