User talk:ZioNicco/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Liborio Romano.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Caulfield (talk) 15:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Prof giuliano romano.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Caulfield (talk) 16:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Ziehrer carl michael.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Caulfield (talk) 16:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Orto Botanico Messina.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Caulfield (talk) 07:08, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Stendardo delle UU.NN. della Guardia Costiera.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Caulfield (talk) 07:36, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Buontalenti finestra inginocchiata.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Caulfield (talk) 06:55, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Ciancherotti, stemma nobiliare.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Caulfield (talk) 06:59, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Foto Aprilia GP.jpg

ZioNicco Il file è di proprietà !! Non è di terzi . Livbel (talk) 05:19, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

@Livbel Se fosse di proprietà (inteso che l'hai scattata tu e non che tu ne abbia una copia, a noi interessa chi scatta la foto), dovresti averne una versione più grande, questa sembra presa da internet, in alto nella foto si legge poco ma c'è scritto copyright di qualcuno che non sembri tu, la data non coincide con quella che hai indicato. Nella tua pagina di discussione trovi le indicazioni utili. ZioNicco (talk) 09:15, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Matrix code.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Matrix code.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kartoo.png

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kartoo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kartoo.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

shizhao (talk) 03:33, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Estonianworkerscommuneflag.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

95.52.115.241 00:11, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Locone1.png

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Locone1.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ruthven (msg) 14:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

@Ruthven mi pare di averla importata la fonte, che è una altra foto di commons, con link e autore, dici che non basta?. ZioNicco (talk) 14:25, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
@ZioNicco Hai visto l'altra mappa su Commons? Ruthven (msg) 14:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
A me sembra copiata da qualche sito, ma Idefix credo abbia fatto molte mappe in passato... Presumiamo buona fede? Ruthven (msg) 14:32, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
@Ruthven adesso ho capito, non avevo visto che avevi segnalato anche l'immagine originale, onestamente non lo so né ho viste una marea di quel tipo di immagini, bisognerebbe passarle in blocco se è così. ZioNicco (talk) 14:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
mmmmmm ci penso su, perché ce ne sono veramente tante così. Ma era il 2006 e si era più "rilassati" sulla fonte (o meno attenti alla cosa).
Se vuoi, rimuovi i miei avvisi e precisa la fonte (che potrebbe essere {{PD-Demis}}), che tanto non ho aperta nessuna cancellazione. Ruthven (msg) 15:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Importexx 016.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Giorgio Napolitano con Giancarlo Pajetta 1987.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andr€a (talk) 10:28, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Santa Maria Assunta Arixi 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estopedist1 (talk) 09:58, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Musaba avvisi di problemi con i permessi

Grazie delle segnalazioni. A parte essere l'autore delle immagini e non il detentore dei diritti delle opere, se ci sono problemi dove richiedo la loro cancellazione?Fernando.tassone (talk) 07:03, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Ho fatto richiesta di cancellazione per ogni singolo file da te proposto, e quindi sono stati inseriti nella lista di richiesta.
Spero che @Ruthven o altri come amministratori possano procedere se invece devo fare qualche altra azione attendo istruzioni.
Grazie Fernando.tassone Fernando.tassone (talk) 08:45, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

I don't think this one will be the copyright violation, but it is just red flag. With using two elements:

Alexphangia Talk 07:56, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

@Alexphangia it is not true that those elements have been taken, they are similar but not the same. If the image comes from the indicated site, it is necessary to have permissions. I start an ordinary procedure so that a trace of the thing remains. ZioNicco (talk) 08:34, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
File:GrattacieliLaDefense.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 11:08, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Category:Volatile_organic_compound has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Wostr (talk) 11:11, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Piazza San Giovanni XXIII con vista sul Monte di Viggiano.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gianfranco Grieco (talk) 11:01, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Scorcio bosco verticale.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Nanyue Huairang.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Nanyue Huairang.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Nanyue Huairang.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ruthven (msg) 13:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:Gordjazz.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gordjazz.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Gordjazz.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ruthven (msg) 10:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

