User talk:Sreejithk2000/Archive 9

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 5 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12

At the DR you noted that you'd re-emailed the copyright holder asking for a free license. Did you hear anything back? Nyttend (talk) 18:38, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No. I forgot to follow up as well. I have sent an email again. Let us hope that the copyright holder responds this time. Thanks for the reminder. --Sreejith K (talk) 19:29, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your marking of duplicates

You marked File:Kristen Schaal by Gage Skidmore.jpg as duplicate but you should have better marked the newer, unused, file as dupe. Especially because the original file was directly uploaded by the creator and the newer from his Flickr account. Please keep an eye on this for future dupe tags as it's not the first time I stumbled onto a dupe tagged this way. Thank you. --Denniss (talk) 16:36, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I got your point. But I marked a lot of them in a semi-automated way through a script and I am not sure how to do whatever you suggested. Let me think over it more before I do the tagging again. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:58, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Why do you want to delete this file? Is the file constraining? Senior Strateg (talk) 17:40, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was nominated for deletion by User:BokicaK. I just created the missing deletion page. You may want to talk to the nominator. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:28, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's intelligible. Thanks! Senior Strateg (talk) 09:04, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or new license

You reversed my suggestion to delete File:Brev fra General Ruge 17.02.1945.jpg. Thats OK, but you wrote "No reason for deletion specifieid". That's not correct. It is suggested because the license is wrong. The text "Author died more than 70 years ago. Public domain" is wrong. Authour died in 1961.
Maybe another license could pass, but not this. I'm sorry I don't write English any better. --Knut (talk) 19:57, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You only added {{Delete}} to the page. The template should also include a reason. I got your reason now and so I have nominated it for deletion. Please see my edit to see how a file is nominated for deletion. If you have any doubts, please ask. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:30, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I noticed how you wrote it. I have no personal interest in this letter, but right should be right. --Knut (talk) 06:27, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sreejithk2000. You have new messages at Lovysinghal's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

-- Lovy Singhal (talk) 05:45, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Adrian Bradshaw.jpg

Hello Sreejithk2000

I found that one of my recent uploads has vanished from commons,later with much haze I got to know that you have deleted http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Adrian_Bradshaw.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 Photograph from commons,Though this Flickr account is blacklisted for some reason,this particular account is an official Flickr account of a well recognized website -> http://www.isaf.nato.int/ ,and cannot find any other version of this Pic out of Flickr,Consider about the pic Size,Exif data as well,Is there a law here to delete all pics come from blacklisted Flickr accounts,I don't think so - This is NOT fair at all.
Thanks :) MediaJet (talk) 06:37, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize that I did not pay much attention. I have restored the image and raised a deletion request instead. Lets see what others have to say. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:17, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) MediaJet (talk) 16:58, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ginger farm.jpg

Hi Sreejithk2000,

Could you tell me whether the following statement corresponds to your expectations for a publication in my next book in French-speaking countries, or if it lacks an element declaration :

« Photo by Anee jose, Ginger farm.jpg. Source http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ginger_farm.jpg. Reproduced under license cc-by-3.0 Unported - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en ».

I thank you in advance, Arevalb — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arevalb (talk • contribs) 05:11, 1 February 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

As long as the image is not used for commercial purposes, the attribution looks perfect. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Sreejithk2000,

Thanks for your prompt reply. So, do you mean that you would prefer that I choose another author than you, for this theme in my next book that has obviously some commercial purpose ? Thanking you in advance for your reply. Arevalb. Arevalb (talk) 09:19, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The license under which the image is published in Wikimedia Commons does not allow a commercial use. If you want to use the image in a commercial way, please talk to the photographer Anee jose. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:20, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Striking off the wrong statement. Creative Commons license allows commercial use. You are free to use the image in your next book but please provide adequate attribution like what you gave before. The photographer Anee jose has messaged me in my home wiki that he is glad that his image is being used in a helpful manner. --Sreejith K (talk) 05:16, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As Sreejith said, Im glad that you use the image for your magazine. good luck --AneeshJose 07:27, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Corrected the image source

File:Kapoor PCA12.jpg pass it Perumalism Chat 09:09, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Its not the same file. Look at the angle the actress is looking. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:48, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

yes correct my mistake Perumalism Chat 09:13, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File N P Rajendran

The file N P Rajendran Speech seems to be a photo taken by you. Can you include the same in en wikipedia so that it could be used in N. P. Rajendran. Not sure about the licence Athulbnair (talk) 17:15, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did not take this image, but I have included it in the en wiki page. Thanks for notifying. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:30, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Thanks. I hope received my reply. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:48, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My rights

Hello! As you know, I am an OTRS member since long. But my rights over here at Commons don't reflect that. When inquired at the OTRS Cafe i was told that probably the respective Project's sysops could fix that. Hence here. Could you please fix it? Proof of me being an OTRS member. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:47, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please add a request at Commons:Bureaucrats' noticeboard. Only Crats can give you that flag. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:47, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh i see! Didn't know that. That page has only OTRS flag requests on it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:44, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for fixing that ! I try to make sure things are easy to find, but I always make a mess at other times.

Using commons images only doesn't seem to mean that images won't get deleted, they always find something ! but I like it, it's an excuse to make more images, which I like to do. Penyulap 23:53, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome. I split the file history for File:Whambo.jpg, but I do not know what to vote in the Deletion request. I hope you do not mind. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed

Hi! Could you have a look at this image and maybe add some categories? I can't figure out anything :) Thanks a bunch! --Hedwig in Washington (Woof?) 03:55, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's a lamp pole? That cracks me up! I thought is some kind of a bird's nest or something like that. :-)) Thanks for having a look! --Hedwig in Washington (Woof?) 06:18, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Dipa sthambham translates to Lamp pole in almost all Indian languages. This one is not a conventional one. I can see wiring on it. Btw, there was a duplicate available and so I have redirected this file there. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:18, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Google translate couldn't translate this word. And my Hindi is rusty :-))) Thanks for your time! --Hedwig in Washington (Woof?) 18:40, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Events / Movie stills

