User talk:Foxy5

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Foxy5!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 06:08, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Foxy5,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:BayernAtlas Urkataster Schweinfurt.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:BayernAtlas Urkataster Schweinfurt.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:05, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lizenzstatus wurde auf Commons:Forum#mangelhafte Lizenzangabe geklärt und entsprechend in die Datei eingetragen. Datei kann aus Löschungs-Liste herausgenommen werden. --Foxy5 (talk) 14:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 03:36, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Löschung von mir akzeptiert.--Foxy5 (talk) 09:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC) ✓ Done[reply]
File:SW mit Hainberg.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 11:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mainleite bei Schweinfurt.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 11:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deine Frage

[edit]

Hallo Foxy5,

ich verschiebe deine Frage mal von Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mainleite bei Schweinfurt.png hierher:


Eine ganz allgemeine Frage - nicht zu diesem Bild: Bei den meisten historischen Fotos, die in Medien veröffentlicht werden, sind weder Urheber noch Datum des Bildes, noch Datum der Erstveröffentlichung angegeben. In den selben Medien werden aber manchmal zu historischen Fotos Urheber und Datum angegeben. Woraus man schließen kann, dass bei Weglassung dem Veröffentlicher diese Dinge unbekannt sind. Frage: Was ist zu tun, wenn man ein historisches Foto ohne all diese Angaben (Urheber, Datum Foto, Datum Erstveröffentlichung, gab es überhaupt zuvor eine Veröffentlichung) auffindet? Das sind vielleicht 95 % aller analogen Fotos - allein schon deshalb, weil die meisten (Hobby)Fotografen nie lernten, auf die Rückseite des Abzugs das Datum zu schreiben. Foxy5 (talk) 19:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Anschauen und sich drüber freuen? Oder worum geht es konkret? --Rosenzweig τ 22:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ums Urheberrecht, wenn man es veröffentlichen will, z.B. auf Commons Foxy5 (talk) 09:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dass „bei Weglassung dem Veröffentlicher diese Dinge unbekannt sind“ würde ich nicht so sehen, gerade im Internet ist das vielen völlig egal, da wird hemmungslos alles mögliche kopiert, ohne Quellenangaben, ohne Angaben zu Umständen, Urheber, weiteren Details usw.

Wenn du wirklich gar nichts weißt, lädst du ein solches Bild nicht hoch, denn du kannst dann ja nicht wissen, ob das Bild urheberrechtlich geschützt ist und die grundlegende Commons-Richtlinie, Commons:Lizenzen, erfüllt wird. Meist wirst du aber zumindest ein ungefähres Entstehungsjahr wissen. Wenn das mindestens 120 Jahre her ist, kannst du es mit der Lizenzvorlage {{PD-old-assumed-expired}} hochladen. Es sei denn natürlich, ein Urheber ist bekannt und vor weniger als 70 Jahren gestorben, dann passt diese Vorlage nicht. Ansonsten musst du eben versuchen, mehr herauszufinden. Manchmal kann man andere Versionen eines im Internet veröffentlichten Bildes mit einer Rückwartssuche (Tineye oder Google Lens) finden. Da sind dann manchmal auch bspw. Rückseiten von Postkarten dabei, die evtl. den Urheber angeben oder eine Datierung ermöglichen, bspw. durch Poststempel. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 06:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]