User talk:Iharishs

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Iharishs!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:46, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Streets of Bhadrachalam 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khammam Fort aka Khammam Khilla 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Oppose Agressively downsampled, too small resolution. --Kallerna 11:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Kallerna: , higher resolution images updated, please check. --IM3847 16:57, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Kallerna 09:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! People in streets of Bhadrachalam 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Moroder 17:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bhadrachalam Ghat 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Any chanse to get the top of the bag? --C messier 20:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@C messier: I tried it, but seems impossible to properly generate it via AI --IM3847 05:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Current crop isn't the best but good enough for QI. --C messier 20:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Procession at Bhadrachalam 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK. --C messier 19:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pattabhishekam at Bhadrachalam 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! People in streets of Bhadrachalam 03 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Distracting elements in the foreground, I suggest a tighter crop on person. --C messier 20:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@C messier: Done, please review. --IM3847 05:38, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Foreground, not background. The out of focus cell phone and shelf, in particular. --C messier 21:22, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@C messier: cropped to the subject. --IM3847 12:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Moroder 11:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]