User talk:Kaffe42

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Kaffe42!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:53, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

File:The Amazing Race 23 logo.jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content. We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules. In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions. Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.

 

JuTa 00:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Kommunekort

Jeg tror det nu om dage generelt foretrækkes at kort som f.eks. dem du har lavet over gamle kommuner, laves som en:SVG. Se f.eks. File:Kerteminde municipality numbered.svg --Hjart (talk) 19:38, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

@Hjart: Hej, tak for informationen. Det var jeg ikke klar over. Jeg er ikke sikker på at mit redigeringsprogram kan lave svg-filer, men jeg kan sikkert finde en converter et eller andet sted. Men umiddelbart vil jeg fortsætte med at smide png'er op af de gamle kommuner, så kan jeg rette det engang senere. Jeg tvivler på at de filer kommer til at blive brugt særlig meget alligevel. Men ja, tak for informationen. Og fedt at se andre aktive danskere herinde! Kaffe42 (talk) 20:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Jeg kopierer lige dit svar herover, så det er lidt nemmere at holde styr på tråden. Med hensyn til SVG, se også Commons:Transition to SVG og Commons:Graphic Lab, hvor det ser ud til at man kan bede om hjælp til diverse udfordringer med grafik. Jeg har fundet en interesse i at sortere/organisere billedmateriale med relation til DK, så jeg bruger en del tid på Commons, Wikidata og (primært) dansk Wikipedia. --Hjart (talk) 05:45, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Fedt, tak. Jeg tror jeg smider Template:Convert to SVG ind på alle mine kort, så kan det være der er en der kan hjælpe på et tidspunkt. Jeg er selv primært på den engelske Wikipedia, hvor jeg arbejder på siderne for de danske kommuner og relaterede sider (byer, gamle kommuner). -- Kaffe42 (talk) 07:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Bemærk at de fleste af de sognekort du har lavet, i forvejen eksisterede i SVG-versioner. Se Category:Parishes in Denmark. --Hjart (talk) 16:35, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

For VI

Hi, For churches or castles that have different aspects depending on the faces, it is good to give the meaning of the view in the scope: such as East exosure or south exposure to be able to promote also the other possible views. Regards --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:03, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nordby Bell Tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Please add geocode and view direction. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:25, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Done. -- Kaffe42 (talk) 08:33, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:35, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too bright and has a lot of empty space on the right. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 01:14, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope I don't find it too bright; it's not over-exposed. I like the inclusion of context, with the cottage at the right and the old lady crossing the road. Adds colour. Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eta 955.114, dial side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and obviously useful image -- Spurzem (talk) 14:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:52, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
ETA 955.114, back.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and obviously useful image -- Spurzem (talk) 14:04, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Changed "backside"(=buttocks) to "back" in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:53, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Langør Church, southeast orientation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Perspective correction necessary and it would be good to put the view orientation --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
• Perfect for the scope, but you have to straighten the church. Call if you have any problems. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
• Corrected the perspective slightly. Kaffe42 (talk) 13:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
• Once more corrected. -- Spurzem (talk) 16:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Langør Church, southeast orientation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Perspective correction necessary and it would be good to put the view orientation --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
• Perfect for the scope, but you have to straighten the church. Call if you have any problems. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
• Corrected the perspective slightly. Kaffe42 (talk) 13:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
• Once more corrected. -- Spurzem (talk) 16:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Contents of a quartz watch, ETA-ESA 955.412.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• The scope is too wide: add ETA-ESA 955.412 --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• Done -- Kaffe42 (talk) 08:26, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nyborg Cemetery Chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 07:24, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
ETA-ESA 955.414, back.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:44, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:32, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Battery leak damage, ETA 955.112.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:56, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:08, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Qasigiannguit Kommune Coat of Arms.png

File:Qasigiannguit Kommune Coat of Arms.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Palnatoke (talk) 11:48, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)