Hello! I wanted to upload these two images from Bollywood Hungama 1 and 2 of the actress Negar Khan. The images are of audio launch event of the 2004 film Shaadi Ka Laddoo. But the images are placed under "Movie stills" category by BH. Will the images be deleted if uploaded? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:40, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The template {{Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama}} says that all the photographs from their website with the exception of screenshots, wallpapers or promotional posters are all owned by them and are free. Going by this, these pictures are good to be uploaded here. --Sreejith K (talk) 07:27, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thats what i wanted to clarify, if the actual type of photograph matters or the way they label it matters. Because other, and majority, of moviestills are actually screenshots and are thus not allowed. I will upload them now. Thanks! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:10, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information planks

Hello! There are many images of planks over here. Example: File:Bidar Fort description.JPG. Is this okay? 2D works are not covered in FOP#India. And this is text. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:17, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated this one for deletion. --Sreejith K (talk) 05:26, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that. I will raise a mass nomination sometime. I remember seeing many of these, but don't wanna search them now. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:03, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Policy

What is the policy on photos like this? --Vssun (talk) 13:41, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Its discouraged to have your personal photos uploaded here, but still the picture is informative as it includes a portion of the fort as well. If you think the image is {{Out of scope}}, you can either put this template or nominate it for deletion. For this image, I think we can be a little lenient. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:43, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you --Vssun (talk) 17:57, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strange files

A user has uploaded lots of files like this. Are you able to tell what those files show and whether they are copyvios or in scope? --Stefan4 (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My knowledge in Tamil language is not that good enough to give a quick judgement. But I have sent a note to a few Wikipedian's in that language. I am waiting for their answer. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:04, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I see. It said "ta-1" on your user page, so I hoped that you would at least be able to decipher something. Let's hope someone else can tell, then. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:49, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have basic knowledge in that language, but not enough to ascertain the scope. It is most likely out of scope if not copyvio, but lets wait for confirmation. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:04, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sreejith, All the Tamil titled images list the names of Gods / Goddess present in Shiva temples. The image titles include words like Page 1, Page 2 etc., So, it is likely that it is a scanned image of a book or something. The information in these images can be transcribed and is also availble as public knowledge. I don't see a need for them to be saved as image files. This is my personal opinion. Please decide according to Commons rules and after giving a chance for the uploader to explain.

— Ravi, in: via email

--Sreejith K (talk) 14:55, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being able to find someone who could determine what it was! I had no clue when I saw the images myself. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:52, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bollywood Hungama's suspicious images

Hello! I came across these two images File:Christian Bale 2011.jpg and File:Natalie Portman 2, 2011.jpg uploaded under the BH's license. The sources match for both files and the images are in the "parties and events" section too. But i am suspicious of BH being the actual author of these images. Its a website dedicated to Bollywood in general and other Indian film related activities. I don't say that they can't fly to LA and click these pics or they can't upload it from any other source that has given these pics under the same license. But i am still skeptical about it. Can we trust a website in such cases? (Note: I haven't yet checked for possible copyvios from other sites. The images are cropped and hence searching is not that easy.) §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:24, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about this situation. They could be copyvios, but how to tell? I took the original images from the website and the images are missing EXIF, so I am not sure. If you think this needs to be investigated, please raise a DR. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:08, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done here... Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unreviewed files from Bollywood Hungama. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:52, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On what basis did you approve this image? I see no indication on the source page that it is licensed under Creative Commons. Senator2029 23:21, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why certain files from bollywoodhungama.com are in CC is explained in Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama --Sreejith K (talk) 15:15, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC

Hi, I created a TUSC account a while back (for using cropbot). I don't think that I changed my password. No when I try to log in, I'm not able to enter into the interface. Can you throw some light on this as User:Luxo seems to be currently inactive. Vensatry (Ping me) 15:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you post the question at User talk:Magnus Manske? --Sreejith K (talk) 16:48, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

help regarding article

Sir, i'm new to wikipedia, i have created an article yesterday, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitesh_Narayan_Rane

a message is showing "This article is a reviewed orphan, as no other articles link to it"

i have posted two photos in that article which i found on facebook and they are not copyrighted. i have mentioned the source but there's a message saying "This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. Unless the copyright status is provided, the file will be deleted seven days after this template was added" can you please help me in this issue?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aniketp007 (talk • contribs) 05:19, 4 April 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Looking after it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:17, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright statuses could be confusing for newbies. So I recommend that you upload only the pictures that you have taken yourself. Other pictures are probably owned by the respective photographers and you do not have the copyright for it. Facebook photos, a definite NO. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:39, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! These two images uploaded by Aniket; File:Nitesh rane.jpg and File:NiteshNrane.jpg are back as File:Job fair 2011.jpg and File:Ranenitesh.jpg. I am not sure, but they are either same or at least very similar. Can you check if they are same? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:29, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Job fair 2011.jpg is a cropped version of File:NiteshNrane.jpg. File:Ranenitesh.jpg is quite similar to File:Nitesh rane.jpg taken at the same location by most probably the same person, but they are not the same. --Sreejith K (talk) 03:49, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have tagged 1st one as copyvio now. 2nd i will leave as missing permission. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:02, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Malayalam for Template:Closed captions

Hi, Sreejithk! The template Template:Closed captions does not yet have a Malayalam translation. Are you interested in adding one? Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 18:31, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A bit confused here. I created TimedText:Closed_captions.ml.srt now, is that what you meant? --Sreejith K (talk) 03:16, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Parkway Bakery photo - a note on why I reversed your deletion

Good day. I undid and reversed your deletion of File:Parkway Bakery New Orleans.jpg in favor of File:Parkway Bakery (4704158421).jpg. The image you deleted had vague categorization whereas the one you deleted was in a specific cat for that restaurant; it also had inaccurate description of the location. I might have simply replaced the poor categorization and misinformation on the image you kept with that from the one you deleted, but the one you kept also had a much worse name. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 23:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. Thanks for having a look. --Sreejith K (talk) 12:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Malayalam for Template:Closed captions

Hi, Sreejithk! The template Template:Closed captions does not yet have a Malayalam translation. Are you interested in adding one? Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 18:31, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A bit confused here. I created TimedText:Closed_captions.ml.srt now, is that what you meant? --Sreejith K (talk) 03:16, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry for not making it clear. I meant the following:
  1. download this video file (right click → save target as)
  2. download a subtitle file (.srt file format) from below (right click → save target as) to the same folder and name it Sreejithk2000/Archive 9.srt
  3. view the video with VLC media player (subtitles will be usually be automatically shown)
Thanks,
WhisperToMe (talk) 19:47, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please.

