User talk:Mosbatho/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Reversion of my edits to File:Arbeiders aan een werkbank in een fabriek, RP-F-F03787.jpg[edit]

Hi Mosbatho, Why have you reverted my edits (with dynamic ip 86.162.30.245) to File:Arbeiders aan een werkbank in een fabriek, RP-F-F03787.jpg when I cited two web sources for the category change? http://www.museumofwhitbyjet.com/ and https://www.thewhitbyguide.co.uk/whitby-jet/ Unless you have a good reason I intend to restore my changes. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A00:23C6:3B82:8500:3875:6D39:8B21:D862 (talk) 19:47, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sorry, but you have destroyed the template structure. As such it resembled like vandalism. I reinstalled your categories. --Mosbatho (talk) 21:11, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A00:23C6:3B82:8500:A8F3:D481:B63D:C43D (talk) 23:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback given[edit]

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Commons:Rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Jianhui67 T★C 10:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jianhui67, thank you very much! Kindest regards, Mosbatho (talk) 12:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No problem! By the way, I realised you revealed your IP by accident. Do you want me to revdel that edit? Jianhui67 T★C 12:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An accident occured obviously. Yes, can you please do so? --Mosbatho (talk) 12:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done! Jianhui67 T★C 12:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of Platon Kornyljak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coda Magazine Cover[edit]

Hello Mosbatho you sent me a warning for a possible copyright violation about this file : Coda Magazine cover.jpg I would like your help about this because I am working on a Draft on Wikipedia about a band who is on the cover of this French Magazine called "Coda Digital". I uploaded it and added it to my draft but withdrawed it immediately from my contribution wondering about possible copyright issues. This magazine stopped all his activities in 2009 and I tried to contact the journalists and the director but they are impossible to reach as the media doesn't exist anymore. What do you think? Can I upload it again as nobody will claim the copyright for it now?
Thank you very much for your help !
Naufalle Al Wahab 21:17, 1 March 2021 (CET)

Hello, good to hear from you! I believe you that this image is a valuable contribution to your article work, however, there are copyright issues. Well, the magazine cover is certainly still copyrighted, even though the magazine has not been published since 2009. So this cover can be published under a free "Creative Commons". --Mosbatho (talk) 20:33, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your quick reply this good advice. I didn't think of the free Creative Commons for this file. I will do so. thanks again for your help.

Naufalle Al Wahab 22:03, 1 March 2021 (CET)

Please keep in mind that such Creative Commons licenses do not fit automatically. I hope you can complete your article anyway. --Mosbatho (talk) 21:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colegio San Lorenzo in Cienfuegos in Cuba, 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kamov military helicopters at the Ukrainian State Aviation Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:05, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2021[edit]

Hallo Mosbatho,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2021 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum achten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

  • Sieger WLE 2020
  • Südliche Mosaikjungfer (Aeshna affinis) am Westufer des Gülper Sees
    Südliche Mosaikjungfer (Aeshna affinis) am Westufer des Gülper Sees
  • Bienenfresser im FFH-Gebiet Kaiserstuhl
    Bienenfresser im FFH-Gebiet Kaiserstuhl
  • Röhrling mit Fliege im Bruderwald in Bamberg
    Röhrling mit Fliege im Bruderwald in Bamberg
  • Strand im Nationalpark Boddenlandschaft
    Strand im Nationalpark Boddenlandschaft
  • Neuntöter im Geo-Naturpark Bergstraße-Odenwald
    Neuntöter im Geo-Naturpark Bergstraße-Odenwald

Wie du bei den Top 5 des vergangenen Jahres siehst, sind vor allem Tiere unter den Siegerbildern. Aus diesem Grund setzen wir den Fokus dieses Jahr stärker auf Landschaftsaufnahmen. Aber natürlich haben auch Tierbilder eine Chance zu gewinnen.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2021 - Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 11:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Terje Breivik (38269679894).jpg[edit]

File:Terje Breivik (38269679894).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Public bus in Abu Dhabi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 14:45, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Die Tote von Niederpöring, Museum Quintana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 15:33, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hôtel de Paris - Stad Lëtzebuerg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Palauenc05 21:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DF-41[edit]

Hello. I complete it. File:Dongfeng-41 CSS-20 sketch.svg Mike1979 Russia (talk) 11:45, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike, thank you for creating this very good image! Unfortunately you an "oppose vote" on QIC; I supported your file because it is a fine and great image. Do you plan to file it for a VI? --Mosbatho (talk) 21:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your support. I think it will be a problem with VI nomination because there are no WP:RS for this picture only Google Photos. Mike1979 Russia (talk) 16:13, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Meh. VI could be not so easy but worth a try. Nevertheless, let's see what the result of QI will bring. --Mosbatho (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kamov Ka-25 at Ukraine State Aviation Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MPT[edit]

