User talk:FritsHG/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

QIC

See Commons:Quality_images_candidates#Evaluating_images: "Any registered user, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination." Jee 15:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC) ---

 Sorry! FritsHG Question? 09:02, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

You are right

this is not my work, I'm new to wikimedia and I'm learning how to upload images since I plan to upload more (accurate posts) in the future. I did not create or own this but then again I don't know how else to upload pictures but to click on that option. I apologise for any inconvinience and rest assured I will learn more and post accurate references along with the pictures in the future.

P.S. Sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakefive82 (talk • contribs) ---

 Oh, it happened to me in the beginning. Do not Care! I hope you've learned something from it!   

FritsHG Question? 09:02, 20 December 2014 (UTC) ---

Sorry, I'll change the license. Кардам (talk) 20:00, 19 December 2014 (UTC) ---

 Oh, it happened to me in the beginning. Do not Care! I hope you've learned something from it! 

FritsHG Question? 09:02, 20 December 2014 (UTC) ---

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
مرحبا ياصديقي كيف حالك MOUAD MANSOURI (talk) 12:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Grand petit déjeuner

Grand petit déjeuner Dans une dizaine de villes de la croatie le dimanche matin 19 octobre 2003a étéorganisè le plus grand petit déjeuner du mond. ((Selon l'agenée reuters au moins 38,665 personnes ont participé à l'évènement)). Des cérèales.

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
لاشكر على واجب ياصديقي كيف حالك هل انت بخير MOUAD MANSOURI (talk) 16:26, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Forward again poster obama.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jee 07:28, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

MazowieckiPielgrzym

Dear FritsHG,

thank you for your contribution. This situation definitely needs to be explained to you.

Recently we uploaded a quite large number of pictures of churches in our region using the account MazowieckiPielgrzym. The entity initially responsible for these pictures (before sharing them on public license) is a Polish "Local Tourism Organization" (full name: Lokalna Organizacja Turystyczna Skarbiec Mazowiecki) website: http://lotsm.pl (own service http://skarbiecmazowiecki.pl/) Exactly these pictures (whole set) have been prepared to be shared on this license in Wikipedia-related services obtaining all the permissions from photographers (even the permission not to be named personally under each picture). LOT SM has purposefully created the account MazowieckiPielgrzym to share EXACTLY THESE pictures in these resolutions and versions.

We are aware of licensing issues.

Will you need any other explanation to lift the ban on these pictures?

MazowieckiPielgrzym (talk) 09:31, 22 December 2014 (UTC)


MazowieckiPielgrzym: If so, the organization must send an email to OTRS! FritsHG Question? 15:47, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

An appropiate e-mail to will be send tomorrow morning from the main e-mail account of the LOT SM organization to permissions-commons-pl@wikimedia.org . Technically today I've put all the media that we plan and are able to release on public license in one folder on my private (I am an accredited contributor to the LOT SM Organisation) google account under an accessible URL https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B80cAnA5g1Y7MHVMaHU2NlNqOVk&usp=sharing . Will this be all right for the OTRS-team? MazowieckiPielgrzym (talk) 20:42, 22 December 2014 (UTC)


I think so. FritsHG Question? 06:42, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Please don't remove other users comments and {{Vd}} from deletion requests. This is your final warning. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:47, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Steinsplitter: Sorry, but he has not waited seven days before it that the file had to be removed! FritsHG Question? 16:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests

It is backwards. This map is more updated than the last. The former is March 2013 and this is October 2014. Jozual (talk) 18:01, 23 December 2014 (UTC) It is not the same file. Eg. Russia is now in gmt +3 and there are more countries changed. Thanks a lot. Jozual (talk) 18:13, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I have not seen! FritsHG Question? 07:09, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked

Natuur12 (talk) 13:05, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Email

Beste FritsHG, ik heb je email ontvangen. Ben niet zo actief op Commons de laatste tijd en qua tijd komt het mij ook niet zo af. Ik denk dat je dus even verder moet kijken. Ik zou je aan willen raden om te focussen op het nemen van (goede) foto's en die hier te plaatsen en dan wellicht rustig aan te verbreden. Je wilt nu te snel gaan en dan raak je in de problemen. Multichill (talk) 22:27, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Screenshot your prezis.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

JurgenNL (talk) 16:48, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Wijzigingen teruggedraaid

Ik heb je wijzigingen hier teruggedraaid omdat dit geen waarschuwingen waren maar berichtgevingen over verwijdernominaties. Gebruikers zijn vrij om deze te archiveren. JurgenNL (talk) 17:16, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Jurgen: Hij archiveerde het niet door een archief te maken maar verwijderde ze alleen maar van zijn overlegpagina! FritsHG Question? 17:53, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Er staat nergens dat het verplicht is om een archief aan te maken. Overleg is altijd nog terug te vinden in de geschiedenis van de overlegpagina. JurgenNL (talk) 18:31, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Okay. FritsHG Question? 18:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Google logos

Please note they these are not above TOO, any out-of-context use is already covered by the Trademark warning template (which should be placed if not present). --Denniss (talk) 14:02, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done I think not, but okay. FritsHG Question? 14:13, 8 January 2015 (UTC)