You do not seem to own the photographs of Nandini Sahu. You will have to contact the copyright owner and ask them to email the permission as an OTRS email if you want Commons to host that image. --Sreejith K (talk) 03:19, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It was already done by the copyright owner Nandini Sahu twice to commons by email through me, I did not say that I was the owner. Can you further help that I am the owner, author, legal authority, subject of the article, editor and uploader of these images, what is going on there, cannot understand. I hope you will advise and help in this regard in a neutral way and as the exact description of the policy.Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 20:09, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr doubt

Previously one used to see the license information on the right side on any flickr image. I can't see that anymore. Has flickr modified something or have i done something wrong? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:26, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If I am at the photostream page, I can see the license under the image thumbnail, but if I am at a photo page, the only place I am able to see the license is under the Share menu. If you expand the item "Grab the HTML/BBCode", you can see the license at the very bottom. I cannot believe flickr has hid the license at a location which is so difficult to find. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:50, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
WoW! That was quite complicated. But i guess they fixed it. Its now back on the right side bar. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:39, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's great. Thanks for letting me know. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:58, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lee Hi.jpg

Hello, File:Lee Hi.jpg is not a copyvio, because the image is not mere an advertisement what you said, but is from LG's official Flickr account licensed under cc-by license. also, please see a similar case: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Super_junior111.jpg --Puramyun31 (talk) 08:11, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Restored the file and raised a deletion request to understand the community opinion on this. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:17, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sreejithk2000, Why you delete this Talk page, i added this Template to all Talk Pages? Greetings--Steinsplitter (talk) 22:18, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But the file no longer exists. We should not have talk pages for non-existing files. --Sreejith K (talk) 03:31, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oooops, Sorry! I thought the image still exists. Greetings :-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 05:56, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Thanks. --Sreejith K (talk) 06:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you have a look at the uploads of Nirjhar_goswami (talk · contribs), they are all uncategorised and very badly named/described. I reckon they are all made in/related to West-Bengal, and I've a feeling someone with more cultural knowledge of the area can make sense of the images better than me. Thanks in advance, -- Deadstar (msg) 09:12, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not familiar with that part of the country either. I have added some categories to almost all images, but they are not accurate. I will try go get some help. --Sreejith K (talk) 22:09, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! -- Deadstar (msg) 11:27, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rename wrong name?

Why did you direct this "File:Flag of Guanajuato.svg" to "File:Guanajuato Flag.svg"?, it's not a exactly duplicate file (they have different designs) besides the name "Guanajuato Flag.svg" is completly wrong, it should be rename as "Flag of Guanajuato". Thank you. --Giggette (talk) 19:03, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Now the file is available as File:Flag of Guanajuato.svg --Sreejith K (talk) 20:17, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much.--Giggette (talk) 05:57, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

duplicates of djvu files

When identifying duplicates of djvu, it is well worth noting that where the work is transcluded at Wikisource, then the work should not be nominated as the duplicate. If a work needs to be nominated, it should be the work that is not utilised, irrespective of dates, and all other features and history.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:05, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. I will take care of this from next time. Thanks for the note. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:38, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunil sukhada from amen.jpg

File:Sunil sukhada from amen.jpg--Rojypala (talk) 14:39, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

link--Rojypala (talk) 14:43, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominated it as copyright violation. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading Photos queries

Hello there, do mind if you can explain to me the complete procedures of uploading a photo. Which ever article I read about uploading photos, has got my completely confused even more. And also if you could tell me on how add photos to a page whilst linking it to the main website,example if i am not wrong you were the one who uploaded the photo for Neha Sharma's page. Apparently the photo is linked from bollywood hungama. So does that mean that , i can tag anything any photo from that website and just give them the due credits or obtain permission from them individually. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PraveenDxT (talk • contribs) 13:55, 2 June 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

Bollywood Hungama website has been generous enough to donate all the photos taken by their staff photographers in a free license. We have borrowed a lot of their work. Feel free to take pictures from their website which is listed in the Parties and Events section. Do not pick screenshots from movies or movie posters etc which could be copyrighted to the movie producers. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:43, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
.......tanks! I-pon (talk) 23:26, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABCD Malayalam movie Poster.jpg

File:ABCD Malayalam movie Poster.jpg --Rojypala (talk) 13:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Roji. You can use {{Request fair use delete}} for similar situations. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:40, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Internationalization of Template:FilemoverWelcome

Hi!

I've finished the internationalization of {{FilemoverWelcome}}. I see you translated this template to Macedonian. Now you can translate the title too. Best regards,

tacsipacsi (talk) 16:19, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not Macedonian, its Malayalam. Nevertheless, can you help with with the link to the template header? I could not find it. --Sreejith K (talk) 04:56, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the language. The English is at Template:FilemoverWelcome/heading/en, the Malayalam should be created at Template:FilemoverWelcome/heading/ml. tacsipacsi (talk) 08:57, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for helping. --Sreejith K (talk) 23:47, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed

Hi! Could you please have a look at this image and add a category? My ML-language skills are below zero :-)) Thank you for your time! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a category. Thanks for letting me know. You can put a message on my talk page if you need any ml related help. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:21, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I was gonna come to you for this image. We have deleted same image before under a different name. I guess it would be very difficult for you to find out the old name. Right? I will try and dig in. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Silly me! It was uploaded on same name before. INeverCry had deleted it in 15th May. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:28, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted again. Thanks for letting me know. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:24, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Also the User:Manavkailu143 has himself reviewed the images this time, most of which are non-India pics which BH claims to be theirs. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
& same with File:Aishwarya Launch Of Ambani Hospital.jpg. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:25, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From User:Gogo202222

UserGogo202222 Hello Sreejithk2000 Can I upload photos from this site http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/ --Gogo202222 (talk) 05:51, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

UserGogo202222 Hi Sreejithk2000 please look this page http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aishwarya_shined_at_the_100_years_of_Indian_cinema_Gala_celebration.jpg --Gogo202222 (talk) 14:57, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Reviewed the license. Thanks. --Sreejith K (talk) 02:45, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please categorize (and maybe bring over the similar files) of File:SiMha gaNapati.bmp.jpg.

Back in Jan 2012, you moved File:SiMha gaNapati.bmp.jpg over from en.wikipedia. But (probably due to the drama that occured around that time), you never categorized the image, or moved any of the other pages over. I'm trying to clear out that day's worth of uncategorized images, so it would be great if you would be willing to help categorize that one, or better, move over the other pages and give them all a new category. Thanks! JesseW (talk) 06:28, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - There you have it Category:Sritattvanidhi --Sreejith K (talk) 16:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent, thanks! Glad you are still here and working. (And glad to have that image out of the uncategorized list. ;-) ). JesseW (talk) 03:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indu Menon

ശ്രീജിത്ത്, ഇന്ദുമേനോന്റെ ഇവിടെ നിന്നും നീക്കം ചെയ്ത ചിത്രവും മലയാളം വിക്കിപീഡിയിലെ ചിത്രവുംഒന്നാണോഎന്ന് പരിശോധിക്കാമോ ഒരു ടിക്ക്റ്റ് ലഭിച്ചിട്ടുണ്ട് അത് പ്രോസസ്സ് ചെയ്യാൻവേണ്ടിയാണ്--Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 07:03, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They are not the same. But since the OTRS ticket talks about both, I have restored the commons image. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:58, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

പ്രമാണം:Chathannoor Mohan.jpg

File:Chathannoor Mohan.jpg--Rojypala (talk) 02:45, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Taken care. Thanks for the note. --Sreejith K (talk) 19:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, could you please update the composition of the Bhutanese parliament which elected a new government last July 31, 2013. Thank you Rizalninoynapoleon (talk) 17:35, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a note on the original uploader's page. Thank you. --Sreejith K (talk) 19:42, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indian free images

The National Repository of Open Educational Resources has content including many images open under CC-BY-SA 3.0. Image are here. Is there some bot or some automatic system which will upload all these pics here on Commons. There are tonnes of those. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think we have a bot currently, but you can ask someone to create a bot at Commons:Bots/Work requests --Sreejith K (talk) 19:24, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Done at Commons:Bots/Work_requests#Copying_files_from_an_external_website. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:00, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

and also uploaded image File:Decorated camel in India.jpg. But while uploading i got a error. When i used the {{NROER}} it showed that it has no license. So i had to separately add the license again. Can you please check and make the necessary corrections? Also, are any more categories or editing elsewhere required? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:51, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need Template:NROER/confirmed page as well as per current template. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:07, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes! Done that. But i still had to add the license separately in my second upload as well. Any idea whats missing? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:05, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind. I guess i was doing something wrong while uploading pic. It works good now. Hope to see many other users upload pics now. I will try and promote it a bit now on wikis. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:14, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Navya aadum koothu.jpg

File:Navya aadum koothu.jpg--Rojypala (talk) 17:55, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Navya aadum koothu.jpg. Thank you. --Sreejith K (talk) 19:57, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

remove border and subheading

Inserting "{{remove border}}" using VisualFileChange.js crippled first subheading (== {{int:filedesc}} ==) display, everywhere it applied. :-(--Praveen:talk 05:54, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's bad news. VisualFileChange is a dangerous script. Luckily we do not have too many replacements. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:46, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed most of them with AWB. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:04, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CRPF

Please transfer this file [1] to commons Perumalism Chat 14:07, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think the image is in public domain in US. Was the logo in public domain by the URAA date (January 1, 1996 for India)? If not, it is not free. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:03, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Central Reserve Police Force was reestablished under enactment of the CRPF Act on 28 December 1949. As per the Copyright Act 1911 Photographs created before 1958 are in the public domain 50 years after creation then It will be public domain in india at 1999 and URAA passed on January 1, 1996, So you are correct Perumalism Chat 18:26, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
then i wonder how this file [2] is avaliable in commons Perumalism Chat 18:34, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It should not. I have nominated the image for deletion now. --Sreejith K (talk) 18:37, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok Perumalism Chat 18:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

കാണുക

Category talk:N. A. Naseer --Praveen:talk 01:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:N._A._Naseer is not a user category. Why should they be hidden? --Praveen:talk 17:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This category is not hidden yet, but I think it should be. This is only a tracking category and not a real category. If it is not hidden, categorization bot will not mark included images as uncategorized. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:10, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No, those should not be. Naseer is a prominent photographer and that category and sub-categories are effectively organizing his photographs, and those are not tracking categories (something like Category:Paintings of men of India by Raja Ravi Varma‎). Files may need to categorize more efficiently, but in my opinion this shortcut is totally wrong--Praveen:talk 14:53, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I mentioned your name in a deletion discussion

You may be interested in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flirting With Fate Book.jpg. --GRuban (talk) 15:08, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A few years ago, you deleted File:3-Propinyl Benzene V.5.svg as a dup of File:Allyl Benzene V.2.svg, leaving a redirect. I think this is backwards. The image currently at the "allyl" name (three-carbon chain with a double bond) actually is a "propinyl" group (three-carbon chain with a triple bond). Technically it should just be "propinyl benzene" (no "3-" prefix) but that's a separate issue. Could you reverse this deletion/redirect? Or if you're not comfortable making that chemical determination, could you at least undelete so I can send it to DR and ping some other chemists? DMacks (talk) 07:40, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the file. Let me know if you need any further help. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:26, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Commons:Deletion requests/File:Allyl Benzene V.2.svg if you're interested. DMacks (talk) 16:26, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed

Hi! I found this photo. Can you identify the instrument? I think it should be sorted into another category besides user page images. Thanks for your time! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The instrument is called Veena, but I do not know the person in the picture. Perhaps its a user page image. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:21, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for adding the categories. Man, that is some heavy equipment! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:24, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hi Sreejithk2000 , User:Vahram Mekhitarian uploads pictures with falsifying data, he puts templates that it's his own work or public domain, thus hiding the copyright. In previous times when some of his pictures were nominated for deletion, he removed templates and admins didnt pay attention to it. I have already nominated some of that files for deletion due to copivio, please pay attention to it. He again and again remove the template, I do not know what to do, please warn him or block.--Δαβίδ (talk) 16:46, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the deletion request tool from the left side side bar in which case he will not be able to undo all the edits and administrators can easily notice it. Otherwise it is difficult to track his contributions. Having said that, I will loop through his contributions whenever I find time next. thanks for bringing it to my attention. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:55, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi Sreejithk2000, I have one question to you. Is it normal to upload such files here? There is no such an Armenian-Jewish friendship symbol, its only drawn by that user.--Δαβίδ (talk) 20:05, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If it is out of scope, it needs to be deleted. The image is used in multiple pages, so I am not sure whether it is {{Out of scope}} --Sreejith K (talk) 14:48, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any comments? JKadavoor Jee 06:54, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No comments. Multiple reasons. For one, I believe the image is under the threshhold of originality. Two, I do not personally feel its right to attack the logo of a political party which is as liberal as AAP. If the image was not under TOO, all we need here is an OTRS email. Having said that, I have contacted them to get an OTRS email confirming the license so that we wont get any more DR. Thanks for letting me know about the discussion. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:47, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Sreejith. JKadavoor Jee 15:19, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Benny p nayarambalam.png--Rojypala (talk) 06:11, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Likely {{Copyvio}} but I could not find a source elsewhere. So I put a DR to investigate. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:33, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You marked File:Shraddha Kapoor snapped at Mumbai Airport (1).jpg as having been reviewed for compliance with {{Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama}}. However, that license says it is only valid for photos that are sourced to Bollywood Hungama and that were taken at Bollywood Hungama parties and events. This photo appears to have been taken at an airport, not at a Bollywood Hungama event. Are you sure it complies with the license Bollywood Hungama sent to OTRS? —RP88 20:55, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Its actually the latter part of the statement that is important. Specifically (... with the exception of screenshots, wallpapers or promotional posters are exclusively created by their own photographers. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify these images ...). --Sreejith K (talk) 21:02, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Surely not. The sentence "All photographs used by this site from Bollywood Hungama parties/events ... are exclusively created by their own photographers" is them saying that they know that all photos on the Bollywood Hungama site at Bollywood Hungama parties/events were taken by their own photographers, so they have the authority to license them with a free license. They have "with the exception of screenshots, wallpapers or promotional posters" because presumably those promotional products, even if they depict a Bollywood Hungama event and are hosted at Bollywood Hungama, might have been created by someone who is not their employee. —RP88 21:08, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
For example, we've had to delete some photos taken at Cannes hosted at the Bollywood Hungama site, even though they were not screenshots, wallpapers or promotional posters. The photographer they used at Cannes was not one of their employees. I don't have OTRS access so I can't read their actual e-mail, but the license tag seems to say that they can only guarantee that the photos of Bollywood Hungama events were done by their photographers. —RP88 21:14, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am positive that the photos taken in the airports are by bollywood hungama photographers themselves. The OTRS ticket does not talk about it though. May be we should bring this question to a wider audience. I suggest Category talk:Unreviewed files from Bollywood Hungama and Template talk:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama. Or may be a DR. --Sreejith K (talk) 21:30, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I will think about this a bit, and then write up a proposal or topic for discussion. —RP88 23:24, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like a plan. Thank you. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:06, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Woman Montage (1).jpg, but the image is still tagged with {{Delete}}

I happened to notice that you closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Woman Montage (1).jpg, but the image is still tagged with {{Delete}}. Is a bot supposed to eventually come along and remove the {{Delete}} tag from File:Woman Montage (1).jpg and add the {{Kept}} tag to File_talk:Woman Montage (1).jpg, or was this a simple oversight on your part? Just curious. —RP88 03:46, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like I missed doing that. Please accept my apologies. I have corrected it now. --Sreejith K (talk) 04:12, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding bollywoodsargam.com

Good Day to You !!!
I would like to Know whether its OK to use Photographs owned by this Website in Commons.Site States As Follows.
Creative Work by BollywoodSargam.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0. Link
Thanks in Advance.MediaJet talk 16:11, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They are saying their creative work is in a free license, but all I see in their website is screenshots from movies which they do not have rights for. So I would be really careful to take any content from their website to host in Commons. In case you decide to upload it here, please add the template {{LicenseReview}} to your uploads. --Sreejith K (talk) 18:59, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes,You are Very Correct,I checked several watermarked photographs which they claim to be theirs,but NOT in REAL,Check this.

Watermarked Original Thanks for the guidance :) MediaJet talk 04:44, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Naseer's photos

ബോട്ടോട്ടി പകർപ്പവകാശം {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5-in|author=[[w:N. A. Naseer|N. A. Naseer]]|attribution= [[w:N. A. Naseer|N. A. Naseer]] / [http://www.nilgirimarten.com www.nilgirimarten.com] / naseerart@gmail.com}} എന്നാക്കി മാറ്റാനാകുമോ?--Praveen:talk 15:48, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done for all the images under Category:Photographs by N. A. Naseer --Sreejith K (talk) 20:54, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great! --Praveen:talk 03:42, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for reviewing so many images on Commons! :D Keep up the great work! AB01 (talk) 15:13, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
So glad that I could be of help. Thank you. --Sreejith K (talk) 21:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BH copyvios