It's y own photo also shared in MilitaryImages.net you can see my name or profile. The link you mention; please chek the profile who uploaded it :) . https://www.militaryimages.net/threads/turkish-military-forces.6788/page-43#lg=attachment232903&slide=0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cengizsogutlu (talk • contribs) 03:07, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, did you take this photo? So you were the one who took the photo of the soldier with your photo camera? --Mosbatho (talk) 15:45, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #473[edit]

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Other Noteworthy Stuff
    • Interlanguage links now work for multilingual Wikisource. phab:T275958
    • User:Nikki/LexemeEntitySuggester.js now supports searching for senses for the translation property.
    • The call for candidates for 2021 Wikimedia Foundation Board elections has begun on June 9. The last date to apply is June 29, 2021.
    • Since the beginning of the month, phabricator tickets about language codes (and names of languages) were reviewed and triaged to better reflect their content and current status. Some work was done to better identify the steps for such changes, highlight and address bottlenecks and system issues. Patches for a few codes were contributed and are being released. Phabricator "Language codes" workboard provides an overview, phab:T284856 attempts to identify maintenance steps and phab:T284276 determine turn-around times. phab:T284808 should finally close a gap in termbox language handeling. A way to better address some or all aspects of changes of language codes applicable to Wikipedia editions still needs to be found. Don't hesitate to request the addition or update of language names (e.g. the name of Dutch in Danish) or missing language codes, notably for monolingual strings (see Help:Monolingual text languages).

You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.

Russia user[edit]

Прошу прощения, не говорю на английском. Вы выставили на удаление мои загруженные файлы, однако насколько я вижу и описание и источник информации и лицензия указаны верно. Просьба ответить. Iliya Kushkin Official (talk) 13:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Уважаемый Илья Кушкин, все не так, как вы утверждаете. Это фотографии, защищенные авторским правом, НЕ по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0. Загрузка этих фотографий в Commons является нарушением авторских прав. Однако я знаю, что у вас есть глубокое желание использовать эти футбольные фотографии, что в принципе хорошо. --Mosbatho (talk) 13:44, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ну есть решение этой проблемы? Смена лицензионного соглашении или что то подобное? Iliya Kushkin Official (talk) 13:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • Сохранить эти фотографии не представляется возможным. Они будут удалены из Commons, поскольку явно нарушают авторские права. Это действительно невесело, и следует полностью воздержаться от передачи материалов, защищенных авторским правом, на Commons. Пожалуйста, прочитайте это, чтобы узнать больше об авторском праве: Commons:Лицензирование. Большое приветствие и наилучшая благодарность за ваше понимание. --Mosbatho (talk) 14:04, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Хорошо, я понимаю некоторые моменты перевода, но всё таки если не сложно объясните мне, если возможно, например, удалить фотографии, но потом загрузить с лицензии подходящей под это изображение. Iliya Kushkin Official (talk) 14:09, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • Фотографии могут удалять только администраторы. Эта группа людей будет поставлена в известность об этой проблеме и займется ее решением. --Mosbatho (talk) 14:12, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mil Mi-14 at the Ukraine State Aviation Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wendelsteinhaus, Wendelstein mountain in Upper Bavaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Too bad that Exif data are missing --Moroder 07:44, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roof top mounted Electronic sirens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vietnamese 100 mm vz. 53 towed artillery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 21:08, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dona Maria Pia Lighthouse, Praia Santiago.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Horizon tilted, otherwise good.--Peulle 00:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC) @Peulle: I have reworked this upload. --Mosbatho 19:44, 22 July 2021 (UTC)  Support --Milseburg 10:48, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The "Dead woman of Niederpöring", exhibited at the Museum Quintana.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Bravo for your first success in VI. We have a problem of image plethora and therefore loss of meaning in Wiki. Labels are one of our tools. Among the 3 labels VI is the most important which has the most encylopedic meaning. I saw your images the majority is accessible to the VI label. Join us to keep the wiki alive! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:40, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte[edit]

Bitte auf QI auf das Datum achten! Sie haben eben um 22:49 Uhr ein Bild für den morgigen Tag (8. August) nominiert., Grüße --Steindy (talk) 23:07, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bon soir! Ihre Anmerkung hat seine Richtigkeit. Es tut mir Leid, wenn mein Handeln größerer Umstände erzeugte. --Mosbatho (talk) 23:22, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North Korean Semi-submersible SP-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gureopdo island aerial view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RSD-10 - hydraulic stabilizer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:04, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021[edit]

Hallo Mosbatho,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2021 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit über zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Im Herzen Deutschlands in Thüringen und in Niedersachsen sind neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die auf Fotos warten. Übrigens in der Hauptstadt Thüringens in Erfurt findet dieses Jahr die WikiCon vom 1. bis 3. Oktober statt. Dies könnte man mit einem Foto-Kurzurlaub vor der WikiCon in Thüringen verbinden …

Vor dem Hintergrund der Flutkatastrophe 2021 haben wir auch drei Sonderpreise ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die Kulturdenkmale zeigen, die zerstört wurden. Das Foto kann das Objekt vor oder nach der Zerstörung zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 18:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AmaMagna - AMA Waterways - ENI 07002100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle in Mühlham D-2-71-141-90.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality but the building seems to be no pearl of architecture. --Hillopo2018 06:41, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tata Daewoo Novus 8x4 in South Korea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 13:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the guidance!![edit]

Thank you for the guidance!!
Thank you Mosbatho for making me aware of the copyright concern on the image I uploaded. I have requested Prakash Singh ji to send the email as per the process. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prakash_Singh.jpg

I hope it works out. Thanks again!! Ai.tarun (talk) 20:54, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome! --Mosbatho (talk) 20:41, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle Mühlham 13 D-2-71-141-89.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großenhain - Berliner Straße 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:20, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christus-König-Kirche in Lauchhammer-Mitte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:13, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großenhain - Turm der Marienkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good details. --Hillopo2018 08:00, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Mosbatho, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
rubin16 (talk) 17:07, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großenhain - Klostergasse 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please fix the white edge bottom right. --XRay 03:40, 22 September 2021 (UTC) @XRay, Oops, sorry for that lapsus. I have corrected this. --Mosbatho 06:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. Thank you. --XRay 18:04, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dorfschule Lauchhammer Alter Markt 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality and thanks! This building is a poor condition. --Hillopo2018 09:49, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VEB Fernmeldewerk Leipzig Tonband-Koffergerät KB100II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 07:50, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Christus-König church in Lauchhammer-Mitte in Brandenburg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gutshaus Geisendorf - Geisendorf (Gižkojce).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amamagna (ship, 2018).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Euoplocephalus and Gorgosaurus.jpg[edit]

File:Euoplocephalus and Gorgosaurus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Evanyu35outlookcom.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 00:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rick de Leeuw[edit]

Hello Mosbatho,

Thanks for your action on Rick de Leeuw op Parkpop Mechelen (cropped).jpg. Could you handle this request as well? Thanks, User:RonnieV

Hi, this seems already done. Best wishes, Mosbatho (talk) 22:02, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orbelian's Caravanserai, Armenia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 08:42, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:13, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keres American Angus 1431.jpg[edit]

Hi! Thanks for moving File:Keres American Angus 1431.jpg. Did you, I wonder, happen to read the reason I gave here – "This is one of eight similarly-named images in Category:American Angus; I suggest renaming all of them on the same pattern, Keres American Angus x.jpg, where x is the number between CFAP and TONED"? Do you think the other files should be moved? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:15, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thank you for your response. I have no opinion on this. If you want to get those other files to be moved, then nominate them for moving. Best regards, Mosbatho (talk) 13:17, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK, no worries. If you can't be bothered then nor can I – I've asked more than once, not going to ask again. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:05, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am always interested in supporting you in your request. It was about a file move. If you tell me which file should be moved, then let me know. That was the point, wasn't it? --Mosbatho (talk) 22:16, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move request[edit]

Why did you decline my move request? I uploaded the file, and that was the file's original name until a user decided they didn't like the name of the region shown. That user has been banned on Wikipedia from making such changes, and now I'd like the file name to go back to what it was before; the present name is misleading and wrong, as well as having faulty grammar. GPinkerton (talk) 19:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The name they selected apparently already existed, so it was already occupied (see File:Map detail showing Syrian Kurdistan in 1935.jpg). A move was not possible and it is still not possible. In the future, make sure that this error does not happen to you again. You can start a new move request. --Mosbatho (talk) 19:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure I understand, but as you point out, the file has now been moved backed to where it was originally. Thanks. GPinkerton (talk) 20:09, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent! A happy end. Regards, Mosbatho (talk) 20:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CTK armored van on the philippine island of Palawan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mosbatho/Archive_2&oldid=861874615"