User talk:Höyhens

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Höyhens!

Filnik 18:20, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:20, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. ty. --Höyhens (talk) 20:15, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:21, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

To be deleted. --Höyhens (talk) 20:15, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear,

I confirm that it is a picture of the "true" Lathyrus tuberosus. You are apparently mixing it with Lathyrus linifolius, another species also with tubers, which was earlier called Orobus tuberosus.

Best regards, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 08:46, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TY so much. As I already told by the picture, I have messed it up with Lathyrus japonicus. But what does the old picture really show, keeps unclear to me. --Höyhens (talk) 22:39, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Tricholoma ulvinenii fi.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

128.214.62.205 09:24, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Ciclus cinclus Temmesjoki Tyrnävä October4.2022.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ciclus cinclus Temmesjoki Tyrnävä October4.2022.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:05, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You. I have all necessary licences, but it was hard to put them to right places, as the protocol has been changend since the prevous time, and I will change this all at a week or try it later if I have no time before. --Höyhens (talk) 21:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voisiko Kainun uudesta keskussairaalasta saada valokuvia?

[edit]

Sain vihjeen, että asut Kajaanissa toiselta käyttäjältä. Wikipedian puolella on artkkeli "Kainuun keskussairaala" ja sielä on ulkokuvia vain vanhasta jo pureutusta sairaalasta. Voisiko saada kuvia tuosta uudesta Kainuun keskussairaalasta tänne? Näin saadaan ajantasaiset kuvat tuohon artikkeliin. Kiitos ja kumarrus! MailariX (talk) 14:50, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hyvä idea. Koetan muistaa ottaa joskus kameran mukaan kunhan käyn sillä suunnalla. --Höyhens (talk) 15:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nyt siellä on yksi ulkokuva, muutakin kuin kappeli. --Höyhens (talk) 14:12, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Kiitos!Lisäsin tuon kuvasi ko. artikkelin pääkuvaksi. Alempaa löytyy kuva jo puretusta sairalasta. Toki tuohon artikkeliin voi lisätä myös muita kuvia uudesta sairaalasta jos joku käy niitä ottamassa. MailariX (talk) 16:16, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sopii hyvin. Kuva on ehkä turhan kaukaa otettu, mutta eipä näy mitään sellaista minkä ei soisi näkyvän. --Höyhens (talk) 16:20, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]