Hi! Hope you are aware of the newly discovered gravity of the problem with BH images. Take a look at User_talk:Dharmadhyaksha#BH_image_clean_up and the list at Template_talk:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama#Link_collection is growing with many Indian location snaps as well. There also was discussion on en wiki about it. Thats the reason there are 200+ pending images left for license review. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 19:17, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything meaningful in these discussions. So what do you recommend? --Sreejith K (talk) 04:57, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What i think is that BH has started messing up in recent times, maybe they changed their terms and such of outsourcing. Hence we see multiple copies outside BH too, especially with newer event. I tried looking out for copies of older events and couldn't find any which could also be coincidence. Few newer events are also genuine. Although on a safer side nuking all 6000+ images will be a easier task, it would be a great loss. I can't decide yet whats good and hence am not taking any grand steps only asking for speedy del of individual images as and when i find them. What do you think should be done? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:42, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Hi dear sreejith .. kindly consider my own edits as priority on my own profile .also me.chinmaya m rao senior journalist is helped me do the same .. Help me to manage my profile "Sanjjanaa" I have certain genral editors who are trying to demoralize me through my Wikipedia profile which has lead me to loose films ... - archana.pics@gmail.com ... Thanx also I want to edit my pic if I could get ur email I'd I shall email u a new pic thank u ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Actresssanjjanaa (talk • contribs) 01:24, 17 November 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I understood you correctly. I do not see a picture in your en wiki or commons page, so not sure what you meant by saying profile pic. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:58, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My files with my original name are not deleted yet! What should I do? I couldn't have deleted my own images!!! Thats ridiculous...--Movietech (talk) 23:58, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let me see what I can do. I will put deletion requests on them again. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:17, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your request Goldbach-1000000

I have now completed your request Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop#File:Goldbach-1000000.svg and please check so the new file has all the right info and so on. --Goran tek-en (talk) 16:40, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 14:05, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I appreciate the note. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:11, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrillic OTRS business

Hi, there is an inquiry on the help desk about an image deleted by you in 2012. –Be..anyone (talk) 22:46, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied --Sreejith K (talk) 22:49, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:11, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Thanks, Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 19:14, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This DR

I don't know about this DR but the uploader has 22 copyright violation and no source found notices sadly from August 2012. How many more can Commons give? Its safer to delete his/her image here. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:32, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to every word you said; but I wanted a second eye to look at it just to be sure. Thanks for your patience. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:00, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New URL for OgreBot's old version filemover

Hello. I've identified you as a user who has previously used OgreBot's old version filemover. Please note the new URL: toollabs:magog/oldver.php. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:39, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have updated my bookmark. --Sreejith K (talk) 23:42, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, would you please be so kind and add the OTRS-Ticket Number to the file describtion? Thank you. Regards diba (talk) 11:03, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea why I missed tagging the image. I apologize. I have added the ticket to the file now. --Sreejith K (talk) 19:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tnx. diba (talk) 21:08, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

upload the display picture of Govinda(actor)

hi Sreejithk2000, it is my humble request for you to Please upload the display picture of Govinda(actor) on wikipedia (Link is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Govinda_%28actor%29). I have uploaded it so many times but everytime some issue occurs regarding license or copyright. Current display picture of Govinda is also uploaded by me and still some issue of copyright. I dont know how to fix it or upload image successfully. You can find best pictures of Govinda here http://themirchmasala.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/govinda-photoshoot.jpg

http://hamaraphotos.com/albums300_2012/wpw-20130504/hpse_normal__1644962347_%20Govinda%20photo%20shoot%20for%20designer%20Suprabha%20Jain%20%289%29.jpg

So it would be much better if you delete my picture and upload either the pictures whose link i have given above of Govinda without any licensing/copyright issue or upload any best picture of Govinda. Thank you

Unfortunately, we cannot pick any random image from the web and upload it in Wikipedia. For us, the image needs to be in a free license compatible with Wikimedia policies. Can you look at this page and pick an image? The images here are in a Wikimedia compatible license. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Whether license review is needed for these types of uploads? Jee 08:39, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the website is hosting the images under a free license. See http://indiabiodiversity.org/licenses. @Vinayaraj: , please correct me if I am wrong. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes; that website allows CC BY-SA-NC to CC-BY and people can change the license at any time. So it seems COM:LR applicable? Jee 14:03, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
License review seems appropriate. Its good to get the upload reviewed. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:04, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Do we have a strict policy on it or just "preferred"? I'm a bit new on LR. Thanks for the reply. Jee 14:20, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If the file is externally sourced, {{License review}} should be added. But this is not enforced now, probably because of the technical limitations. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK; thanks. Will try to review them whenever see such files too. Jee 15:28, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewed and corrected the license as in that site. Jee 15:42, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
All pictures in Indiabiodiversity.org except those imported from Biotik are seen having licenses CC by SA. --Vinayaraj (talk) 13:50, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry Vinayaraj; it is my fault that I didn't check the page history earlier. But note that those pictures are CC BY 3.0 licensed; not CC BY-SA 3.0 licensed. It will be helpful for the reviewers, if you mention "image 1", "image 2", etc. in the source as IBP stores all images in an observation together.
Not all images in IBP are CC BY-SA. My images there, are CC BY-NC-SA; so not eligible to upload here. Similarly they accept ND licensed works too. Thanks again. Jee 14:37, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your help on this matter is appreciated. Jee 14:30, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you handled it nicely. Thanks for your good work. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
For settling all issues with the Maalavika Manoj image, without giving me (the uploader) further tasks to accomplish. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:52, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Thank you.. Much appreciated --Sreejith K (talk) 17:42, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Freedom From Fear.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:10, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manuel García Ferré.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 20:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Asit Kumar Haldar 1913 The Beginning Tagore.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prosfilaes (talk) 10:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Nilfanion: has already declined this rename after your previous nomination. Please also look to resolve what is going to happen to all those others that you have nominated.  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:14, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I think I should stop nominating these graphs as duplicate, until I see the outcome of the existing nominations. --Sreejith K (talk) 04:15, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'd suggest a full deletion request would be best way to handle these. A single discussion in one place could do it after all.--Nilfanion (talk)

RJ Balaji image

The image RJ Balaji 2013.jpg that was uploaded by me has the link to the author's permission here. Is it fine? Kailash29792 (talk) 04:08, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure whether this is an acceptable form of permission. There is no signature and not even a declaration of the correct license. OTRS agents are likely to ask for more specific statement of permission. --Sreejith K (talk) 04:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please be a bit more careful when marking duplicates, you asked for deletion of file number 10 million at commons --Denniss (talk) 08:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Sorry. --Sreejith K (talk) 04:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I was using a script to tag them. It might not be a good plan. So I have started adding them to User:Sreejithk2000/Duplicates --Sreejith K (talk) 22:33, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Doubt regarding bollywood hungama license

If I am not mistaken, we aren't allowed to upload on the set images from bollywood hungama under Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama, are we? Cause it does state with the explicit exception of images from non-Indian events, film sets, screenshots, wallpapers Boseritwik (talk) 20:50, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

True. I believe the producer of the movie gets the copyright of the photos taken at the set. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:52, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Boseritwik (talk) 04:29, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

Sreejith, Could u please delete this image of Malayalam writer B.Murali. He request me to delete the image. I have uploaded a new image of him.--Fotokannan (talk) 11:00, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Sreejith K (talk) 01:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks --Fotokannan (talk) 03:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could you identify and categorize this image? I would appreciate it. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:06, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Sreejith K (talk) 01:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Elections to the Lok Sabha

Hallo Sreejithk2000, I have noticed that you have uploaded a photograph of an electronic voting machine. Are you still living in India and do you have the possibility to upload some photographs of election posters or election candidates ? This would be much appreciated. I have not found a single photograph of this large election campaign and election event on the Commons which I find really amazing. Greetings --Furfur (talk) 09:06, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The posters are all copyright protected. I am in US currently, but I see a lot of posters in facebook from my friends. Unfortunately, none of them are eligible to be uploaded here. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:52, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I understand. What a pity ! Eight hundred million voters and we have currently no single campaign poster ... Greetings --Furfur (talk) 21:43, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Albeit copyrighted, Google has a lot of images; in case you are interested to browse through. Link: https://www.google.com/search?q=india+election+posters&tbm=isch --Sreejith K (talk) 22:20, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks, I will have a try ... --Furfur (talk) 17:54, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TV logos

Hi,

I've seen your fantastic work with Canal+ Liga and Canal+ Fútbol logos, two Canal+ Spanish TV channels. It would be interesting to create the Canal+ Liga de Campeones and Canal+ Deportes logos to complete the section.

Thanks. Puente aereo (talk) 11:13, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the images. Thank you. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:16, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Sreejith Vijay New.jpg

Hi, I saw your message on my talk page about the picture of actor Sreejith Vijay. I had submitted the permission for the picture long time ago, and if my memory is correct, it was you who approved it. Not sure why the tagging now?et a n

The permission is authentic. If you need to verify it, you could do so by checking with the actor himself. If it is a problem with the text of the permission, I can possibly get a new one from him.

Regards

DileepKS69 (talk) 06:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We received permission for File:Sreejith Vijay.jpg and the image has been tagged approved. But the actor has not given permission for image File:Sreejith Vijay New.jpg. Do you mind asking him to send a new OTRS email for this image? Or he can reply back to the previous image as well if he still has that email. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If I recall correctly, there was a newer version of this file (by Newfraferz87) with a thickened ring; could you please restore it? In any case, thanks for carrying out these stupid requests of mine ;) YLSS (talk) 18:50, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the file for you to compare. Let me know if you want to keep them both. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:45, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, the 2010 version now appears on top of the 2013 version... Déjà vu... YLSS (talk) 20:55, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
May be it will get corrected if I delete them both again and restore it at one shot. But do you want both versions? --Sreejith K (talk) 20:57, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I guess so... The newer version is more correct; the older version is the original one. YLSS (talk) 07:26, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have fixed the order. Now we are good. Thanks. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:13, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to you!! YLSS (talk) 14:45, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dadasaheb Phalke Award

Hey...The list Dadasaheb Phalke Award is FL nominated and one of the reviewers suspects that some of the images in the list are possible copyvio. I do not have much knowledge about copyvios so could you please check the necessary images at Category:Dadasaheb Phalke Award recipients and let me know the bad ones so that I can tag them for deletion accordingly? Vivvt (talk) 21:34, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Kittens are mainly in cat family . They are the cuttest in domestic animals. It has sharp nails which is very hard and if scrates it pains a lot .

Devukutty (talk) 17:06, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Octahedral molecular shape.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 11:09, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion

Hi Sreejithk2000, it is only now that I noticed you deleted, in 2012, a picture I uploaded to commons showing a screenshot of the software litlink. Can you please explain what I have to do in order to prove that I am the copyright older, that is I am the developer of the software and thus entitled to produce and upload screenshots?--Nico b. (talk) 14:12, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I could not find the image in your uploads. Can you let me know the the image name? Alternatively, you can put a request at Commons:Undeletion requests --Sreejith K (talk) 14:41, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the omission, the image was Litlink_43a.jpg. On April 24, 2012 the CommonsDelinker bot removed the link from the German wikipedia to the picture because you deleted it from commons. We don't have to undelete that one but I would like to make sure that next time I follow the correct procedure to include the required prove of copyright.--Nico b. (talk) 18:10, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I found the page now. The deletion reason says that although free to download, the software manual states the software is copyrighted and doesn't allow commercial use. To avoid such problems, make sure that the copyright is displayed correctly on the website OR send an OTRS email to record the free license. --Sreejith K (talk) 19:50, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I will look into the OTRS stuff. Thanks for your help!--Nico b. (talk) 11:51, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Matma Rex (talk) 10:47, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ambalapuzha gopakumar.jpg

Sreejith, could u please rename this file--Fotokannan (talk) 03:22, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Sreejith K (talk) 16:50, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

collage of biology

can you tell me what happen to this picture File:Biology organism collage.png ? we were using that one on our Biology portal. Is there any other collage available on biology ? Irvin calicut (talk) 09:44, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The file had no source, so it got deleted. Can you check other options at Category:Montages of animals, Category:Montages of plants or Category:3×2 matrices --Sreejith K (talk) 13:26, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

മലബാറിലെ നായർ പെൺകുട്ടി (1914).jpg

Hi Sreejith, Thanks for merging the files. But I am afraid you did it the other way round. മലബാറിലെ നായർ പെൺകുട്ടി (1914).jpg is the original file since it was uplaoded first. Nair_woman.jpg is the duplicate file. Could you please revert and redirect the other way. Thanks. Achayan (talk) 09:18, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that File:മലബാറിലെ നായർ പെൺകുട്ടി (1914).jpg was the original file, but it had borders. Wikimedia does not recommend having borders inside the image itself. Do you think that file looks better than File:Nair_woman.jpg? I will wait for your answer before I revert. Thanks --Sreejith K (talk) 19:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bollywood Hungama

Hi, Don't you think that File:Abhishek Bachchan on the sets of 'Jhalak Dikhhlaa Jaa 5'(4).jpg, File:Abhishek Bachchan on the sets of 'Jhalak Dikhhlaa Jaa 5'(2).jpg, and File:Abhishek Bachchan on the sets of 'Jhalak Dikhhlaa Jaa 5'(10).jpg might be TV screenshots? See also File:Salman Khan and Sophie Choudry at Bigg Boss 8.jpg. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:37, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa and Bigg Boss are TV shows. The pictures are from the TV sets. I can't really say whether these are TV screenshots, but are likely to be it. From my experience so far with Bollywood Hungama images, their claim that the pictures were taken by their own photographers cannot be blindly trusted. Thats when I stopped reviewing them. For these images, I don't know what to say. --Sreejith K (talk) 21:36, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of old maps

Dear Sreejithk2000,

just by chance I noticed that you had deleted this old map and other maps uploaded by the same uploader. Perhaps Kirk didn't use the correct license. For such old maps, the license should be {{PD-old-70-1923}}. A copyright notice and watermark by the file hoster ČUZK - www.cuzk.cz of maps of the 19th century, however, is not an indication of copyrighted material, but copyfraud. Am I seeing this right? Do you have a way to restore the deleted maps? I would surely help attaching the correct PD license tags. Greetings,--Ratzer (talk) 07:25, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please add a request at Commons:Undelete so that it is easier to track? --Sreejith K (talk) 16:22, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Hi, These are in the public domain. They should not be deleted as copyvios. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:52, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. I got blinded by the copyright violation notice. Thank you for restoring the files.--Sreejith K (talk) 14:34, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

A Very Good day to you !!

Please resolve this -> Link Thanks --MediaJet talk 13:38, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Replied there. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:27, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your cooperation --MediaJet talk 18:15, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging

Hey, I noticed that you tagged File:Hassan Bagheri.jpg. I should tell you that I did not upload it and I only transferred the file from wikipedia. what should I do to avoid its deletion? Mhhossein (talk) 07:15, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, you may see that Sajed.ir has licensed the contents under GFDL license. It is written at the bottom of the site "«کلیهٔ مطالب تحت مجوز مستندات آزاد گنو (GFDL) منتشر می‌شوند». Mhhossein (talk) 07:25, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hmmm, interesting. I have changed the {{No license}} tag to {{License review}}. I think the image is under a free license, we just need someone to review that. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:35, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I inserted some information but I don't know who the author of this image is. What should be done? Mhhossein (talk) 07:03, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hassan Bagheri.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 14:56, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

A Very Good Day to You !!!

I created a montage using two photographs,that come under two licenses,in such circumstances what should be the most appropriate license tag we should place on the page in question,This is the photograph (montage) -> Link,I am aware that there are license tags which carry multiple licenses,such as this -> Template:Cc-by-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0,but none of these tags carry CC Zero with them,So what is the most correct tag to place when dealing with multiple photographs that come under Public Domain (CC Zero) and other CC licenses,or else is it OK to create a new Template to suit the needs,Thank You --MediaJet talk 16:44, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I believe you have to choose the most restrictive license among the included images; in this case that is Creative Commons license. The best place to ask this question is Commons:Help desk --Sreejith K (talk) 20:44, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you --MediaJet talk 08:18, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maps with timestamp

Hi Sreejithk2000, please don't mark maps with timestamp as duplicates (File:EU28-2013-Eastern Partnership.svg). They are historical maps, used for example in en:history of the euro. A map with the timestamp 2013 is only valid for the year 2013 and not to be confused with a general map that will be updated. (See also: User talk:Hedwig in Washington/Archive/2014#Historical maps.) --Kolja21 (talk) 21:35, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have restored the image. --Sreejith K (talk) 18:48, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect. Thanks! --Kolja21 (talk) 23:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and happy new year

well i saw a message about a picture i've added for Alain Marechal, cyclist, something about copyrights... i personnaly took this picture... so there's no problem; i can send you the original file with date and everything.

Robertgil (talk) 16:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)robertgil[reply]

Happy new year to you too. The problem with the image you uploaded was that you specified Barlat in the author field. I was not sure whether that's your name or not. Do you mind correcting the source and Author fields? If you own the copyright of the picture, please add {{Own}} as the source --Sreejith K (talk) 21:55, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File deleting

Helloǃ Why you deleted my file from w:c:Category:Stamps of the Soviet Union, 1969? It wasn't dublicate fale, it was another image format. --Matsievsky (talk) 00:50, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure we want the same image in two different formats? Normally, we prefer one single copy. --Sreejith K (talk) 13:12, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for answer. Users want the same image in two different formats. PNG and JPEG aren't identical from the point of view of assignment: JPEG is intended generally for use in Wiki, PNG is, as providing the best quality, generally for external users. The vast majority of images of stamps have the JPEG format. Let users decide, what formats for them it is better. Please return files. --Matsievsky (talk) 18:00, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use of the photographs

Respected Sir,


I am a student and want to use the photograph of Amorphophallus located at website File:ചേന.JPG for some purpose for which I require your permission. Please provide me your mail ID so that I can contact you. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 14.139.249.82 (talk) 00:50, 20 February 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

As per the copyright of the image, you are free to copy, distribute and/or modify this image as long as you credit the original uploader (Aruna at Malayalam Wikipedia) --Sreejith K (talk) 13:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]