User talk:NateOceanside

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, NateOceanside!

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, NateOceanside!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:11, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CategorizationBot basically produces useless crap; so I just ignore its stupid messages.

CommonSense appears to be written by retarded programmers; it's basically unsable.

Representatives diagram

[edit]

I really wish you would link directly to the images that you wish to call attention to, because it's not at all convenient to be directed to a general large Wikipedia article and try to figure out which image you mean specifically. Assuming that you mean File:PoliticalDataWikiHouse 2010-09-15.svg, part of the difficulties with that image are due to RSVG font-rendering problems, but part of the difficulties are also due to the fact that when you planned the original layout of the image, you simply didn't consider how legible the image would be when displayed at a limited pixel resolution on Wikipedia... AnonMoos (talk) 18:14, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AnonMoos was not helpful, instead he screws up my image. What a jerk.
Whatever, dude -- I cropped the image's useless and pointless margins (which serve no purpose on Wikipedia except making it even more likely that the text will be unreadable) as best I knew how... AnonMoos (talk) 14:58, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please remain calm and collegial

[edit]

català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  עברית  +/−


It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

Multichill (talk) 18:58, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]