@Ruthven Cosa è che non ti convince? vedendola non mi sembrava servisse la mail. ZioNicco (talk) 10:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
@ZioNicco Un minimo di spirito critico, su! Qualcuno che scrive "Io" (o qualcosa del genere) in una foto, vuol dire che la foto non l'ha scattata lui. I diritti d'autore, ti ricordo, appartengono al fotografo, non al "fotografato". Ruthven (msg) 12:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
@Ruthven però capisci che la foto l'ha messa sulla sua pagina utente, ovvero probabilmente a qualcuno che passava gli ha detto "scattami la foto", adesso mi sembra cercare di fare veramente tanto i difficili. ZioNicco (talk) 13:09, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
"Probabilmente qualcuno"... si, certo, e se mi chiamassi Pippo Baudo sarei probabilmente un presentatore televisivo. :)
Le autorizzazione servono esattamente a questo. Chi dice "Scansisci la foto e mettila sulla tua pagina personale" forse non sa che la foto può anche essere ripubblicata altrove, il suo nome usato, ecc... Ruthven (msg) 14:19, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Marco Pannella alla manifestazione antiproibizionista a Roma 1989.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 07:53, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Ric Flair with Paul Billets (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 07:55, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Paraformaldeide formula.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 01:02, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

File:ParigiLouvreConPiramide.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Corigliano d'Otranto arco Lucchetti 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Freddyballo (talk) 17:53, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Category:Automotore_FS_211 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


ZandDev (talk) 15:18, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Categorie

Ciao ZioNicco, le categorie andrebbero create se esistono almeno due immagini presenti, altrimenti il rimando dalla voce di wiki è alla stessa fotografia presente nella stessa e non aggiunge altro. (Ricordo di una discussione di una decina d'anni fa circa) --Caulfield (talk) 15:22, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

@Caulfield Vero ma con wikidata possono venire gratis una serie di categorie aggiunte automaticamente. ZioNicco (talk) 16:34, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright
File:FSA Helfaya(Hama) Syria dec2012.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 05:25, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Kit kat packs.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

plicit 02:43, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Simple images

Please note that simple logos such as File:Brembo logo.png or flags such as File:Flag of Benna.gif are ineligible for copyright, because they do not meet the threshold of originality (see Italy-specific section). If you are not sure if it is simple or not, you may nominate it for regular deletion, but do not nominate any images for speedy deletion unless you are absolutely sure they are complex enough to be copyrighted. -- King of ♥ 16:11, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Tocotrienoli.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 16:27, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Menadione.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 16:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Fosfopanteteina.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 16:29, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Coenzima A.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 16:33, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Don Baronio (Leonardo Lucchi).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ruthven (msg) 14:54, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Gold Souq Metro Dubai.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

25stargeneral (talk) 16:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Rievocazione Storica Taranto manifesto.jpg

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rievocazione Storica Taranto manifesto.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ruthven (msg) 12:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Giovanni Battista Piazzoni.gif

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Giovanni Battista Piazzoni.gif, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 08:25, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

As the creator of the category in question, don't you have a view there? Leyo 09:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lotta Continua.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Lotta Continua.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

shizhao (talk) 02:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Consorzio Vino Chianti

Le cancellazioni che ho visto in tale pagina utente e scoperto oggi sono poco collaborative. Mi sembra abbastanza chiaro che sono loro, bastava chiedere in tal senso prima di procedere.

Comunque il logo non deve nemmeno essere autorizzato, perché non è originale a livello di copyright. Io non perderei tempo a spiegare loro come autorizzare per tenere la bottiglia di Chianti Riserva, ma il logo va rimesso. E' meno originale di quello del Milan FC e il template era chiaramente descrittivo e completo, mi ricordo perché l'ho letto. Il carattere veniva usato per le botti dall'Ottocento.

Procedo io a richiedere la scancellazione. Alexmar983 (talk) 10:30, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

@Alexmar983 chiaro anche no, per dire in it.wiki l'utenza sarebbe stata bloccata per NUI. Per questo tipo di immagini cose serve mail a permission... come indicato. ZioNicco (talk) 11:16, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
ZioNicco non siamo su itwikipedia. Nel mondo del buon senso se uno ha un certo nome e si qualifica in un certo modo, si chiede. POI eventualmente se non arriva VTRS si procede (ma come in migliaia di casi non lo ha nemmeno chiesto nessuno per ann, non è obbligatorio), perché si riduce il tempo perso di tutti. Questo si fa nell'interesse dei contenuti. Il resto è "gioco di ruolo". Di quelli che se lo facesse un niubbo un utente esperto se gli sta antipatico e gli girà probabilmente gli dà un bello scapaccione per mancanza di buon senso. Il famoso "caso per caso"
Detto questo, se qualcuno vuole mandare in cancellazione meglio abbia chiare prima le normative. Il marchio è una proposta sbagliata. La altre sono forzose e non hanno nessuno effetto pratico sulla difesa delle licenze di commons (se perdi tempo dove non c'è probabilmente un problema aggiungendo passaggi, ovviamente non ti occupi di dove i problemi ci sono, ma questo è un problema di Commons e a me interessa poco o nulla, sarebbe meglio interessasse a chi se ne vuole occupare ma ognuno ha i suoi passatempo) ma il marchio è proprio sbagliata perché è di default in pubblico dominio. Questo fatto è chiaro?
Se si vuole continuare a mandare avvisi prima di chiedere complicando i passaggi nessuno lo può impedire, ripeto per me son "giochini di ruolo" e avendo un nome e congome pubblico preferisco intestarmi chiaramente tale critica. Però almeno le linee guida sui marchi registrati che sono in pubblico dominio, sono chiare? Quindi sarebbe meglio che tu intervanga a spiegare che ti è chiaro l'errore. Altrimenti non sei obbligato quindi se vuoi continuare a mandare in cancellazione tutti i marchi simili fai pure, puoi partire da quello del Milan se vuoi. Ciao.--Alexmar983 (talk) 13:18, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
@Alexmar983 se ho richiesto la cancellazione era perché la licenza non era corretta, (mi pare cc) cosa che difficilmente poteva essere. Comunque io ho proposto per la cancellazione, io non cancello quindi un amministratore ha valutato che la soglia di orginalità non era rispettata. Da parte mia nessun errore, dove ritengo che ci sia da segnalare segnalo, dove no no. ZioNicco (talk) 13:35, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
ZioNicco questo è "gioco di ruolo". Vuoi ricoprire un ruolo e NON un altro. In termini wiki collaborativi 1) l'amministratore è errato (e peraltro è noto e non è la prima volta che sento questo errore... mi fu già segnalato in passato, ma è una ltro che gli piace "il ruolo") quindi è tuo dovere imparando la lezione andare per primo dall'amministratore e accertarsi che abbia capito per il futuro. Questo è collaborazione, cinque minuti del tuo tempo per risparmiarne ore altrui in futuro. 2) Salendo ancora alla base, se una licenza è errata e sei compentente, la cambi. Se non sei competente allora accetta che non è il caso di occupartene, no?. Non c'è nessuna vantaggio wiki nel chiedere cancellazioni gratuite, non servono a nulla per la collabroazioe, se è è solo una medaglia che ci si mette, di fondo lo si fa allo specchio per un "ruolo". A te piace quel "ruolo"? Ok, ma la collaborazione wiki è un'altra cosa e ti consiglio d non frequentare troppo ambienti dove non te lo insegnano anzi ti rafforzano nell'idea opposta. Se poi vuoi continuare a farlo, scelta tua, ma è un consiglio utile quello di non ricoprire i "ruoli"... e imparare cosa è la vera collaborazione wiki. Cancellazioni così non servono a nulla.Poi il mondo è pieno di cattivi maestri che racconteranno che servono a fare "pulizia", ma la "pulizia" è un'altra cosa. Nel tempo che fai girare tutti in tondo invece di fare una normale richiesta, sai quanti file pattume avresti fatto cancellare?. e infatti il backlog aumenta e aumenta e aumenta... un giorno quando si imparerà a gestire in modo funzionale, si pulirà, ma è evidente che deve ancora aumentare e tanto....--Alexmar983 (talk) 14:19, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
@Alexmar983 per me la cancellazione è leggittima. punto. ZioNicco (talk) 14:43, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Bene a questo punto perdonami se faccio una cosa non nel'interesse della piattaforma o dei contenuti o del lavoro volontario, ma mio: ti dico di continuare a fare come in questo caso. Non cambiare nulla, questo fa piacere a te probabilmente, quindi non dovrebbero esserci problemi. Se ti capita una cancellazione simile di un altro marchio senza originalità non chiedere in talk, non pensare a quanto ho scritto, procedi a richiederla. Se ti capita di farlo più spesso, nessun problema per me.--Alexmar983 (talk) 14:49, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
@Alexmar983 perdona però io l'ho segnalata al caricatore che non sei tu, il caricatore non ha detto niente per 9 giorni, non ha scritto né a me né nella sua talk, vedo che nella sua pagina oltre al logo ci sono altre 2 segnalazioni per altre 2 immagini presumo per problemi analoghi. Magari poteva scrivere qualcosa, risultato non abbiamo il logo del consorzio del chianti, peccato quando verrà caricato con le licenze opportune lo avremo, nulla di irreparabile. ZioNicco (talk) 17:09, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
ZioNicco tranquillo non devi giustificarti nulla, quello che hai fatto, come lo hai fatto, fallo ancora. Anche di più, più spesso, su più file, e di più uploader. Non è un problea per me no problem. Ciao.--Alexmar983 (talk) 17:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC)